Cargando…
Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula keeping children never-smokers. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis. Data: MEDLINE (1966+), EMBASE (1974+), Cinahl, PsycINFO (1967+), ERIC (1982+), Cochrane CENTRAL, Health Star, Dissertation Abstracts, conference p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25757946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006976 |
_version_ | 1782361593978290176 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Roger E McLellan, Julie Perera, Rafael |
author_facet | Thomas, Roger E McLellan, Julie Perera, Rafael |
author_sort | Thomas, Roger E |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula keeping children never-smokers. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis. Data: MEDLINE (1966+), EMBASE (1974+), Cinahl, PsycINFO (1967+), ERIC (1982+), Cochrane CENTRAL, Health Star, Dissertation Abstracts, conference proceedings. Data synthesis: pooled analyses, fixed-effects models, adjusted ORs. Risk of bias assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. SETTING: 50 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based smoking curricula. PARTICIPANTS: Never-smokers age 5–18 (n=143 495); follow-up ≥6 months; all countries; no date/language limitations. INTERVENTIONS: Information, social influences, social competence, combined social influences/competence and multimodal curricula. OUTCOME MEASURE: Remaining a never-smoker at follow-up. RESULTS: Pooling all curricula, trials with follow-up ≤1 year showed no statistically significant differences compared with controls (OR 0.91 (0.82 to 1.01)), though trials of combined social competence/social influences curricula had a significant effect on smoking prevention (7 trials, OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.85)). Pooling all trials with longest follow-up showed an overall significant effect in favour of the interventions (OR 0.88 (0.82 to 0.95)), as did the social competence (OR 0.65 (0.43 to 0.96)) and combined social competence/social influences curricula (OR 0.60 (0.43 to 0.83)). No effect for information, social influences or multimodal curricula. Principal findings were not sensitive to inclusion of booster sessions in curricula or to whether they were peer-led or adult-led. Differentiation into tobacco-only or multifocal curricula had a similar effect on the primary findings. Few trials assessed outcomes by gender: there were significant effects for females at both follow-up periods, but not for males. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs of baseline never-smokers at longest follow-up found an overall significant effect with average 12% reduction in starting smoking compared with controls, but no effect for all trials pooled at ≤1 year. However, combined social competence/social influences curricula showed a significant effect at both follow-up periods. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Cochrane Tobacco Review Group CD001293. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4360839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43608392015-03-25 Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis Thomas, Roger E McLellan, Julie Perera, Rafael BMJ Open Addiction OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula keeping children never-smokers. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis. Data: MEDLINE (1966+), EMBASE (1974+), Cinahl, PsycINFO (1967+), ERIC (1982+), Cochrane CENTRAL, Health Star, Dissertation Abstracts, conference proceedings. Data synthesis: pooled analyses, fixed-effects models, adjusted ORs. Risk of bias assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. SETTING: 50 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based smoking curricula. PARTICIPANTS: Never-smokers age 5–18 (n=143 495); follow-up ≥6 months; all countries; no date/language limitations. INTERVENTIONS: Information, social influences, social competence, combined social influences/competence and multimodal curricula. OUTCOME MEASURE: Remaining a never-smoker at follow-up. RESULTS: Pooling all curricula, trials with follow-up ≤1 year showed no statistically significant differences compared with controls (OR 0.91 (0.82 to 1.01)), though trials of combined social competence/social influences curricula had a significant effect on smoking prevention (7 trials, OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.85)). Pooling all trials with longest follow-up showed an overall significant effect in favour of the interventions (OR 0.88 (0.82 to 0.95)), as did the social competence (OR 0.65 (0.43 to 0.96)) and combined social competence/social influences curricula (OR 0.60 (0.43 to 0.83)). No effect for information, social influences or multimodal curricula. Principal findings were not sensitive to inclusion of booster sessions in curricula or to whether they were peer-led or adult-led. Differentiation into tobacco-only or multifocal curricula had a similar effect on the primary findings. Few trials assessed outcomes by gender: there were significant effects for females at both follow-up periods, but not for males. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs of baseline never-smokers at longest follow-up found an overall significant effect with average 12% reduction in starting smoking compared with controls, but no effect for all trials pooled at ≤1 year. However, combined social competence/social influences curricula showed a significant effect at both follow-up periods. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Cochrane Tobacco Review Group CD001293. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4360839/ /pubmed/25757946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006976 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Addiction Thomas, Roger E McLellan, Julie Perera, Rafael Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Addiction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25757946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasrogere effectivenessofschoolbasedsmokingpreventioncurriculasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mclellanjulie effectivenessofschoolbasedsmokingpreventioncurriculasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pererarafael effectivenessofschoolbasedsmokingpreventioncurriculasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |