Cargando…
Random intercept EFA of personality scales
Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” fa...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001 |
_version_ | 1782347091808354304 |
---|---|
author | Aichholzer, Julian |
author_facet | Aichholzer, Julian |
author_sort | Aichholzer, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” factorial structure. Random Intercept EFA (RI-EFA) captures acquiescence as well as the complex item-factor structure typical for personality measures. It is applied to the NEO-FFI and the BFI scale to test whether an accurate model-to-data fit can be achieved and whether the “clarity” of the factorial structure improves. The results lend confidence in the general effectiveness of RI-EFA whenever acquiescence bias is an issue. Example Mplus code is provided for replication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4251787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42517872014-12-03 Random intercept EFA of personality scales Aichholzer, Julian J Res Pers Brief Report Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” factorial structure. Random Intercept EFA (RI-EFA) captures acquiescence as well as the complex item-factor structure typical for personality measures. It is applied to the NEO-FFI and the BFI scale to test whether an accurate model-to-data fit can be achieved and whether the “clarity” of the factorial structure improves. The results lend confidence in the general effectiveness of RI-EFA whenever acquiescence bias is an issue. Example Mplus code is provided for replication. Academic Press 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4251787/ /pubmed/25484472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001 Text en © 2014 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Aichholzer, Julian Random intercept EFA of personality scales |
title | Random intercept EFA of personality scales |
title_full | Random intercept EFA of personality scales |
title_fullStr | Random intercept EFA of personality scales |
title_full_unstemmed | Random intercept EFA of personality scales |
title_short | Random intercept EFA of personality scales |
title_sort | random intercept efa of personality scales |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aichholzerjulian randominterceptefaofpersonalityscales |