Cargando…

Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop

Consumption of carbohydrate-containing foods leads to transient postprandial rises in blood glucose concentrations that vary between food types. Higher postprandial glycaemic exposures have particularly been implicated in the development of chronic cardiometabolic diseases. Reducing such diet-relate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alssema, Marjan, Boers, Hanny M., Ceriello, Antonio, Kilpatrick, Eric S., Mela, David J., Priebe, Marion G., Schrauwen, Patrick, Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H., Pfeiffer, Andreas F. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25498786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514003547
_version_ 1782353788567289856
author Alssema, Marjan
Boers, Hanny M.
Ceriello, Antonio
Kilpatrick, Eric S.
Mela, David J.
Priebe, Marion G.
Schrauwen, Patrick
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H.
Pfeiffer, Andreas F. H.
author_facet Alssema, Marjan
Boers, Hanny M.
Ceriello, Antonio
Kilpatrick, Eric S.
Mela, David J.
Priebe, Marion G.
Schrauwen, Patrick
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H.
Pfeiffer, Andreas F. H.
author_sort Alssema, Marjan
collection PubMed
description Consumption of carbohydrate-containing foods leads to transient postprandial rises in blood glucose concentrations that vary between food types. Higher postprandial glycaemic exposures have particularly been implicated in the development of chronic cardiometabolic diseases. Reducing such diet-related exposures may be beneficial not only for diabetic patients but also for the general population. A variety of markers have been used to track different aspects of glycaemic exposures, with most of the relevant knowledge derived from diabetic patients. The assessment of glycaemic exposures among the non-diabetic population may require other, more sensitive markers. The present report summarises key messages of presentations and related discussions from a workshop organised by Unilever intended to consider currently applied markers of glycaemic exposure. The particular focus of the meeting was to identify the potential applicability of glycaemic exposure markers for studying dietary effects in the non-diabetic population. Workshop participants concluded that markers of glycaemic exposures are sparsely used in intervention studies among non-diabetic populations. Continuous glucose monitoring remains the optimal approach to directly assess glycaemic exposure. Markers of glycaemic exposure such as glycated Hb, fructosamine, glycated albumin, 1,5-anhydroglucitol and advanced glycation end products can be preferred dependent on the aspect of interest (period of exposure and glucose variability). For all the markers of glycaemia, the responsiveness to interventions will probably be smaller among the non-diabetic than among the diabetic population. Further validation and acceptance of existing glycaemic exposure markers applied among the non-diabetic population would aid food innovation and better design of dietary interventions targeting glycaemic exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43023872015-04-13 Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop Alssema, Marjan Boers, Hanny M. Ceriello, Antonio Kilpatrick, Eric S. Mela, David J. Priebe, Marion G. Schrauwen, Patrick Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. Pfeiffer, Andreas F. H. Br J Nutr Full Papers Consumption of carbohydrate-containing foods leads to transient postprandial rises in blood glucose concentrations that vary between food types. Higher postprandial glycaemic exposures have particularly been implicated in the development of chronic cardiometabolic diseases. Reducing such diet-related exposures may be beneficial not only for diabetic patients but also for the general population. A variety of markers have been used to track different aspects of glycaemic exposures, with most of the relevant knowledge derived from diabetic patients. The assessment of glycaemic exposures among the non-diabetic population may require other, more sensitive markers. The present report summarises key messages of presentations and related discussions from a workshop organised by Unilever intended to consider currently applied markers of glycaemic exposure. The particular focus of the meeting was to identify the potential applicability of glycaemic exposure markers for studying dietary effects in the non-diabetic population. Workshop participants concluded that markers of glycaemic exposures are sparsely used in intervention studies among non-diabetic populations. Continuous glucose monitoring remains the optimal approach to directly assess glycaemic exposure. Markers of glycaemic exposure such as glycated Hb, fructosamine, glycated albumin, 1,5-anhydroglucitol and advanced glycation end products can be preferred dependent on the aspect of interest (period of exposure and glucose variability). For all the markers of glycaemia, the responsiveness to interventions will probably be smaller among the non-diabetic than among the diabetic population. Further validation and acceptance of existing glycaemic exposure markers applied among the non-diabetic population would aid food innovation and better design of dietary interventions targeting glycaemic exposure. Cambridge University Press 2015-01-28 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4302387/ /pubmed/25498786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514003547 Text en © The Authors 2014 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Alssema, Marjan
Boers, Hanny M.
Ceriello, Antonio
Kilpatrick, Eric S.
Mela, David J.
Priebe, Marion G.
Schrauwen, Patrick
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H.
Pfeiffer, Andreas F. H.
Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop
title Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop
title_full Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop
title_fullStr Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop
title_full_unstemmed Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop
title_short Diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. A report of the Unilever Nutrition Workshop
title_sort diet and glycaemia: the markers and their meaning. a report of the unilever nutrition workshop
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25498786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514003547
work_keys_str_mv AT alssemamarjan dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT boershannym dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT cerielloantonio dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT kilpatrickerics dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT meladavidj dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT priebemariong dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT schrauwenpatrick dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT wolffenbuttelbruceh dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop
AT pfeifferandreasfh dietandglycaemiathemarkersandtheirmeaningareportoftheunilevernutritionworkshop