Comparison of semi-automated methods to quantify infarct size and area at risk by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths

BACKGROUND: There is currently no gold standard technique for quantifying infarct size (IS) and ischaemic area-at-risk (AAR [oedema]) on late gadolinium enhancement imaging (LGE) and T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery imaging (T2w-STIR) respectively. This study aimed to compare the accuracy an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Jamal N, Nazir, Sheraz A, Horsfield, Mark A, Singh, Anvesha, Kanagala, Prathap, Greenwood, John P, Gershlick, Anthony H, McCann, Gerry P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1007-1

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1007-1

Ejemplares similares