Cargando…

Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact that anatomy-focused radiology teaching has on non-examined knowledge regarding radiation safety and radiology as a specialty. METHODS: First-year undergraduate medical students completed surveys prior to and after undertaking the first-year anatomy programme that i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Kevin P., Crush, Lee, O’Malley, Eoin, Daly, Fergus E., O’Tuathaigh, Colm M. P., O’Connor, Owen J., Cryan, John F., Maher, Michael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0346-0
_version_ 1782339367999635456
author Murphy, Kevin P.
Crush, Lee
O’Malley, Eoin
Daly, Fergus E.
O’Tuathaigh, Colm M. P.
O’Connor, Owen J.
Cryan, John F.
Maher, Michael M.
author_facet Murphy, Kevin P.
Crush, Lee
O’Malley, Eoin
Daly, Fergus E.
O’Tuathaigh, Colm M. P.
O’Connor, Owen J.
Cryan, John F.
Maher, Michael M.
author_sort Murphy, Kevin P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact that anatomy-focused radiology teaching has on non-examined knowledge regarding radiation safety and radiology as a specialty. METHODS: First-year undergraduate medical students completed surveys prior to and after undertaking the first-year anatomy programme that incorporates radiological anatomy. Students were asked opinions on preferred learning methodology and tested on understanding of radiology as a specialty and radiation safety. RESULTS: Pre-module and post-module response rates were 93 % (157/168) and 85 % (136/160), respectively. Pre-module and post-module, self-directed learning (SDL) ranked eighth (of 11) for preferred gross-anatomy teaching formats. Correct responses regarding radiologist/radiographer roles varied from 28-94 % on 16 questions with 4/16 significantly improving post-module. Identification of modalities that utilise radiation significantly improved for five of eight modalities post-module but knowledge regarding relative amount of modality-specific radiation use was variable pre-module and post-module. CONCLUSIONS: SDL is not favoured as an anatomy teaching method. Exposure of students to a radiological anatomy module delivered by senior clinical radiologists improved basic knowledge regarding ionising radiation use, but there was no improvement in knowledge regarding radiation exposure relative per modality. A possible explanation is that students recall knowledge imparted in didactic lectures but do little reading around the subject when the content is not examined. TEACHING POINTS: • Self-directed learning is not favoured as a gross anatomy teaching format amongst medical students. • An imaging anatomy-focused module improved basic knowledge regarding ionising radiation use. • Detailed knowledge of modality-specific radiation exposure remained suboptimal post-module. • Knowledge of roles within a clinical radiology department showed little change post-module.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4195841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41958412014-10-20 Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning Murphy, Kevin P. Crush, Lee O’Malley, Eoin Daly, Fergus E. O’Tuathaigh, Colm M. P. O’Connor, Owen J. Cryan, John F. Maher, Michael M. Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact that anatomy-focused radiology teaching has on non-examined knowledge regarding radiation safety and radiology as a specialty. METHODS: First-year undergraduate medical students completed surveys prior to and after undertaking the first-year anatomy programme that incorporates radiological anatomy. Students were asked opinions on preferred learning methodology and tested on understanding of radiology as a specialty and radiation safety. RESULTS: Pre-module and post-module response rates were 93 % (157/168) and 85 % (136/160), respectively. Pre-module and post-module, self-directed learning (SDL) ranked eighth (of 11) for preferred gross-anatomy teaching formats. Correct responses regarding radiologist/radiographer roles varied from 28-94 % on 16 questions with 4/16 significantly improving post-module. Identification of modalities that utilise radiation significantly improved for five of eight modalities post-module but knowledge regarding relative amount of modality-specific radiation use was variable pre-module and post-module. CONCLUSIONS: SDL is not favoured as an anatomy teaching method. Exposure of students to a radiological anatomy module delivered by senior clinical radiologists improved basic knowledge regarding ionising radiation use, but there was no improvement in knowledge regarding radiation exposure relative per modality. A possible explanation is that students recall knowledge imparted in didactic lectures but do little reading around the subject when the content is not examined. TEACHING POINTS: • Self-directed learning is not favoured as a gross anatomy teaching format amongst medical students. • An imaging anatomy-focused module improved basic knowledge regarding ionising radiation use. • Detailed knowledge of modality-specific radiation exposure remained suboptimal post-module. • Knowledge of roles within a clinical radiology department showed little change post-module. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4195841/ /pubmed/25107581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0346-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murphy, Kevin P.
Crush, Lee
O’Malley, Eoin
Daly, Fergus E.
O’Tuathaigh, Colm M. P.
O’Connor, Owen J.
Cryan, John F.
Maher, Michael M.
Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
title Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
title_full Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
title_fullStr Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
title_full_unstemmed Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
title_short Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
title_sort medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0346-0
work_keys_str_mv AT murphykevinp medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT crushlee medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT omalleyeoin medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT dalyferguse medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT otuathaighcolmmp medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT oconnorowenj medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT cryanjohnf medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning
AT mahermichaelm medicalstudentknowledgeregardingradiologybeforeandafteraradiologicalanatomymoduleimplicationsforverticalintegrationandselfdirectedlearning