Cargando…

Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation

The meals from many oilseed crops have potential for biofumigation due to their release of biocidal compounds such as isothiocyanates (ITCs). Various ITCs are known to inhibit numerous pathogens; however, much less is known about how the soil microbial community responds to the different types of IT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Ping, Hollister, Emily B., Somenahally, Anilkumar C., Hons, Frank M., Gentry, Terry J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00729
_version_ 1782351895028826112
author Hu, Ping
Hollister, Emily B.
Somenahally, Anilkumar C.
Hons, Frank M.
Gentry, Terry J.
author_facet Hu, Ping
Hollister, Emily B.
Somenahally, Anilkumar C.
Hons, Frank M.
Gentry, Terry J.
author_sort Hu, Ping
collection PubMed
description The meals from many oilseed crops have potential for biofumigation due to their release of biocidal compounds such as isothiocyanates (ITCs). Various ITCs are known to inhibit numerous pathogens; however, much less is known about how the soil microbial community responds to the different types of ITCs released from oilseed meals (SMs). To simulate applying ITC-releasing SMs to soil, we amended soil with 1% flax SM (contains no biocidal chemicals) along with four types of ITCs (allyl, butyl, phenyl, and benzyl ITC) in order to determine their effects on soil fungal and bacterial communities in a replicated microcosm study. Microbial communities were analyzed based on the ITS region for fungi and 16S rRNA gene for bacteria using qPCR and tag-pyrosequencing with 454 GS FLX titanium technology. A dramatic decrease in fungal populations (~85% reduction) was observed after allyl ITC addition. Fungal community compositions also shifted following ITC amendments (e.g., Humicola increased in allyl and Mortierella in butyl ITC amendments). Bacterial populations were less impacted by ITCs, although there was a transient increase in the proportion of Firmicutes, related to bacteria know to be antagonistic to plant pathogens, following amendment with allyl ITC. Our results indicate that the type of ITC released from SMs can result in differential impacts on soil microorganisms. This information will aid selection and breeding of plants for biofumigation-based control of soil-borne pathogens while minimizing the impacts on non-target microorganisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4288022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42880222015-02-23 Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation Hu, Ping Hollister, Emily B. Somenahally, Anilkumar C. Hons, Frank M. Gentry, Terry J. Front Microbiol Microbiology The meals from many oilseed crops have potential for biofumigation due to their release of biocidal compounds such as isothiocyanates (ITCs). Various ITCs are known to inhibit numerous pathogens; however, much less is known about how the soil microbial community responds to the different types of ITCs released from oilseed meals (SMs). To simulate applying ITC-releasing SMs to soil, we amended soil with 1% flax SM (contains no biocidal chemicals) along with four types of ITCs (allyl, butyl, phenyl, and benzyl ITC) in order to determine their effects on soil fungal and bacterial communities in a replicated microcosm study. Microbial communities were analyzed based on the ITS region for fungi and 16S rRNA gene for bacteria using qPCR and tag-pyrosequencing with 454 GS FLX titanium technology. A dramatic decrease in fungal populations (~85% reduction) was observed after allyl ITC addition. Fungal community compositions also shifted following ITC amendments (e.g., Humicola increased in allyl and Mortierella in butyl ITC amendments). Bacterial populations were less impacted by ITCs, although there was a transient increase in the proportion of Firmicutes, related to bacteria know to be antagonistic to plant pathogens, following amendment with allyl ITC. Our results indicate that the type of ITC released from SMs can result in differential impacts on soil microorganisms. This information will aid selection and breeding of plants for biofumigation-based control of soil-borne pathogens while minimizing the impacts on non-target microorganisms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4288022/ /pubmed/25709600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00729 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hu, Hollister, Somenahally, Hons and Gentry. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Hu, Ping
Hollister, Emily B.
Somenahally, Anilkumar C.
Hons, Frank M.
Gentry, Terry J.
Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
title Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
title_full Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
title_fullStr Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
title_full_unstemmed Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
title_short Soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
title_sort soil bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to various isothiocyanates added for biofumigation
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00729
work_keys_str_mv AT huping soilbacterialandfungalcommunitiesresponddifferentlytovariousisothiocyanatesaddedforbiofumigation
AT hollisteremilyb soilbacterialandfungalcommunitiesresponddifferentlytovariousisothiocyanatesaddedforbiofumigation
AT somenahallyanilkumarc soilbacterialandfungalcommunitiesresponddifferentlytovariousisothiocyanatesaddedforbiofumigation
AT honsfrankm soilbacterialandfungalcommunitiesresponddifferentlytovariousisothiocyanatesaddedforbiofumigation
AT gentryterryj soilbacterialandfungalcommunitiesresponddifferentlytovariousisothiocyanatesaddedforbiofumigation