Cargando…

Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists

BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous compounds that interfere with the endocrine system of vertebrates, often through direct or indirect interactions with nuclear receptor proteins. Estrogen receptors (ERs) are particularly important protein targets and many EDCs are ER bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Hui Wen, Zhang, Wenqian, Shu, Mao, Luo, Heng, Ge, Weigong, Perkins, Roger, Tong, Weida, Hong, Huixiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25349983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S11-S4
_version_ 1782346994521473024
author Ng, Hui Wen
Zhang, Wenqian
Shu, Mao
Luo, Heng
Ge, Weigong
Perkins, Roger
Tong, Weida
Hong, Huixiao
author_facet Ng, Hui Wen
Zhang, Wenqian
Shu, Mao
Luo, Heng
Ge, Weigong
Perkins, Roger
Tong, Weida
Hong, Huixiao
author_sort Ng, Hui Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous compounds that interfere with the endocrine system of vertebrates, often through direct or indirect interactions with nuclear receptor proteins. Estrogen receptors (ERs) are particularly important protein targets and many EDCs are ER binders, capable of altering normal homeostatic transcription and signaling pathways. An estrogenic xenobiotic can bind ER as either an agonist or antagonist to increase or inhibit transcription, respectively. The receptor conformations in the complexes of ER bound with agonists and antagonists are different and dependent on interactions with co-regulator proteins that vary across tissue type. Assessment of chemical endocrine disruption potential depends not only on binding affinity to ERs, but also on changes that may alter the receptor conformation and its ability to subsequently bind DNA response elements and initiate transcription. Using both agonist and antagonist conformations of the ERα, we developed an in silico approach that can be used to differentiate agonist versus antagonist status of potential binders. METHODS: The approach combined separate molecular docking models for ER agonist and antagonist conformations. The ability of this approach to differentiate agonists and antagonists was first evaluated using true agonists and antagonists extracted from the crystal structures available in the protein data bank (PDB), and then further validated using a larger set of ligands from the literature. The usefulness of the approach was demonstrated with enrichment analysis in data sets with a large number of decoy ligands. RESULTS: The performance of individual agonist and antagonist docking models was found comparable to similar models in the literature. When combined in a competitive docking approach, they provided the ability to discriminate agonists from antagonists with good accuracy, as well as the ability to efficiently select true agonists and antagonists from decoys during enrichment analysis. CONCLUSION: This approach enables evaluation of potential ER biological function changes caused by chemicals bound to the receptor which, in turn, allows the assessment of a chemical's endocrine disrupting potential. The approach can be used not only by regulatory authorities to perform risk assessments on potential EDCs but also by the industry in drug discovery projects to screen for potential agonists and antagonists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42510482014-12-04 Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists Ng, Hui Wen Zhang, Wenqian Shu, Mao Luo, Heng Ge, Weigong Perkins, Roger Tong, Weida Hong, Huixiao BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous compounds that interfere with the endocrine system of vertebrates, often through direct or indirect interactions with nuclear receptor proteins. Estrogen receptors (ERs) are particularly important protein targets and many EDCs are ER binders, capable of altering normal homeostatic transcription and signaling pathways. An estrogenic xenobiotic can bind ER as either an agonist or antagonist to increase or inhibit transcription, respectively. The receptor conformations in the complexes of ER bound with agonists and antagonists are different and dependent on interactions with co-regulator proteins that vary across tissue type. Assessment of chemical endocrine disruption potential depends not only on binding affinity to ERs, but also on changes that may alter the receptor conformation and its ability to subsequently bind DNA response elements and initiate transcription. Using both agonist and antagonist conformations of the ERα, we developed an in silico approach that can be used to differentiate agonist versus antagonist status of potential binders. METHODS: The approach combined separate molecular docking models for ER agonist and antagonist conformations. The ability of this approach to differentiate agonists and antagonists was first evaluated using true agonists and antagonists extracted from the crystal structures available in the protein data bank (PDB), and then further validated using a larger set of ligands from the literature. The usefulness of the approach was demonstrated with enrichment analysis in data sets with a large number of decoy ligands. RESULTS: The performance of individual agonist and antagonist docking models was found comparable to similar models in the literature. When combined in a competitive docking approach, they provided the ability to discriminate agonists from antagonists with good accuracy, as well as the ability to efficiently select true agonists and antagonists from decoys during enrichment analysis. CONCLUSION: This approach enables evaluation of potential ER biological function changes caused by chemicals bound to the receptor which, in turn, allows the assessment of a chemical's endocrine disrupting potential. The approach can be used not only by regulatory authorities to perform risk assessments on potential EDCs but also by the industry in drug discovery projects to screen for potential agonists and antagonists. BioMed Central 2014-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4251048/ /pubmed/25349983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S11-S4 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Ng, Hui Wen
Zhang, Wenqian
Shu, Mao
Luo, Heng
Ge, Weigong
Perkins, Roger
Tong, Weida
Hong, Huixiao
Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
title Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
title_full Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
title_fullStr Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
title_full_unstemmed Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
title_short Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
title_sort competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25349983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S11-S4
work_keys_str_mv AT nghuiwen competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT zhangwenqian competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT shumao competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT luoheng competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT geweigong competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT perkinsroger competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT tongweida competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists
AT honghuixiao competitivemoleculardockingapproachforpredictingestrogenreceptorsubtypeaagonistsandantagonists