Cargando…
Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation
BACKGROUND: This paper describes the process, our experience and the lessons learnt in doing document reviews of health science curricula. Since we could not find relevant literature to guide us on how to approach these reviews, we feel that sharing our experience would benefit researchers embarking...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-236 |
_version_ | 1782352057746849792 |
---|---|
author | Rohwer, Anke Schoonees, Anel Young, Taryn |
author_facet | Rohwer, Anke Schoonees, Anel Young, Taryn |
author_sort | Rohwer, Anke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper describes the process, our experience and the lessons learnt in doing document reviews of health science curricula. Since we could not find relevant literature to guide us on how to approach these reviews, we feel that sharing our experience would benefit researchers embarking on similar projects. METHODS: We followed a rigorous, transparent, pre-specified approach that included the preparation of a protocol, a pre-piloted data extraction form and coding schedule. Data were extracted, analysed and synthesised. Quality checks were included at all stages of the process. RESULTS: The main lessons we learnt related to time and project management, continuous quality assurance, selecting the software that meets the needs of the project, involving experts as needed and disseminating the findings to relevant stakeholders. CONCLUSION: A complete curriculum evaluation comprises, apart from a document review, interviews with students and lecturers to assess the learnt and taught curricula respectively. Rigorous methods must be used to ensure an objective assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4289170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42891702015-01-11 Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation Rohwer, Anke Schoonees, Anel Young, Taryn BMC Med Educ Technical Advance BACKGROUND: This paper describes the process, our experience and the lessons learnt in doing document reviews of health science curricula. Since we could not find relevant literature to guide us on how to approach these reviews, we feel that sharing our experience would benefit researchers embarking on similar projects. METHODS: We followed a rigorous, transparent, pre-specified approach that included the preparation of a protocol, a pre-piloted data extraction form and coding schedule. Data were extracted, analysed and synthesised. Quality checks were included at all stages of the process. RESULTS: The main lessons we learnt related to time and project management, continuous quality assurance, selecting the software that meets the needs of the project, involving experts as needed and disseminating the findings to relevant stakeholders. CONCLUSION: A complete curriculum evaluation comprises, apart from a document review, interviews with students and lecturers to assess the learnt and taught curricula respectively. Rigorous methods must be used to ensure an objective assessment. BioMed Central 2014-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4289170/ /pubmed/25363307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-236 Text en © Rohwer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Rohwer, Anke Schoonees, Anel Young, Taryn Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
title | Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
title_full | Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
title_fullStr | Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
title_short | Methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
title_sort | methods used and lessons learnt in conducting document reviews of medical and allied health curricula – a key step in curriculum evaluation |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohweranke methodsusedandlessonslearntinconductingdocumentreviewsofmedicalandalliedhealthcurriculaakeystepincurriculumevaluation AT schooneesanel methodsusedandlessonslearntinconductingdocumentreviewsofmedicalandalliedhealthcurriculaakeystepincurriculumevaluation AT youngtaryn methodsusedandlessonslearntinconductingdocumentreviewsofmedicalandalliedhealthcurriculaakeystepincurriculumevaluation |