Cargando…

Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation

Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuso, Andrea, Ferraguti, Giampiero, Scarpa, Sigfrido, Ferrer, Isidre, Lucarelli, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25692551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118318
_version_ 1782357996858245120
author Fuso, Andrea
Ferraguti, Giampiero
Scarpa, Sigfrido
Ferrer, Isidre
Lucarelli, Marco
author_facet Fuso, Andrea
Ferraguti, Giampiero
Scarpa, Sigfrido
Ferrer, Isidre
Lucarelli, Marco
author_sort Fuso, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of primers to study different experimental models and methylation statuses. We demonstrated that MethPrimers negatively select hypermethylated DNA sequences in the PCR step of the bisulfite assay, resulting in CpG methylation underestimation and non-CpG methylation masking, failing to evidence differential methylation statuses. We also describe the characteristics of “Methylation-Insensitive Primers” (MIPs), having degenerated bases (G/A) to cope with the uncertain C/U conversion. As CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation patterns are largely variable depending on the species, developmental stage, tissue and cell type, a variable extent of the bias is expected. The more the methylome is methylated, the greater is the extent of the bias, with a prevalent effect of non-CpG methylation. These findings suggest a revision of several DNA methylation patterns so far documented and also point out the necessity of applying unbiased analyses to the increasing number of epigenomic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4333220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43332202015-02-24 Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation Fuso, Andrea Ferraguti, Giampiero Scarpa, Sigfrido Ferrer, Isidre Lucarelli, Marco PLoS One Research Article Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of primers to study different experimental models and methylation statuses. We demonstrated that MethPrimers negatively select hypermethylated DNA sequences in the PCR step of the bisulfite assay, resulting in CpG methylation underestimation and non-CpG methylation masking, failing to evidence differential methylation statuses. We also describe the characteristics of “Methylation-Insensitive Primers” (MIPs), having degenerated bases (G/A) to cope with the uncertain C/U conversion. As CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation patterns are largely variable depending on the species, developmental stage, tissue and cell type, a variable extent of the bias is expected. The more the methylome is methylated, the greater is the extent of the bias, with a prevalent effect of non-CpG methylation. These findings suggest a revision of several DNA methylation patterns so far documented and also point out the necessity of applying unbiased analyses to the increasing number of epigenomic studies. Public Library of Science 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4333220/ /pubmed/25692551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118318 Text en © 2015 Fuso et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fuso, Andrea
Ferraguti, Giampiero
Scarpa, Sigfrido
Ferrer, Isidre
Lucarelli, Marco
Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
title Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
title_full Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
title_fullStr Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
title_full_unstemmed Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
title_short Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
title_sort disclosing bias in bisulfite assay: methprimers underestimate high dna methylation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25692551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118318
work_keys_str_mv AT fusoandrea disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation
AT ferragutigiampiero disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation
AT scarpasigfrido disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation
AT ferrerisidre disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation
AT lucarellimarco disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation