Estimating the prevalence of researcher misconduct: a study of UK academics within biological sciences

Misconduct in academic research is undoubtedly increasing, but studies estimating the prevalence of such behaviour suffer from biases inherent in researching sensitive topics. We compared the unmatched-count technique (UCT) and the crosswise-model (CM), two methods specifically designed to increase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, David L., St. John, Freya A.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2014
Materias:
Ethical Issues
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25250215
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.562

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25250215
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.562

Ejemplares similares