Cargando…
Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught. METHODS: The Marseille School of Medicine and ten public secondary schools participated in the study....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25099947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-162 |
_version_ | 1782345199672885248 |
---|---|
author | Bretelle, Florence Shojai, Raha Brunet, Julie Tardieu, Sophie Manca, Marie Christine Durant, Joelle Ricciardi, Claire Boubli, Leon Leonetti, George |
author_facet | Bretelle, Florence Shojai, Raha Brunet, Julie Tardieu, Sophie Manca, Marie Christine Durant, Joelle Ricciardi, Claire Boubli, Leon Leonetti, George |
author_sort | Bretelle, Florence |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught. METHODS: The Marseille School of Medicine and ten public secondary schools participated in the study. Medical students were recruited and trained as peer educators to promote sexual health in the secondary schools. The medical students and secondary school pupils were evaluated before and after education program. The main outcome measure was the sexual health knowledge score on a 20-item questionnaire (maximum score 20). RESULTS: A total of 3350 students attended the peer-led course conducted by 107 medical students. The medical students’ score increased significantly before and after the course (from 15.2 ± 1.8 to 18.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). The knowledge score of the pupils increased (from 7.8 ± 4 to 13.5 ± 4.4; p < 0.001). The girls’ score was significantly higher than the boys’ score after the course, but not before (14.5 ± 3.3 vs 12.5 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Prior to the course, the score among the female medical students was significantly higher than that of the males. The overall knowledge increase was not significantly different between medical students and secondary school pupils (mean 3.1 ± 1 and 5.7 ± 4 respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The program was effective in increasing the knowledge of medical students as well as secondary school pupils. Male sexual health knowledge should be reinforced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4236602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42366022014-11-19 Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? Bretelle, Florence Shojai, Raha Brunet, Julie Tardieu, Sophie Manca, Marie Christine Durant, Joelle Ricciardi, Claire Boubli, Leon Leonetti, George BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught. METHODS: The Marseille School of Medicine and ten public secondary schools participated in the study. Medical students were recruited and trained as peer educators to promote sexual health in the secondary schools. The medical students and secondary school pupils were evaluated before and after education program. The main outcome measure was the sexual health knowledge score on a 20-item questionnaire (maximum score 20). RESULTS: A total of 3350 students attended the peer-led course conducted by 107 medical students. The medical students’ score increased significantly before and after the course (from 15.2 ± 1.8 to 18.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). The knowledge score of the pupils increased (from 7.8 ± 4 to 13.5 ± 4.4; p < 0.001). The girls’ score was significantly higher than the boys’ score after the course, but not before (14.5 ± 3.3 vs 12.5 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Prior to the course, the score among the female medical students was significantly higher than that of the males. The overall knowledge increase was not significantly different between medical students and secondary school pupils (mean 3.1 ± 1 and 5.7 ± 4 respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The program was effective in increasing the knowledge of medical students as well as secondary school pupils. Male sexual health knowledge should be reinforced. BioMed Central 2014-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4236602/ /pubmed/25099947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-162 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bretelle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bretelle, Florence Shojai, Raha Brunet, Julie Tardieu, Sophie Manca, Marie Christine Durant, Joelle Ricciardi, Claire Boubli, Leon Leonetti, George Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
title | Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
title_full | Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
title_fullStr | Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
title_short | Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
title_sort | medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25099947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bretelleflorence medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT shojairaha medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT brunetjulie medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT tardieusophie medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT mancamariechristine medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT durantjoelle medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT ricciardiclaire medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT boublileon medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore AT leonettigeorge medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore |