Cargando…

Random intercept EFA of personality scales

Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aichholzer, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001
_version_ 1782347091808354304
author Aichholzer, Julian
author_facet Aichholzer, Julian
author_sort Aichholzer, Julian
collection PubMed
description Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” factorial structure. Random Intercept EFA (RI-EFA) captures acquiescence as well as the complex item-factor structure typical for personality measures. It is applied to the NEO-FFI and the BFI scale to test whether an accurate model-to-data fit can be achieved and whether the “clarity” of the factorial structure improves. The results lend confidence in the general effectiveness of RI-EFA whenever acquiescence bias is an issue. Example Mplus code is provided for replication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42517872014-12-03 Random intercept EFA of personality scales Aichholzer, Julian J Res Pers Brief Report Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” factorial structure. Random Intercept EFA (RI-EFA) captures acquiescence as well as the complex item-factor structure typical for personality measures. It is applied to the NEO-FFI and the BFI scale to test whether an accurate model-to-data fit can be achieved and whether the “clarity” of the factorial structure improves. The results lend confidence in the general effectiveness of RI-EFA whenever acquiescence bias is an issue. Example Mplus code is provided for replication. Academic Press 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4251787/ /pubmed/25484472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001 Text en © 2014 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
Aichholzer, Julian
Random intercept EFA of personality scales
title Random intercept EFA of personality scales
title_full Random intercept EFA of personality scales
title_fullStr Random intercept EFA of personality scales
title_full_unstemmed Random intercept EFA of personality scales
title_short Random intercept EFA of personality scales
title_sort random intercept efa of personality scales
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT aichholzerjulian randominterceptefaofpersonalityscales