Cargando…

Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Mentoring as a knowledge translation (KT) intervention uses social influence among healthcare professionals to increase use of evidence in clinical practice. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of mentoring as a KT intervention designed to increase healthcare professionals’ use of eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdullah, Ghadah, Rossy, Dianne, Ploeg, Jenny, Davies, Barbara, Higuchi, Kathryn, Sikora, Lindsey, Stacey, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12060
_version_ 1782351548530032640
author Abdullah, Ghadah
Rossy, Dianne
Ploeg, Jenny
Davies, Barbara
Higuchi, Kathryn
Sikora, Lindsey
Stacey, Dawn
author_facet Abdullah, Ghadah
Rossy, Dianne
Ploeg, Jenny
Davies, Barbara
Higuchi, Kathryn
Sikora, Lindsey
Stacey, Dawn
author_sort Abdullah, Ghadah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mentoring as a knowledge translation (KT) intervention uses social influence among healthcare professionals to increase use of evidence in clinical practice. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of mentoring as a KT intervention designed to increase healthcare professionals’ use of evidence in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, CINAHL), grey literature, and hand searching. Eligible studies evaluated mentoring of healthcare professionals responsible for patient care to enhance the uptake of evidence into practice. Mentoring is defined as (a) a mentor more experienced than mentee; (b) individualized support based on mentee's needs; and (c) involved in an interpersonal relationship as indicated by mutual benefit, engagement, and commitment. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility, extracted data, and appraised quality of studies. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Of 10,669 citations from 1988 to 2012, 10 studies were eligible. Mentoring as a KT intervention was evaluated in Canada, USA, and Australia. Exposure to mentoring compared to no mentoring improved some behavioral outcomes (one study). Compared to controls or other multifaceted interventions, multifaceted interventions with mentoring improved practitioners’ knowledge (four of five studies), beliefs (four of six studies), and impact on organizational outcomes (three of four studies). There were mixed findings for changes in professionals’ behaviors and impact on practitioners’ and patients’ outcomes: some outcomes improved, while others showed no difference. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Only one study evaluated the effectiveness of mentoring alone as a KT intervention and showed improvement in some behavioral outcomes. The other nine studies that evaluated the effectiveness of mentoring as part of a multifaceted intervention showed mixed findings, making it difficult to determine the added effect of mentoring. Further research is needed to identify effective mentoring as a KT intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4285206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42852062015-01-26 Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review Abdullah, Ghadah Rossy, Dianne Ploeg, Jenny Davies, Barbara Higuchi, Kathryn Sikora, Lindsey Stacey, Dawn Worldviews Evid Based Nurs Original Article BACKGROUND: Mentoring as a knowledge translation (KT) intervention uses social influence among healthcare professionals to increase use of evidence in clinical practice. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of mentoring as a KT intervention designed to increase healthcare professionals’ use of evidence in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, CINAHL), grey literature, and hand searching. Eligible studies evaluated mentoring of healthcare professionals responsible for patient care to enhance the uptake of evidence into practice. Mentoring is defined as (a) a mentor more experienced than mentee; (b) individualized support based on mentee's needs; and (c) involved in an interpersonal relationship as indicated by mutual benefit, engagement, and commitment. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility, extracted data, and appraised quality of studies. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Of 10,669 citations from 1988 to 2012, 10 studies were eligible. Mentoring as a KT intervention was evaluated in Canada, USA, and Australia. Exposure to mentoring compared to no mentoring improved some behavioral outcomes (one study). Compared to controls or other multifaceted interventions, multifaceted interventions with mentoring improved practitioners’ knowledge (four of five studies), beliefs (four of six studies), and impact on organizational outcomes (three of four studies). There were mixed findings for changes in professionals’ behaviors and impact on practitioners’ and patients’ outcomes: some outcomes improved, while others showed no difference. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Only one study evaluated the effectiveness of mentoring alone as a KT intervention and showed improvement in some behavioral outcomes. The other nine studies that evaluated the effectiveness of mentoring as part of a multifaceted intervention showed mixed findings, making it difficult to determine the added effect of mentoring. Further research is needed to identify effective mentoring as a KT intervention. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4285206/ /pubmed/25252002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12060 Text en © 2014 The Authors Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International The Honor Society of Nursing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdullah, Ghadah
Rossy, Dianne
Ploeg, Jenny
Davies, Barbara
Higuchi, Kathryn
Sikora, Lindsey
Stacey, Dawn
Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review
title Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_full Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_short Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_sort measuring the effectiveness of mentoring as a knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25252002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12060
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahghadah measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview
AT rossydianne measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview
AT ploegjenny measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview
AT daviesbarbara measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview
AT higuchikathryn measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview
AT sikoralindsey measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview
AT staceydawn measuringtheeffectivenessofmentoringasaknowledgetranslationinterventionforimplementingempiricalevidenceasystematicreview