Cargando…
Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions
BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of biological processes can substantially be supported by computational models in the form of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE). Typically, this model class contains many unknown parameters, which are estimated from inadequate and noisy data. Depe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5 |
_version_ | 1782354815975686144 |
---|---|
author | Flassig, Robert J Migal, Iryna der Zalm, Esther van Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa Sundmacher, Kai |
author_facet | Flassig, Robert J Migal, Iryna der Zalm, Esther van Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa Sundmacher, Kai |
author_sort | Flassig, Robert J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of biological processes can substantially be supported by computational models in the form of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE). Typically, this model class contains many unknown parameters, which are estimated from inadequate and noisy data. Depending on the ODE structure, predictions based on unmeasured states and associated parameters are highly uncertain, even undetermined. For given data, profile likelihood analysis has been proven to be one of the most practically relevant approaches for analyzing the identifiability of an ODE structure, and thus model predictions. In case of highly uncertain or non-identifiable parameters, rational experimental design based on various approaches has shown to significantly reduce parameter uncertainties with minimal amount of effort. RESULTS: In this work we illustrate how to use profile likelihood samples for quantifying the individual contribution of parameter uncertainty to prediction uncertainty. For the uncertainty quantification we introduce the profile likelihood sensitivity (PLS) index. Additionally, for the case of several uncertain parameters, we introduce the PLS entropy to quantify individual contributions to the overall prediction uncertainty. We show how to use these two criteria as an experimental design objective for selecting new, informative readouts in combination with intervention site identification. The characteristics of the proposed multi-criterion objective are illustrated with an in silico example. We further illustrate how an existing practically non-identifiable model for the chlorophyll fluorescence induction in a photosynthetic organism, D. salina, can be rendered identifiable by additional experiments with new readouts. CONCLUSIONS: Having data and profile likelihood samples at hand, the here proposed uncertainty quantification based on prediction samples from the profile likelihood provides a simple way for determining individual contributions of parameter uncertainties to uncertainties in model predictions. The uncertainty quantification of specific model predictions allows identifying regions, where model predictions have to be considered with care. Such uncertain regions can be used for a rational experimental design to render initially highly uncertain model predictions into certainty. Finally, our uncertainty quantification directly accounts for parameter interdependencies and parameter sensitivities of the specific prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4310145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43101452015-02-03 Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions Flassig, Robert J Migal, Iryna der Zalm, Esther van Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa Sundmacher, Kai BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of biological processes can substantially be supported by computational models in the form of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE). Typically, this model class contains many unknown parameters, which are estimated from inadequate and noisy data. Depending on the ODE structure, predictions based on unmeasured states and associated parameters are highly uncertain, even undetermined. For given data, profile likelihood analysis has been proven to be one of the most practically relevant approaches for analyzing the identifiability of an ODE structure, and thus model predictions. In case of highly uncertain or non-identifiable parameters, rational experimental design based on various approaches has shown to significantly reduce parameter uncertainties with minimal amount of effort. RESULTS: In this work we illustrate how to use profile likelihood samples for quantifying the individual contribution of parameter uncertainty to prediction uncertainty. For the uncertainty quantification we introduce the profile likelihood sensitivity (PLS) index. Additionally, for the case of several uncertain parameters, we introduce the PLS entropy to quantify individual contributions to the overall prediction uncertainty. We show how to use these two criteria as an experimental design objective for selecting new, informative readouts in combination with intervention site identification. The characteristics of the proposed multi-criterion objective are illustrated with an in silico example. We further illustrate how an existing practically non-identifiable model for the chlorophyll fluorescence induction in a photosynthetic organism, D. salina, can be rendered identifiable by additional experiments with new readouts. CONCLUSIONS: Having data and profile likelihood samples at hand, the here proposed uncertainty quantification based on prediction samples from the profile likelihood provides a simple way for determining individual contributions of parameter uncertainties to uncertainties in model predictions. The uncertainty quantification of specific model predictions allows identifying regions, where model predictions have to be considered with care. Such uncertain regions can be used for a rational experimental design to render initially highly uncertain model predictions into certainty. Finally, our uncertainty quantification directly accounts for parameter interdependencies and parameter sensitivities of the specific prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4310145/ /pubmed/25592474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5 Text en © Flassig et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Flassig, Robert J Migal, Iryna der Zalm, Esther van Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa Sundmacher, Kai Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
title | Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
title_full | Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
title_fullStr | Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
title_full_unstemmed | Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
title_short | Rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
title_sort | rational selection of experimental readout and intervention sites for reducing uncertainties in computational model predictions |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0436-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flassigrobertj rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions AT migaliryna rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions AT derzalmesthervan rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions AT rihkostruckmannliisa rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions AT sundmacherkai rationalselectionofexperimentalreadoutandinterventionsitesforreducinguncertaintiesincomputationalmodelpredictions |