Cargando…
Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society for Cell Biology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994 |
_version_ | 1782352750828322816 |
---|---|
author | Gotoh, Tetsuya Vila-Caballer, Marian Liu, Jingjing Schiffhauer, Samuel Finkielstein, Carla V. |
author_facet | Gotoh, Tetsuya Vila-Caballer, Marian Liu, Jingjing Schiffhauer, Samuel Finkielstein, Carla V. |
author_sort | Gotoh, Tetsuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased hp53 stability by blocking Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and transcription of hp53 target genes. Because of the relevance of hp53 in checkpoint signaling, we hypothesize that hPer2 association with hp53 acts as a regulatory module that influences hp53's downstream response to genotoxic stress. Unlike the trimeric complex, whose distribution was confined to the nuclear compartment, hPer2/hp53 was identified in both cytosol and nucleus. At the transcriptional level, a reporter containing the hp21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter, a target of hp53, remained inactive in cells expressing a stable form of the hPer2/hp53 complex even when treated with γ-radiation. Finally, we established that hPer2 directly acts on the hp53 node, as checkpoint components upstream of hp53 remained active in response to DNA damage. Quantitative transcriptional analyses of hp53 target genes demonstrated that unbound hp53 was absolutely required for activation of the DNA-damage response. Our results provide evidence of the mode by which the circadian tumor suppressor hPer2 modulates hp53 signaling in response to genotoxic stress. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4294682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42946822015-03-30 Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling Gotoh, Tetsuya Vila-Caballer, Marian Liu, Jingjing Schiffhauer, Samuel Finkielstein, Carla V. Mol Biol Cell Articles Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased hp53 stability by blocking Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and transcription of hp53 target genes. Because of the relevance of hp53 in checkpoint signaling, we hypothesize that hPer2 association with hp53 acts as a regulatory module that influences hp53's downstream response to genotoxic stress. Unlike the trimeric complex, whose distribution was confined to the nuclear compartment, hPer2/hp53 was identified in both cytosol and nucleus. At the transcriptional level, a reporter containing the hp21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter, a target of hp53, remained inactive in cells expressing a stable form of the hPer2/hp53 complex even when treated with γ-radiation. Finally, we established that hPer2 directly acts on the hp53 node, as checkpoint components upstream of hp53 remained active in response to DNA damage. Quantitative transcriptional analyses of hp53 target genes demonstrated that unbound hp53 was absolutely required for activation of the DNA-damage response. Our results provide evidence of the mode by which the circadian tumor suppressor hPer2 modulates hp53 signaling in response to genotoxic stress. The American Society for Cell Biology 2015-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4294682/ /pubmed/25411341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994 Text en © 2015 Gotoh, Vila-Caballer, et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Articles Gotoh, Tetsuya Vila-Caballer, Marian Liu, Jingjing Schiffhauer, Samuel Finkielstein, Carla V. Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling |
title | Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling |
title_full | Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling |
title_fullStr | Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling |
title_short | Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling |
title_sort | association of the circadian factor period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in dna-damage signaling |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotohtetsuya associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling AT vilacaballermarian associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling AT liujingjing associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling AT schiffhauersamuel associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling AT finkielsteincarlav associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling |