Cargando…
Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli
BACKGROUND: Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are human intestinal pathogens that are the most frequent causes of bacterial foodborne gastroenteritis in humans in the UK. In this study, we aimed to characterise the metabolic diversity of both C. jejuni and C. coli using a diverse panel of clinical st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25348335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0262-y |
_version_ | 1782342517714321408 |
---|---|
author | Wagley, Sariqa Newcombe, Jane Laing, Emma Yusuf, Emmanuel Sambles, Christine M Studholme, David J La Ragione, Roberto M Titball, Richard W Champion, Olivia L |
author_facet | Wagley, Sariqa Newcombe, Jane Laing, Emma Yusuf, Emmanuel Sambles, Christine M Studholme, David J La Ragione, Roberto M Titball, Richard W Champion, Olivia L |
author_sort | Wagley, Sariqa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are human intestinal pathogens that are the most frequent causes of bacterial foodborne gastroenteritis in humans in the UK. In this study, we aimed to characterise the metabolic diversity of both C. jejuni and C. coli using a diverse panel of clinical strains isolated from the UK, Pakistan and Thailand, thereby representing both the developed and developing world. Our aim was to apply multi genome analysis and Biolog phenotyping to determine differences in carbon source utilisation by C. jejuni and C. coli strains. RESULTS: We have identified a core set of carbon sources (utilised by all strains tested) and a set that are differentially utilised for a diverse panel of thirteen C. jejuni and two C. coli strains. This study used multi genome analysis to show that propionic acid is utilised only by C. coli strains tested. A broader PCR screen of 16 C. coli strains and 42 C. jejuni confirmed the absence of the genes needed for propanoate metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: From our analysis we have identified a phenotypic method and two genotypic methods based on propionic utilisation that might be applicable for distinguishing between C. jejuni and C. coli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-014-0262-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4219013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42190132014-11-05 Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli Wagley, Sariqa Newcombe, Jane Laing, Emma Yusuf, Emmanuel Sambles, Christine M Studholme, David J La Ragione, Roberto M Titball, Richard W Champion, Olivia L BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are human intestinal pathogens that are the most frequent causes of bacterial foodborne gastroenteritis in humans in the UK. In this study, we aimed to characterise the metabolic diversity of both C. jejuni and C. coli using a diverse panel of clinical strains isolated from the UK, Pakistan and Thailand, thereby representing both the developed and developing world. Our aim was to apply multi genome analysis and Biolog phenotyping to determine differences in carbon source utilisation by C. jejuni and C. coli strains. RESULTS: We have identified a core set of carbon sources (utilised by all strains tested) and a set that are differentially utilised for a diverse panel of thirteen C. jejuni and two C. coli strains. This study used multi genome analysis to show that propionic acid is utilised only by C. coli strains tested. A broader PCR screen of 16 C. coli strains and 42 C. jejuni confirmed the absence of the genes needed for propanoate metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: From our analysis we have identified a phenotypic method and two genotypic methods based on propionic utilisation that might be applicable for distinguishing between C. jejuni and C. coli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-014-0262-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4219013/ /pubmed/25348335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0262-y Text en © Wagley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wagley, Sariqa Newcombe, Jane Laing, Emma Yusuf, Emmanuel Sambles, Christine M Studholme, David J La Ragione, Roberto M Titball, Richard W Champion, Olivia L Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli |
title | Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli |
title_full | Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli |
title_fullStr | Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli |
title_short | Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli |
title_sort | differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish campylobacter jejuni from campylobacter coli |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25348335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0262-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagleysariqa differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT newcombejane differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT laingemma differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT yusufemmanuel differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT sambleschristinem differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT studholmedavidj differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT laragionerobertom differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT titballrichardw differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli AT championolivial differencesincarbonsourceutilisationdistinguishcampylobacterjejunifromcampylobactercoli |