Cargando…

Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: Incorporating graduate students into undergraduate medical degree programs is a commonly accepted practice. However, it has only recently been recognized that these two types of students cope with their studies in various ways. The aim was to compare the learning approaches, stress level...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandover, Sally, Jonas-Dwyer, Diana, Marr, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0284-7
_version_ 1782354793657794560
author Sandover, Sally
Jonas-Dwyer, Diana
Marr, Timothy
author_facet Sandover, Sally
Jonas-Dwyer, Diana
Marr, Timothy
author_sort Sandover, Sally
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incorporating graduate students into undergraduate medical degree programs is a commonly accepted practice. However, it has only recently been recognized that these two types of students cope with their studies in various ways. The aim was to compare the learning approaches, stress levels and ways of coping of undergraduate (UG) and graduate entry medical students (GEMP) throughout their medical course. METHODS: From 2007–2011 each of the five year cohorts of undergraduate and GEMP students completed four components of the study. The components included demographics, The Biggs’ R-SPQ-2 F questionnaire which determines students’ approaches to learning, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) used to rate students perceived stress during the past four weeks, and the Ways of Coping (WOC) questionnaire used to assess students’ methods of coping with everyday problems. RESULTS: There was a consistent difference between UG and GEMP students approaches to learning over the five years. GEMP students preferred a deep approach while the UG students preferred a superficial approach to learning. This difference became more obvious in the clinical years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in stress levels. There were consistent differences in the ways the two groups coped with stress. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in approaches to learning and ways of coping with stress between the UG and the GEMP students. These need to be considered when introducing curriculum change, in particular, redesigning an UG program for post graduate delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43100382015-01-30 Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study Sandover, Sally Jonas-Dwyer, Diana Marr, Timothy BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Incorporating graduate students into undergraduate medical degree programs is a commonly accepted practice. However, it has only recently been recognized that these two types of students cope with their studies in various ways. The aim was to compare the learning approaches, stress levels and ways of coping of undergraduate (UG) and graduate entry medical students (GEMP) throughout their medical course. METHODS: From 2007–2011 each of the five year cohorts of undergraduate and GEMP students completed four components of the study. The components included demographics, The Biggs’ R-SPQ-2 F questionnaire which determines students’ approaches to learning, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) used to rate students perceived stress during the past four weeks, and the Ways of Coping (WOC) questionnaire used to assess students’ methods of coping with everyday problems. RESULTS: There was a consistent difference between UG and GEMP students approaches to learning over the five years. GEMP students preferred a deep approach while the UG students preferred a superficial approach to learning. This difference became more obvious in the clinical years. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in stress levels. There were consistent differences in the ways the two groups coped with stress. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in approaches to learning and ways of coping with stress between the UG and the GEMP students. These need to be considered when introducing curriculum change, in particular, redesigning an UG program for post graduate delivery. BioMed Central 2015-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4310038/ /pubmed/25616440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0284-7 Text en © Sandover et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sandover, Sally
Jonas-Dwyer, Diana
Marr, Timothy
Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
title Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
title_full Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
title_fullStr Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
title_short Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
title_sort graduate entry and undergraduate medical students’ study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0284-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sandoversally graduateentryandundergraduatemedicalstudentsstudyapproachesstresslevelsandwaysofcopingafiveyearlongitudinalstudy
AT jonasdwyerdiana graduateentryandundergraduatemedicalstudentsstudyapproachesstresslevelsandwaysofcopingafiveyearlongitudinalstudy
AT marrtimothy graduateentryandundergraduatemedicalstudentsstudyapproachesstresslevelsandwaysofcopingafiveyearlongitudinalstudy