Cargando…
Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
The main purpose of investigational phase II clinical trials is to explore indications and effective doses. However, as yet, there is no clear rule and no related published literature about the precise suitable sample sizes to be used in phase II clinical trials. To explore this, we searched for cli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25609916 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S76135 |
_version_ | 1782352743792377856 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ji-Han Su, Qian-Min Yang, Juan Lv, Ying-Hua He, Ying-Chun Chen, Jun-Chao Xu, Ling Wang, Kun Zheng, Qing-Shan |
author_facet | Huang, Ji-Han Su, Qian-Min Yang, Juan Lv, Ying-Hua He, Ying-Chun Chen, Jun-Chao Xu, Ling Wang, Kun Zheng, Qing-Shan |
author_sort | Huang, Ji-Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main purpose of investigational phase II clinical trials is to explore indications and effective doses. However, as yet, there is no clear rule and no related published literature about the precise suitable sample sizes to be used in phase II clinical trials. To explore this, we searched for clinical trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry using the keywords “dose-finding” or “dose–response” and “Phase II”. The time span of the search was September 20, 1999, to December 31, 2013. A total of 2103 clinical trials were finally included in our review. Regarding sample sizes, 1,156 clinical trials had <40 participants in each group, accounting for 55.0% of the studies reviewed, and only 17.2% of the studies reviewed had >100 patient cases in a single group. Sample sizes used in parallel study designs tended to be larger than those of crossover designs (median sample size 151 and 37, respectively). In conclusion, in the earlier phases of drug research and development, there are a variety of designs for dosage investigational studies. The sample size of each trial should be comprehensively considered and selected according to the study design and purpose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4294651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42946512015-01-21 Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation Huang, Ji-Han Su, Qian-Min Yang, Juan Lv, Ying-Hua He, Ying-Chun Chen, Jun-Chao Xu, Ling Wang, Kun Zheng, Qing-Shan Drug Des Devel Ther Review The main purpose of investigational phase II clinical trials is to explore indications and effective doses. However, as yet, there is no clear rule and no related published literature about the precise suitable sample sizes to be used in phase II clinical trials. To explore this, we searched for clinical trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry using the keywords “dose-finding” or “dose–response” and “Phase II”. The time span of the search was September 20, 1999, to December 31, 2013. A total of 2103 clinical trials were finally included in our review. Regarding sample sizes, 1,156 clinical trials had <40 participants in each group, accounting for 55.0% of the studies reviewed, and only 17.2% of the studies reviewed had >100 patient cases in a single group. Sample sizes used in parallel study designs tended to be larger than those of crossover designs (median sample size 151 and 37, respectively). In conclusion, in the earlier phases of drug research and development, there are a variety of designs for dosage investigational studies. The sample size of each trial should be comprehensively considered and selected according to the study design and purpose. Dove Medical Press 2015-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4294651/ /pubmed/25609916 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S76135 Text en © 2015 Huang et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Huang, Ji-Han Su, Qian-Min Yang, Juan Lv, Ying-Hua He, Ying-Chun Chen, Jun-Chao Xu, Ling Wang, Kun Zheng, Qing-Shan Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
title | Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
title_full | Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
title_fullStr | Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
title_short | Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
title_sort | sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25609916 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S76135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangjihan samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT suqianmin samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT yangjuan samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT lvyinghua samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT heyingchun samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT chenjunchao samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT xuling samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT wangkun samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation AT zhengqingshan samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation |