Cargando…

Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?

BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught. METHODS: The Marseille School of Medicine and ten public secondary schools participated in the study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bretelle, Florence, Shojai, Raha, Brunet, Julie, Tardieu, Sophie, Manca, Marie Christine, Durant, Joelle, Ricciardi, Claire, Boubli, Leon, Leonetti, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25099947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-162
_version_ 1782345199672885248
author Bretelle, Florence
Shojai, Raha
Brunet, Julie
Tardieu, Sophie
Manca, Marie Christine
Durant, Joelle
Ricciardi, Claire
Boubli, Leon
Leonetti, George
author_facet Bretelle, Florence
Shojai, Raha
Brunet, Julie
Tardieu, Sophie
Manca, Marie Christine
Durant, Joelle
Ricciardi, Claire
Boubli, Leon
Leonetti, George
author_sort Bretelle, Florence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught. METHODS: The Marseille School of Medicine and ten public secondary schools participated in the study. Medical students were recruited and trained as peer educators to promote sexual health in the secondary schools. The medical students and secondary school pupils were evaluated before and after education program. The main outcome measure was the sexual health knowledge score on a 20-item questionnaire (maximum score 20). RESULTS: A total of 3350 students attended the peer-led course conducted by 107 medical students. The medical students’ score increased significantly before and after the course (from 15.2 ± 1.8 to 18.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). The knowledge score of the pupils increased (from 7.8 ± 4 to 13.5 ± 4.4; p < 0.001). The girls’ score was significantly higher than the boys’ score after the course, but not before (14.5 ± 3.3 vs 12.5 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Prior to the course, the score among the female medical students was significantly higher than that of the males. The overall knowledge increase was not significantly different between medical students and secondary school pupils (mean 3.1 ± 1 and 5.7 ± 4 respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The program was effective in increasing the knowledge of medical students as well as secondary school pupils. Male sexual health knowledge should be reinforced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4236602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42366022014-11-19 Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more? Bretelle, Florence Shojai, Raha Brunet, Julie Tardieu, Sophie Manca, Marie Christine Durant, Joelle Ricciardi, Claire Boubli, Leon Leonetti, George BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught. METHODS: The Marseille School of Medicine and ten public secondary schools participated in the study. Medical students were recruited and trained as peer educators to promote sexual health in the secondary schools. The medical students and secondary school pupils were evaluated before and after education program. The main outcome measure was the sexual health knowledge score on a 20-item questionnaire (maximum score 20). RESULTS: A total of 3350 students attended the peer-led course conducted by 107 medical students. The medical students’ score increased significantly before and after the course (from 15.2 ± 1.8 to 18.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). The knowledge score of the pupils increased (from 7.8 ± 4 to 13.5 ± 4.4; p < 0.001). The girls’ score was significantly higher than the boys’ score after the course, but not before (14.5 ± 3.3 vs 12.5 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Prior to the course, the score among the female medical students was significantly higher than that of the males. The overall knowledge increase was not significantly different between medical students and secondary school pupils (mean 3.1 ± 1 and 5.7 ± 4 respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The program was effective in increasing the knowledge of medical students as well as secondary school pupils. Male sexual health knowledge should be reinforced. BioMed Central 2014-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4236602/ /pubmed/25099947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-162 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bretelle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bretelle, Florence
Shojai, Raha
Brunet, Julie
Tardieu, Sophie
Manca, Marie Christine
Durant, Joelle
Ricciardi, Claire
Boubli, Leon
Leonetti, George
Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
title Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
title_full Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
title_fullStr Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
title_full_unstemmed Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
title_short Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
title_sort medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25099947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-162
work_keys_str_mv AT bretelleflorence medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT shojairaha medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT brunetjulie medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT tardieusophie medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT mancamariechristine medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT durantjoelle medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT ricciardiclaire medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT boublileon medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore
AT leonettigeorge medicalstudentsassexualhealthpeereducatorswhobenefitsmore