Cargando…

Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling

Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gotoh, Tetsuya, Vila-Caballer, Marian, Liu, Jingjing, Schiffhauer, Samuel, Finkielstein, Carla V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994
_version_ 1782352750828322816
author Gotoh, Tetsuya
Vila-Caballer, Marian
Liu, Jingjing
Schiffhauer, Samuel
Finkielstein, Carla V.
author_facet Gotoh, Tetsuya
Vila-Caballer, Marian
Liu, Jingjing
Schiffhauer, Samuel
Finkielstein, Carla V.
author_sort Gotoh, Tetsuya
collection PubMed
description Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased hp53 stability by blocking Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and transcription of hp53 target genes. Because of the relevance of hp53 in checkpoint signaling, we hypothesize that hPer2 association with hp53 acts as a regulatory module that influences hp53's downstream response to genotoxic stress. Unlike the trimeric complex, whose distribution was confined to the nuclear compartment, hPer2/hp53 was identified in both cytosol and nucleus. At the transcriptional level, a reporter containing the hp21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter, a target of hp53, remained inactive in cells expressing a stable form of the hPer2/hp53 complex even when treated with γ-radiation. Finally, we established that hPer2 directly acts on the hp53 node, as checkpoint components upstream of hp53 remained active in response to DNA damage. Quantitative transcriptional analyses of hp53 target genes demonstrated that unbound hp53 was absolutely required for activation of the DNA-damage response. Our results provide evidence of the mode by which the circadian tumor suppressor hPer2 modulates hp53 signaling in response to genotoxic stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4294682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42946822015-03-30 Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling Gotoh, Tetsuya Vila-Caballer, Marian Liu, Jingjing Schiffhauer, Samuel Finkielstein, Carla V. Mol Biol Cell Articles Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased hp53 stability by blocking Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and transcription of hp53 target genes. Because of the relevance of hp53 in checkpoint signaling, we hypothesize that hPer2 association with hp53 acts as a regulatory module that influences hp53's downstream response to genotoxic stress. Unlike the trimeric complex, whose distribution was confined to the nuclear compartment, hPer2/hp53 was identified in both cytosol and nucleus. At the transcriptional level, a reporter containing the hp21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter, a target of hp53, remained inactive in cells expressing a stable form of the hPer2/hp53 complex even when treated with γ-radiation. Finally, we established that hPer2 directly acts on the hp53 node, as checkpoint components upstream of hp53 remained active in response to DNA damage. Quantitative transcriptional analyses of hp53 target genes demonstrated that unbound hp53 was absolutely required for activation of the DNA-damage response. Our results provide evidence of the mode by which the circadian tumor suppressor hPer2 modulates hp53 signaling in response to genotoxic stress. The American Society for Cell Biology 2015-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4294682/ /pubmed/25411341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994 Text en © 2015 Gotoh, Vila-Caballer, et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Articles
Gotoh, Tetsuya
Vila-Caballer, Marian
Liu, Jingjing
Schiffhauer, Samuel
Finkielstein, Carla V.
Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
title Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
title_full Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
title_fullStr Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
title_full_unstemmed Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
title_short Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling
title_sort association of the circadian factor period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in dna-damage signaling
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994
work_keys_str_mv AT gotohtetsuya associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling
AT vilacaballermarian associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling
AT liujingjing associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling
AT schiffhauersamuel associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling
AT finkielsteincarlav associationofthecircadianfactorperiod2top53influencesp53sfunctionindnadamagesignaling