Cargando…

Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?

INTRODUCTION: Mounting evidence suggests that high-fidelity mannequin-based (HFMBS) and computer-based simulation are useful adjunctive educational tools for advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) instruction. We sought to determine whether access to a supplemental, online computer-based ACLS simulato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nacca, Nicholas, Holliday, Jordan, Ko, Paul Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493153
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.9.20149
_version_ 1782347026391891968
author Nacca, Nicholas
Holliday, Jordan
Ko, Paul Y.
author_facet Nacca, Nicholas
Holliday, Jordan
Ko, Paul Y.
author_sort Nacca, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mounting evidence suggests that high-fidelity mannequin-based (HFMBS) and computer-based simulation are useful adjunctive educational tools for advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) instruction. We sought to determine whether access to a supplemental, online computer-based ACLS simulator would improve students’ performance on a standardized Mega Code using high-fidelity mannequin based simulation (HFMBS). METHODS: Sixty-five third-year medical students were randomized. Intervention group subjects (n = 29) each received a two-week access code to the online ACLS simulator, whereas the control group subjects (n = 36) did not. Primary outcome measures included students’ time to initiate chest compressions, defibrillate ventricular fibrillation, and pace symptomatic bradycardia. Secondary outcome measures included students’ subjective self-assessment of ACLS knowledge and confidence. RESULTS: Students with access to the online simulator on average defibrillated ventricular fibrillation in 112 seconds, whereas those without defibrillated in 149.9 seconds, an average of 38 seconds faster [p<.05]. Similarly, those with access to the simulator paced symptomatic bradycardia on average in 95.14 seconds whereas those without access paced on average 154.9 seconds a difference of 59.81 seconds [p<.05]. On a subjective 5-point scale, there was no difference in self-assessment of ACLS knowledge between the control (mean 3.3) versus intervention (mean 3.1) [p-value =.21]. Despite having outperformed the control group subjects in the standardized Mega Code test scenario, the intervention group felt less confident on a 5-point scale (mean 2.5) than the control group. (mean 3.2) [p<.05] CONCLUSION: The reduction in time to defibrillate ventricular fibrillation and to pace symptomatic bradycardia among the intervention group subjects suggests that the online computer-based ACLS simulator is an effective adjunctive ACLS instructional tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42512542014-12-09 Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance? Nacca, Nicholas Holliday, Jordan Ko, Paul Y. West J Emerg Med Education INTRODUCTION: Mounting evidence suggests that high-fidelity mannequin-based (HFMBS) and computer-based simulation are useful adjunctive educational tools for advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) instruction. We sought to determine whether access to a supplemental, online computer-based ACLS simulator would improve students’ performance on a standardized Mega Code using high-fidelity mannequin based simulation (HFMBS). METHODS: Sixty-five third-year medical students were randomized. Intervention group subjects (n = 29) each received a two-week access code to the online ACLS simulator, whereas the control group subjects (n = 36) did not. Primary outcome measures included students’ time to initiate chest compressions, defibrillate ventricular fibrillation, and pace symptomatic bradycardia. Secondary outcome measures included students’ subjective self-assessment of ACLS knowledge and confidence. RESULTS: Students with access to the online simulator on average defibrillated ventricular fibrillation in 112 seconds, whereas those without defibrillated in 149.9 seconds, an average of 38 seconds faster [p<.05]. Similarly, those with access to the simulator paced symptomatic bradycardia on average in 95.14 seconds whereas those without access paced on average 154.9 seconds a difference of 59.81 seconds [p<.05]. On a subjective 5-point scale, there was no difference in self-assessment of ACLS knowledge between the control (mean 3.3) versus intervention (mean 3.1) [p-value =.21]. Despite having outperformed the control group subjects in the standardized Mega Code test scenario, the intervention group felt less confident on a 5-point scale (mean 2.5) than the control group. (mean 3.2) [p<.05] CONCLUSION: The reduction in time to defibrillate ventricular fibrillation and to pace symptomatic bradycardia among the intervention group subjects suggests that the online computer-based ACLS simulator is an effective adjunctive ACLS instructional tool. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2014-11 2014-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4251254/ /pubmed/25493153 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.9.20149 Text en Copyright © 2014 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Education
Nacca, Nicholas
Holliday, Jordan
Ko, Paul Y.
Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?
title Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?
title_full Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?
title_fullStr Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?
title_short Randomized Trial of a Novel ACLS Teaching Tool: Does it Improve Student Performance?
title_sort randomized trial of a novel acls teaching tool: does it improve student performance?
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493153
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.9.20149
work_keys_str_mv AT naccanicholas randomizedtrialofanovelaclsteachingtooldoesitimprovestudentperformance
AT hollidayjordan randomizedtrialofanovelaclsteachingtooldoesitimprovestudentperformance
AT kopauly randomizedtrialofanovelaclsteachingtooldoesitimprovestudentperformance