Cargando…

Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data

Most next generation sequencing experiments generate more data than is usable for the experimental set up. For example, methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) affinity purification based sequencing is often used for DNA-methylation profiling, but up to 30% of the sequenced fragments cannot be mapped unique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mensaert, Klaas, Van Criekinge, Wim, Thas, Olivier, Schuuring, Ed, Steenbergen, Renske D.M., Wisman, G. Bea A., De Meyer, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00016
_version_ 1782355616479576064
author Mensaert, Klaas
Van Criekinge, Wim
Thas, Olivier
Schuuring, Ed
Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
Wisman, G. Bea A.
De Meyer, Tim
author_facet Mensaert, Klaas
Van Criekinge, Wim
Thas, Olivier
Schuuring, Ed
Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
Wisman, G. Bea A.
De Meyer, Tim
author_sort Mensaert, Klaas
collection PubMed
description Most next generation sequencing experiments generate more data than is usable for the experimental set up. For example, methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) affinity purification based sequencing is often used for DNA-methylation profiling, but up to 30% of the sequenced fragments cannot be mapped uniquely to the reference genome. Here we present and evaluate a methodology for the identification of viruses in these otherwise unused paired-end MBD-seq data. Viral detection is accomplished by mapping non-reference alignable reads to a comprehensive set of viral genomes. As viruses play an important role in epigenetics and cancer development, 92 (pre)malignant and benign samples, originating from two different collections of cervical samples and related cell lines, were used in this study. These samples include primary carcinomas (n = 22), low- and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1 and CIN2/3 - n = 2/n = 30) and normal tissue (n = 20), as well as control samples (n = 17). Viruses that were detected include phages, adenoviruses, herpesviridae and HPV. HPV, which causes virtually all cervical cancers, was identified in 95% of the carcinomas, 100% of the CIN2/3 samples, both CIN1 samples and in 55% of the normal samples. Comparing the amount of mapped fragments on HPV for each HPV-infected sample yielded a significant difference between normal samples and carcinomas or CIN2/3 samples (adjusted p-values resp. <10(−5), <10(−5)), reflecting different viral loads and/or methylation degrees in non-normal samples. Fragments originating from different HPV types could be distinguished and were independently validated by PCR-based assays in 71% of the detections. In conclusion, although limited by the a priori knowledge of viral reference genome sequences, the proposed methodology can provide a first confined but substantial insight into the presence, concentration and types of methylated viral sequences in MBD-seq data at low additional cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4316777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43167772015-02-19 Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data Mensaert, Klaas Van Criekinge, Wim Thas, Olivier Schuuring, Ed Steenbergen, Renske D.M. Wisman, G. Bea A. De Meyer, Tim Front Genet Genetics Most next generation sequencing experiments generate more data than is usable for the experimental set up. For example, methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) affinity purification based sequencing is often used for DNA-methylation profiling, but up to 30% of the sequenced fragments cannot be mapped uniquely to the reference genome. Here we present and evaluate a methodology for the identification of viruses in these otherwise unused paired-end MBD-seq data. Viral detection is accomplished by mapping non-reference alignable reads to a comprehensive set of viral genomes. As viruses play an important role in epigenetics and cancer development, 92 (pre)malignant and benign samples, originating from two different collections of cervical samples and related cell lines, were used in this study. These samples include primary carcinomas (n = 22), low- and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1 and CIN2/3 - n = 2/n = 30) and normal tissue (n = 20), as well as control samples (n = 17). Viruses that were detected include phages, adenoviruses, herpesviridae and HPV. HPV, which causes virtually all cervical cancers, was identified in 95% of the carcinomas, 100% of the CIN2/3 samples, both CIN1 samples and in 55% of the normal samples. Comparing the amount of mapped fragments on HPV for each HPV-infected sample yielded a significant difference between normal samples and carcinomas or CIN2/3 samples (adjusted p-values resp. <10(−5), <10(−5)), reflecting different viral loads and/or methylation degrees in non-normal samples. Fragments originating from different HPV types could be distinguished and were independently validated by PCR-based assays in 71% of the detections. In conclusion, although limited by the a priori knowledge of viral reference genome sequences, the proposed methodology can provide a first confined but substantial insight into the presence, concentration and types of methylated viral sequences in MBD-seq data at low additional cost. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4316777/ /pubmed/25699076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00016 Text en Copyright © 2015 Mensaert, Van Criekinge, Thas, Schuuring, Steenbergen, Wisman and De Meyer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Mensaert, Klaas
Van Criekinge, Wim
Thas, Olivier
Schuuring, Ed
Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
Wisman, G. Bea A.
De Meyer, Tim
Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
title Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
title_full Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
title_fullStr Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
title_full_unstemmed Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
title_short Mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
title_sort mining for viral fragments in methylation enriched sequencing data
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4316777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00016
work_keys_str_mv AT mensaertklaas miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata
AT vancriekingewim miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata
AT thasolivier miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata
AT schuuringed miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata
AT steenbergenrenskedm miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata
AT wismangbeaa miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata
AT demeyertim miningforviralfragmentsinmethylationenrichedsequencingdata