Cargando…
Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation
BACKGROUND: It is not clear that teaching specific history taking, physical examination and patient teaching techniques to medical students results in durable behavioural changes. We used a quasi-experimental design that approximated a randomized double blinded trial to examine whether a Participato...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15140263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-8 |
_version_ | 1782121436174876672 |
---|---|
author | Solomon, David J Laird-Fick, Heather S Keefe, Carole W Thompson, Margaret E Noel, Mary Margaret |
author_facet | Solomon, David J Laird-Fick, Heather S Keefe, Carole W Thompson, Margaret E Noel, Mary Margaret |
author_sort | Solomon, David J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is not clear that teaching specific history taking, physical examination and patient teaching techniques to medical students results in durable behavioural changes. We used a quasi-experimental design that approximated a randomized double blinded trial to examine whether a Participatory Decision-Making (PDM) educational module taught in a clerkship improves performance on a Simulated Patient Exercise (SPE) in another clerkship, and how this is influenced by the time between training and assessment. METHODS: Third year medical students in an internal medicine clerkship were assessed on their use of PDM skills in an SPE conducted in the second week of the clerkship. The rotational structure of the third year clerkships formed a pseudo-randomized design where students had 1) completed the family practice clerkship containing a training module on PDM skills approximately four weeks prior to the SPE, 2) completed the family medicine clerkship and the training module approximately 12 weeks prior to the SPE or 3) had not completed the family medicine clerkship and the PDM training module at the time they were assessed via the SPE. RESULTS: Based on limited pilot data there were statistically significant differences between students who received PDM training approximately four weeks prior to the SPE and students who received training approximately 12 weeks prior to the SPE. Students who received training 12 weeks prior to the SPE performed better than those who received training four weeks prior to the SPE. In a second comparison students who received training four weeks prior to the SPE performed better than those who did not receive training but the differences narrowly missed statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a methodology for conducting rigorous curricular evaluations using natural experiments based on the structure of clinical rotations. In addition, it provided preliminary data suggesting targeted educational interventions can result in marked improvements in the clinical skills spontaneously exhibited by physician trainees in a setting different from which the skills were taught. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-419360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4193602004-05-28 Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation Solomon, David J Laird-Fick, Heather S Keefe, Carole W Thompson, Margaret E Noel, Mary Margaret BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: It is not clear that teaching specific history taking, physical examination and patient teaching techniques to medical students results in durable behavioural changes. We used a quasi-experimental design that approximated a randomized double blinded trial to examine whether a Participatory Decision-Making (PDM) educational module taught in a clerkship improves performance on a Simulated Patient Exercise (SPE) in another clerkship, and how this is influenced by the time between training and assessment. METHODS: Third year medical students in an internal medicine clerkship were assessed on their use of PDM skills in an SPE conducted in the second week of the clerkship. The rotational structure of the third year clerkships formed a pseudo-randomized design where students had 1) completed the family practice clerkship containing a training module on PDM skills approximately four weeks prior to the SPE, 2) completed the family medicine clerkship and the training module approximately 12 weeks prior to the SPE or 3) had not completed the family medicine clerkship and the PDM training module at the time they were assessed via the SPE. RESULTS: Based on limited pilot data there were statistically significant differences between students who received PDM training approximately four weeks prior to the SPE and students who received training approximately 12 weeks prior to the SPE. Students who received training 12 weeks prior to the SPE performed better than those who received training four weeks prior to the SPE. In a second comparison students who received training four weeks prior to the SPE performed better than those who did not receive training but the differences narrowly missed statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a methodology for conducting rigorous curricular evaluations using natural experiments based on the structure of clinical rotations. In addition, it provided preliminary data suggesting targeted educational interventions can result in marked improvements in the clinical skills spontaneously exhibited by physician trainees in a setting different from which the skills were taught. BioMed Central 2004-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC419360/ /pubmed/15140263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-8 Text en Copyright © 2004 Solomon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Solomon, David J Laird-Fick, Heather S Keefe, Carole W Thompson, Margaret E Noel, Mary Margaret Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
title | Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
title_full | Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
title_fullStr | Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
title_short | Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
title_sort | using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15140263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-4-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solomondavidj usingaformativesimulatedpatientexerciseforcurriculumevaluation AT lairdfickheathers usingaformativesimulatedpatientexerciseforcurriculumevaluation AT keefecarolew usingaformativesimulatedpatientexerciseforcurriculumevaluation AT thompsonmargarete usingaformativesimulatedpatientexerciseforcurriculumevaluation AT noelmarymargaret usingaformativesimulatedpatientexerciseforcurriculumevaluation |