Cargando…

Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies

Immune responses are tightly regulated via signaling through numerous co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules. Exploitation of these immune checkpoint pathways is one of the mechanisms by which tumors evade and/or escape the immune system. A growing understanding of the biology of immune checkpoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shih, Kent, Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias, Infante, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-014-0305-6
_version_ 1782343392548618240
author Shih, Kent
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
Infante, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Shih, Kent
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
Infante, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Shih, Kent
collection PubMed
description Immune responses are tightly regulated via signaling through numerous co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules. Exploitation of these immune checkpoint pathways is one of the mechanisms by which tumors evade and/or escape the immune system. A growing understanding of the biology of immune checkpoints and tumor immunology has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies designed to target co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules in order to re-engage the immune system and restore antitumor immune responses. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies were among the first to be tested in the clinic, and ipilimumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for an anticancer indication. Agents targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway, either PD-1 or one of its ligands, programmed death ligand 1, are in active clinical development for numerous cancers, including advanced melanoma and lung cancer. Understanding the different mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and response patterns associated with inhibition of the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways may improve patient management as these therapies are moved in to the clinical practice setting and may also provide a rationale for combination therapy with different inhibitors. Additional immune checkpoint molecules with therapeutic potential, including lymphocyte activation gene-3 and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related gene, also have inhibitors in early stages of clinical development. Clinical responses and safety data reported to date on immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest these agents may have the potential to markedly improve outcomes for patients with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4224737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42247372014-11-12 Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies Shih, Kent Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias Infante, Jeffrey R. Drugs Leading Article Immune responses are tightly regulated via signaling through numerous co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules. Exploitation of these immune checkpoint pathways is one of the mechanisms by which tumors evade and/or escape the immune system. A growing understanding of the biology of immune checkpoints and tumor immunology has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies designed to target co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules in order to re-engage the immune system and restore antitumor immune responses. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies were among the first to be tested in the clinic, and ipilimumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for an anticancer indication. Agents targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway, either PD-1 or one of its ligands, programmed death ligand 1, are in active clinical development for numerous cancers, including advanced melanoma and lung cancer. Understanding the different mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and response patterns associated with inhibition of the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways may improve patient management as these therapies are moved in to the clinical practice setting and may also provide a rationale for combination therapy with different inhibitors. Additional immune checkpoint molecules with therapeutic potential, including lymphocyte activation gene-3 and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related gene, also have inhibitors in early stages of clinical development. Clinical responses and safety data reported to date on immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest these agents may have the potential to markedly improve outcomes for patients with cancer. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-25 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4224737/ /pubmed/25344022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-014-0305-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Leading Article
Shih, Kent
Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
Infante, Jeffrey R.
Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies
title Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies
title_full Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies
title_fullStr Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies
title_short Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer Therapies
title_sort clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors as novel cancer therapies
topic Leading Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-014-0305-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shihkent clinicalimpactofcheckpointinhibitorsasnovelcancertherapies
AT arkenauhendriktobias clinicalimpactofcheckpointinhibitorsasnovelcancertherapies
AT infantejeffreyr clinicalimpactofcheckpointinhibitorsasnovelcancertherapies