Cargando…

Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions

BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of biological processes can substantially be supported by computational models in the form of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE). Typically, this model class contains many unknown parameters, which are estimated from inadequate and noisy data. Depe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flassig, Robert J, Migal, Iryna, der Zalm, Esther van, Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa, Sundmacher, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5
_version_ 1782354815975686144
author Flassig, Robert J
Migal, Iryna
der Zalm, Esther van
Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa
Sundmacher, Kai
author_facet Flassig, Robert J
Migal, Iryna
der Zalm, Esther van
Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa
Sundmacher, Kai
author_sort Flassig, Robert J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of biological processes can substantially be supported by computational models in the form of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE). Typically, this model class contains many unknown parameters, which are estimated from inadequate and noisy data. Depending on the ODE structure, predictions based on unmeasured states and associated parameters are highly uncertain, even undetermined. For given data, profile likelihood analysis has been proven to be one of the most practically relevant approaches for analyzing the identifiability of an ODE structure, and thus model predictions. In case of highly uncertain or non-identifiable parameters, rational experimental design based on various approaches has shown to significantly reduce parameter uncertainties with minimal amount of effort. RESULTS: In this work we illustrate how to use profile likelihood samples for quantifying the individual contribution of parameter uncertainty to prediction uncertainty. For the uncertainty quantification we introduce the profile likelihood sensitivity (PLS) index. Additionally, for the case of several uncertain parameters, we introduce the PLS entropy to quantify individual contributions to the overall prediction uncertainty. We show how to use these two criteria as an experimental design objective for selecting new, informative readouts in combination with intervention site identification. The characteristics of the proposed multi-criterion objective are illustrated with an in silico example. We further illustrate how an existing practically non-identifiable model for the chlorophyll fluorescence induction in a photosynthetic organism, D. salina, can be rendered identifiable by additional experiments with new readouts. CONCLUSIONS: Having data and profile likelihood samples at hand, the here proposed uncertainty quantification based on prediction samples from the profile likelihood provides a simple way for determining individual contributions of parameter uncertainties to uncertainties in model predictions. The uncertainty quantification of specific model predictions allows identifying regions, where model predictions have to be considered with care. Such uncertain regions can be used for a rational experimental design to render initially highly uncertain model predictions into certainty. Finally, our uncertainty quantification directly accounts for parameter interdependencies and parameter sensitivities of the specific prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43101452015-02-03 Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions Flassig, Robert J Migal, Iryna der Zalm, Esther van Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa Sundmacher, Kai BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of biological processes can substantially be supported by computational models in the form of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE). Typically, this model class contains many unknown parameters, which are estimated from inadequate and noisy data. Depending on the ODE structure, predictions based on unmeasured states and associated parameters are highly uncertain, even undetermined. For given data, profile likelihood analysis has been proven to be one of the most practically relevant approaches for analyzing the identifiability of an ODE structure, and thus model predictions. In case of highly uncertain or non-identifiable parameters, rational experimental design based on various approaches has shown to significantly reduce parameter uncertainties with minimal amount of effort. RESULTS: In this work we illustrate how to use profile likelihood samples for quantifying the individual contribution of parameter uncertainty to prediction uncertainty. For the uncertainty quantification we introduce the profile likelihood sensitivity (PLS) index. Additionally, for the case of several uncertain parameters, we introduce the PLS entropy to quantify individual contributions to the overall prediction uncertainty. We show how to use these two criteria as an experimental design objective for selecting new, informative readouts in combination with intervention site identification. The characteristics of the proposed multi-criterion objective are illustrated with an in silico example. We further illustrate how an existing practically non-identifiable model for the chlorophyll fluorescence induction in a photosynthetic organism, D. salina, can be rendered identifiable by additional experiments with new readouts. CONCLUSIONS: Having data and profile likelihood samples at hand, the here proposed uncertainty quantification based on prediction samples from the profile likelihood provides a simple way for determining individual contributions of parameter uncertainties to uncertainties in model predictions. The uncertainty quantification of specific model predictions allows identifying regions, where model predictions have to be considered with care. Such uncertain regions can be used for a rational experimental design to render initially highly uncertain model predictions into certainty. Finally, our uncertainty quantification directly accounts for parameter interdependencies and parameter sensitivities of the specific prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4310145/ /pubmed/25592474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5 Text en © Flassig et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Flassig, Robert J
Migal, Iryna
der Zalm, Esther van
Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa
Sundmacher, Kai
Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
title Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
title_full Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
title_fullStr Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
title_full_unstemmed Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
title_short Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
title_sort rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5
work_keys_str_mv AT flassigrobertj rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions
AT migaliryna rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions
AT derzalmesthervan rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions
AT rihkostruckmannliisa rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions
AT sundmacherkai rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions