Cargando…
PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The survival rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients carrying wild-type KRAS is significantly increased by combining anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) with standard chemotherapy. However, conflicting data exist in both the wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS groups, which strongly challeng...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107926 |
_version_ | 1782336888074403840 |
---|---|
author | Shan, Lianfeng Li, Ming Ma, Jianzhong Zhang, Huidan |
author_facet | Shan, Lianfeng Li, Ming Ma, Jianzhong Zhang, Huidan |
author_sort | Shan, Lianfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The survival rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients carrying wild-type KRAS is significantly increased by combining anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) with standard chemotherapy. However, conflicting data exist in both the wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS groups, which strongly challenge CRC anti-EGFR treatment. Here we conducted a meta-analysis in an effort to provide more reliable information regarding anti-EGFR treatment in CRC patients. METHODS: We searched full reports of randomized clinical trials using Medline, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Two investigators independently screened the published literature according to our inclusive and exclusive criteria and the relative data were extracted. We used Review Manager 5.2 software to analyze the data. RESULTS: The addition of anti-EGFR mAb to standard chemotherapy significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (mOS) in the wild-type KRAS group; hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and mOS were 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58–0.84] and 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75–0.91], respectively. In sub-analyses of the wild-type KRAS group, when PCR-based assays are employed, PFS and mOS notably increase: the HRs were 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62–0.88] and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78–0.96], respectively. In sub-analyses of the mutant KRAS group, neither PCR-based assays nor direct sequencing enhance PFS or mOS. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PCR-based assays with high sensitivity and specificity allow accurate identification of patients with wild-type KRAS and thus increase PFS and mOS. Furthermore, such assays liberate patients with mutant KRAS from unnecessary drug side effects, and provide them an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment. Thus, establishing a precise standard reference test will substantially optimize CRC-targeted therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4178055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41780552014-10-02 PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Shan, Lianfeng Li, Ming Ma, Jianzhong Zhang, Huidan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The survival rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients carrying wild-type KRAS is significantly increased by combining anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) with standard chemotherapy. However, conflicting data exist in both the wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS groups, which strongly challenge CRC anti-EGFR treatment. Here we conducted a meta-analysis in an effort to provide more reliable information regarding anti-EGFR treatment in CRC patients. METHODS: We searched full reports of randomized clinical trials using Medline, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Two investigators independently screened the published literature according to our inclusive and exclusive criteria and the relative data were extracted. We used Review Manager 5.2 software to analyze the data. RESULTS: The addition of anti-EGFR mAb to standard chemotherapy significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (mOS) in the wild-type KRAS group; hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and mOS were 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58–0.84] and 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75–0.91], respectively. In sub-analyses of the wild-type KRAS group, when PCR-based assays are employed, PFS and mOS notably increase: the HRs were 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62–0.88] and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78–0.96], respectively. In sub-analyses of the mutant KRAS group, neither PCR-based assays nor direct sequencing enhance PFS or mOS. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PCR-based assays with high sensitivity and specificity allow accurate identification of patients with wild-type KRAS and thus increase PFS and mOS. Furthermore, such assays liberate patients with mutant KRAS from unnecessary drug side effects, and provide them an opportunity to receive appropriate treatment. Thus, establishing a precise standard reference test will substantially optimize CRC-targeted therapies. Public Library of Science 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4178055/ /pubmed/25260023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107926 Text en © 2014 Shan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shan, Lianfeng Li, Ming Ma, Jianzhong Zhang, Huidan PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | PCR-Based Assays versus Direct Sequencing for Evaluating the Effect of KRAS Status on Anti-EGFR Treatment Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | pcr-based assays versus direct sequencing for evaluating the effect of kras status on anti-egfr treatment response in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107926 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shanlianfeng pcrbasedassaysversusdirectsequencingforevaluatingtheeffectofkrasstatusonantiegfrtreatmentresponseincolorectalcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liming pcrbasedassaysversusdirectsequencingforevaluatingtheeffectofkrasstatusonantiegfrtreatmentresponseincolorectalcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT majianzhong pcrbasedassaysversusdirectsequencingforevaluatingtheeffectofkrasstatusonantiegfrtreatmentresponseincolorectalcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghuidan pcrbasedassaysversusdirectsequencingforevaluatingtheeffectofkrasstatusonantiegfrtreatmentresponseincolorectalcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |