Cargando…

How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?

Current bottom-up quantitative proteomics methods based on MS/MS sequencing of peptides are shown to be strongly dependent on sample preparation. Using cytosolic proteins from MCF-7 breast cancer cells, it is shown that protein pre-fractionation based on pI and MW is more effective than pre-fraction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulvey, Claire, Thur, Bettina, Crawford, Mark, Godovac-Zimmermann, Jasminka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729266
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PRI.S5882
_version_ 1782359035306049536
author Mulvey, Claire
Thur, Bettina
Crawford, Mark
Godovac-Zimmermann, Jasminka
author_facet Mulvey, Claire
Thur, Bettina
Crawford, Mark
Godovac-Zimmermann, Jasminka
author_sort Mulvey, Claire
collection PubMed
description Current bottom-up quantitative proteomics methods based on MS/MS sequencing of peptides are shown to be strongly dependent on sample preparation. Using cytosolic proteins from MCF-7 breast cancer cells, it is shown that protein pre-fractionation based on pI and MW is more effective than pre-fractionation using only MW in increasing the number of observed proteins (947 vs. 704 proteins) and the number of spectral counts per protein. Combination of MS data from the different pre-fractionation methods results in further improvements (1238 proteins). We discuss that at present the main limitation on quantitation by MS/MS sequencing is not MS sensitivity and protein abundance, but rather extensive peptide overlap and limited MS/MS sequencing throughput, and that this favors internally calibrated methods such as SILAC, ICAT or ITRAQ over spectral counting methods in attempts to drastically improve proteome coverage of biological samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4340538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43405382015-02-25 How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods? Mulvey, Claire Thur, Bettina Crawford, Mark Godovac-Zimmermann, Jasminka Proteomics Insights Article Current bottom-up quantitative proteomics methods based on MS/MS sequencing of peptides are shown to be strongly dependent on sample preparation. Using cytosolic proteins from MCF-7 breast cancer cells, it is shown that protein pre-fractionation based on pI and MW is more effective than pre-fractionation using only MW in increasing the number of observed proteins (947 vs. 704 proteins) and the number of spectral counts per protein. Combination of MS data from the different pre-fractionation methods results in further improvements (1238 proteins). We discuss that at present the main limitation on quantitation by MS/MS sequencing is not MS sensitivity and protein abundance, but rather extensive peptide overlap and limited MS/MS sequencing throughput, and that this favors internally calibrated methods such as SILAC, ICAT or ITRAQ over spectral counting methods in attempts to drastically improve proteome coverage of biological samples. 2010-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4340538/ /pubmed/25729266 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PRI.S5882 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mulvey, Claire
Thur, Bettina
Crawford, Mark
Godovac-Zimmermann, Jasminka
How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?
title How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?
title_full How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?
title_fullStr How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?
title_full_unstemmed How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?
title_short How Many proteins are Missed in Quantitative proteomics Based on Ms/Ms sequencing Methods?
title_sort how many proteins are missed in quantitative proteomics based on ms/ms sequencing methods?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729266
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/PRI.S5882
work_keys_str_mv AT mulveyclaire howmanyproteinsaremissedinquantitativeproteomicsbasedonmsmssequencingmethods
AT thurbettina howmanyproteinsaremissedinquantitativeproteomicsbasedonmsmssequencingmethods
AT crawfordmark howmanyproteinsaremissedinquantitativeproteomicsbasedonmsmssequencingmethods
AT godovaczimmermannjasminka howmanyproteinsaremissedinquantitativeproteomicsbasedonmsmssequencingmethods