Cargando…
Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation
Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25692551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118318 |
_version_ | 1782357996858245120 |
---|---|
author | Fuso, Andrea Ferraguti, Giampiero Scarpa, Sigfrido Ferrer, Isidre Lucarelli, Marco |
author_facet | Fuso, Andrea Ferraguti, Giampiero Scarpa, Sigfrido Ferrer, Isidre Lucarelli, Marco |
author_sort | Fuso, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of primers to study different experimental models and methylation statuses. We demonstrated that MethPrimers negatively select hypermethylated DNA sequences in the PCR step of the bisulfite assay, resulting in CpG methylation underestimation and non-CpG methylation masking, failing to evidence differential methylation statuses. We also describe the characteristics of “Methylation-Insensitive Primers” (MIPs), having degenerated bases (G/A) to cope with the uncertain C/U conversion. As CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation patterns are largely variable depending on the species, developmental stage, tissue and cell type, a variable extent of the bias is expected. The more the methylome is methylated, the greater is the extent of the bias, with a prevalent effect of non-CpG methylation. These findings suggest a revision of several DNA methylation patterns so far documented and also point out the necessity of applying unbiased analyses to the increasing number of epigenomic studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4333220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43332202015-02-24 Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation Fuso, Andrea Ferraguti, Giampiero Scarpa, Sigfrido Ferrer, Isidre Lucarelli, Marco PLoS One Research Article Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of primers to study different experimental models and methylation statuses. We demonstrated that MethPrimers negatively select hypermethylated DNA sequences in the PCR step of the bisulfite assay, resulting in CpG methylation underestimation and non-CpG methylation masking, failing to evidence differential methylation statuses. We also describe the characteristics of “Methylation-Insensitive Primers” (MIPs), having degenerated bases (G/A) to cope with the uncertain C/U conversion. As CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation patterns are largely variable depending on the species, developmental stage, tissue and cell type, a variable extent of the bias is expected. The more the methylome is methylated, the greater is the extent of the bias, with a prevalent effect of non-CpG methylation. These findings suggest a revision of several DNA methylation patterns so far documented and also point out the necessity of applying unbiased analyses to the increasing number of epigenomic studies. Public Library of Science 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4333220/ /pubmed/25692551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118318 Text en © 2015 Fuso et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fuso, Andrea Ferraguti, Giampiero Scarpa, Sigfrido Ferrer, Isidre Lucarelli, Marco Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation |
title | Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation |
title_full | Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation |
title_fullStr | Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation |
title_full_unstemmed | Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation |
title_short | Disclosing Bias in Bisulfite Assay: MethPrimers Underestimate High DNA Methylation |
title_sort | disclosing bias in bisulfite assay: methprimers underestimate high dna methylation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4333220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25692551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fusoandrea disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation AT ferragutigiampiero disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation AT scarpasigfrido disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation AT ferrerisidre disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation AT lucarellimarco disclosingbiasinbisulfiteassaymethprimersunderestimatehighdnamethylation |