Cargando…
Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families
BACKGROUND: An important problem in computational biology is the automatic detection of protein families (groups of homologous sequences). Clustering sequences into families is at the heart of most comparative studies dealing with protein evolution, structure, and function. Many methods have been de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25651949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0445-4 |
_version_ | 1782358898125045760 |
---|---|
author | Bernardes, Juliana S Vieira, Fabio RJ Costa, Lygia MM Zaverucha, Gerson |
author_facet | Bernardes, Juliana S Vieira, Fabio RJ Costa, Lygia MM Zaverucha, Gerson |
author_sort | Bernardes, Juliana S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An important problem in computational biology is the automatic detection of protein families (groups of homologous sequences). Clustering sequences into families is at the heart of most comparative studies dealing with protein evolution, structure, and function. Many methods have been developed for this task, and they perform reasonably well (over 0.88 of F-measure) when grouping proteins with high sequence identity. However, for highly diverged proteins the performance of these methods can be much lower, mainly because a common evolutionary origin is not deduced directly from sequence similarity. To the best of our knowledge, a systematic evaluation of clustering methods over distant homologous proteins is still lacking. RESULTS: We performed a comparative assessment of four clustering algorithms: Markov Clustering (MCL), Transitive Clustering (TransClust), Spectral Clustering of Protein Sequences (SCPS), and High-Fidelity clustering of protein sequences (HiFix), considering several datasets with different levels of sequence similarity. Two types of similarity measures, required by the clustering sequence methods, were used to evaluate the performance of the algorithms: the standard measure obtained from sequence–sequence comparisons, and a novel measure based on profile-profile comparisons, used here for the first time. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal low clustering performance for the highly divergent datasets when the standard measure was used. However, the novel measure based on profile-profile comparisons substantially improved the performance of the four methods, especially when very low sequence identity datasets were evaluated. We also performed a parameter optimization step to determine the best configuration for each clustering method. We found that TransClust clearly outperformed the other methods for most datasets. This work also provides guidelines for the practical application of clustering sequence methods aimed at detecting accurately groups of related protein sequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4339679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43396792015-02-26 Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families Bernardes, Juliana S Vieira, Fabio RJ Costa, Lygia MM Zaverucha, Gerson BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: An important problem in computational biology is the automatic detection of protein families (groups of homologous sequences). Clustering sequences into families is at the heart of most comparative studies dealing with protein evolution, structure, and function. Many methods have been developed for this task, and they perform reasonably well (over 0.88 of F-measure) when grouping proteins with high sequence identity. However, for highly diverged proteins the performance of these methods can be much lower, mainly because a common evolutionary origin is not deduced directly from sequence similarity. To the best of our knowledge, a systematic evaluation of clustering methods over distant homologous proteins is still lacking. RESULTS: We performed a comparative assessment of four clustering algorithms: Markov Clustering (MCL), Transitive Clustering (TransClust), Spectral Clustering of Protein Sequences (SCPS), and High-Fidelity clustering of protein sequences (HiFix), considering several datasets with different levels of sequence similarity. Two types of similarity measures, required by the clustering sequence methods, were used to evaluate the performance of the algorithms: the standard measure obtained from sequence–sequence comparisons, and a novel measure based on profile-profile comparisons, used here for the first time. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal low clustering performance for the highly divergent datasets when the standard measure was used. However, the novel measure based on profile-profile comparisons substantially improved the performance of the four methods, especially when very low sequence identity datasets were evaluated. We also performed a parameter optimization step to determine the best configuration for each clustering method. We found that TransClust clearly outperformed the other methods for most datasets. This work also provides guidelines for the practical application of clustering sequence methods aimed at detecting accurately groups of related protein sequences. BioMed Central 2015-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4339679/ /pubmed/25651949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0445-4 Text en © Bernardes et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bernardes, Juliana S Vieira, Fabio RJ Costa, Lygia MM Zaverucha, Gerson Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
title | Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
title_full | Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
title_short | Evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
title_sort | evaluation and improvements of clustering algorithms for detecting remote homologous protein families |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25651949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0445-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernardesjulianas evaluationandimprovementsofclusteringalgorithmsfordetectingremotehomologousproteinfamilies AT vieirafabiorj evaluationandimprovementsofclusteringalgorithmsfordetectingremotehomologousproteinfamilies AT costalygiamm evaluationandimprovementsofclusteringalgorithmsfordetectingremotehomologousproteinfamilies AT zaveruchagerson evaluationandimprovementsofclusteringalgorithmsfordetectingremotehomologousproteinfamilies |