Cargando…

Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?

Child-directed cues support imitation of novel actions at 18 months, but not at two years of age. The current studies explore the mechanisms that underlie the propensity that children have to copy others at 18 months, and how the value of child-directed communication changes over development. We ask...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shneidman, Laura, Todd, Roisleen, Woodward, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110891
_version_ 1782340644078878720
author Shneidman, Laura
Todd, Roisleen
Woodward, Amanda
author_facet Shneidman, Laura
Todd, Roisleen
Woodward, Amanda
author_sort Shneidman, Laura
collection PubMed
description Child-directed cues support imitation of novel actions at 18 months, but not at two years of age. The current studies explore the mechanisms that underlie the propensity that children have to copy others at 18 months, and how the value of child-directed communication changes over development. We ask if attentional allocation accounts for children's failure to imitate observed actions at 18 months, and their success at two years of age, and we explore the informational value child-directed contexts may provide across ontogeny. Eighteen-month-old (Study 1) and two-year-old (Study 2) children viewed causally non-obvious actions performed by child-directed (Study 1 & 2), observed (Study 1 & 2), or non-interactive (Study 2) actors, and their visual attention and imitative behaviors were assessed. Results demonstrated that child-directed contexts supported imitative learning for 18-month-old children, independent of their effects on proximal attention. However, by two years of age, neither directness nor communication between social partners was a necessary condition for supporting social imitation. These findings suggest that developmental changes in children's propensity to extract information from observation cannot be accounted for by changes in children's interpretation of what counts as child-directed information, and are likely not due to changes in how children allocate attention to observed events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4205006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42050062014-10-27 Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children? Shneidman, Laura Todd, Roisleen Woodward, Amanda PLoS One Research Article Child-directed cues support imitation of novel actions at 18 months, but not at two years of age. The current studies explore the mechanisms that underlie the propensity that children have to copy others at 18 months, and how the value of child-directed communication changes over development. We ask if attentional allocation accounts for children's failure to imitate observed actions at 18 months, and their success at two years of age, and we explore the informational value child-directed contexts may provide across ontogeny. Eighteen-month-old (Study 1) and two-year-old (Study 2) children viewed causally non-obvious actions performed by child-directed (Study 1 & 2), observed (Study 1 & 2), or non-interactive (Study 2) actors, and their visual attention and imitative behaviors were assessed. Results demonstrated that child-directed contexts supported imitative learning for 18-month-old children, independent of their effects on proximal attention. However, by two years of age, neither directness nor communication between social partners was a necessary condition for supporting social imitation. These findings suggest that developmental changes in children's propensity to extract information from observation cannot be accounted for by changes in children's interpretation of what counts as child-directed information, and are likely not due to changes in how children allocate attention to observed events. Public Library of Science 2014-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4205006/ /pubmed/25333623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110891 Text en © 2014 Shneidman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shneidman, Laura
Todd, Roisleen
Woodward, Amanda
Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?
title Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?
title_full Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?
title_fullStr Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?
title_full_unstemmed Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?
title_short Why Do Child-Directed Interactions Support Imitative Learning in Young Children?
title_sort why do child-directed interactions support imitative learning in young children?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25333623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110891
work_keys_str_mv AT shneidmanlaura whydochilddirectedinteractionssupportimitativelearninginyoungchildren
AT toddroisleen whydochilddirectedinteractionssupportimitativelearninginyoungchildren
AT woodwardamanda whydochilddirectedinteractionssupportimitativelearninginyoungchildren