Cargando…

Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation

The main purpose of investigational phase II clinical trials is to explore indications and effective doses. However, as yet, there is no clear rule and no related published literature about the precise suitable sample sizes to be used in phase II clinical trials. To explore this, we searched for cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ji-Han, Su, Qian-Min, Yang, Juan, Lv, Ying-Hua, He, Ying-Chun, Chen, Jun-Chao, Xu, Ling, Wang, Kun, Zheng, Qing-Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25609916
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S76135
_version_ 1782352743792377856
author Huang, Ji-Han
Su, Qian-Min
Yang, Juan
Lv, Ying-Hua
He, Ying-Chun
Chen, Jun-Chao
Xu, Ling
Wang, Kun
Zheng, Qing-Shan
author_facet Huang, Ji-Han
Su, Qian-Min
Yang, Juan
Lv, Ying-Hua
He, Ying-Chun
Chen, Jun-Chao
Xu, Ling
Wang, Kun
Zheng, Qing-Shan
author_sort Huang, Ji-Han
collection PubMed
description The main purpose of investigational phase II clinical trials is to explore indications and effective doses. However, as yet, there is no clear rule and no related published literature about the precise suitable sample sizes to be used in phase II clinical trials. To explore this, we searched for clinical trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry using the keywords “dose-finding” or “dose–response” and “Phase II”. The time span of the search was September 20, 1999, to December 31, 2013. A total of 2103 clinical trials were finally included in our review. Regarding sample sizes, 1,156 clinical trials had <40 participants in each group, accounting for 55.0% of the studies reviewed, and only 17.2% of the studies reviewed had >100 patient cases in a single group. Sample sizes used in parallel study designs tended to be larger than those of crossover designs (median sample size 151 and 37, respectively). In conclusion, in the earlier phases of drug research and development, there are a variety of designs for dosage investigational studies. The sample size of each trial should be comprehensively considered and selected according to the study design and purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4294651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42946512015-01-21 Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation Huang, Ji-Han Su, Qian-Min Yang, Juan Lv, Ying-Hua He, Ying-Chun Chen, Jun-Chao Xu, Ling Wang, Kun Zheng, Qing-Shan Drug Des Devel Ther Review The main purpose of investigational phase II clinical trials is to explore indications and effective doses. However, as yet, there is no clear rule and no related published literature about the precise suitable sample sizes to be used in phase II clinical trials. To explore this, we searched for clinical trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry using the keywords “dose-finding” or “dose–response” and “Phase II”. The time span of the search was September 20, 1999, to December 31, 2013. A total of 2103 clinical trials were finally included in our review. Regarding sample sizes, 1,156 clinical trials had <40 participants in each group, accounting for 55.0% of the studies reviewed, and only 17.2% of the studies reviewed had >100 patient cases in a single group. Sample sizes used in parallel study designs tended to be larger than those of crossover designs (median sample size 151 and 37, respectively). In conclusion, in the earlier phases of drug research and development, there are a variety of designs for dosage investigational studies. The sample size of each trial should be comprehensively considered and selected according to the study design and purpose. Dove Medical Press 2015-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4294651/ /pubmed/25609916 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S76135 Text en © 2015 Huang et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Huang, Ji-Han
Su, Qian-Min
Yang, Juan
Lv, Ying-Hua
He, Ying-Chun
Chen, Jun-Chao
Xu, Ling
Wang, Kun
Zheng, Qing-Shan
Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
title Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
title_full Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
title_fullStr Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
title_short Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
title_sort sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25609916
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S76135
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjihan samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT suqianmin samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT yangjuan samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT lvyinghua samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT heyingchun samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT chenjunchao samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT xuling samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT wangkun samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation
AT zhengqingshan samplesizesindosageinvestigationalclinicaltrialsasystematicevaluation