Cargando…

Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision

The aims of the present study were to compare the effects of 1) training at 90 and 100% sprint velocity and 2) supervised versus unsupervised sprint training on soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players. Young, male soccer players (17 ±1 yr, 71 ±10 kg, 180 ±6 cm) were randomly as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haugen, Thomas, Tønnessen, Espen, Øksenholt, Øyvind, Haugen, Fredrik Lie, Paulsen, Gøran, Enoksen, Eystein, Seiler, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121827
_version_ 1782362878008885248
author Haugen, Thomas
Tønnessen, Espen
Øksenholt, Øyvind
Haugen, Fredrik Lie
Paulsen, Gøran
Enoksen, Eystein
Seiler, Stephen
author_facet Haugen, Thomas
Tønnessen, Espen
Øksenholt, Øyvind
Haugen, Fredrik Lie
Paulsen, Gøran
Enoksen, Eystein
Seiler, Stephen
author_sort Haugen, Thomas
collection PubMed
description The aims of the present study were to compare the effects of 1) training at 90 and 100% sprint velocity and 2) supervised versus unsupervised sprint training on soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players. Young, male soccer players (17 ±1 yr, 71 ±10 kg, 180 ±6 cm) were randomly assigned to four different treatment conditions over a 7-week intervention period. A control group (CON, n=9) completed regular soccer training according to their teams’ original training plans. Three training groups performed a weekly repeated-sprint training session in addition to their regular soccer training sessions performed at A) 100% intensity without supervision (100UNSUP, n=13), B) 90% of maximal sprint velocity with supervision (90SUP, n=10) or C) 90% of maximal sprint velocity without supervision (90UNSUP, n=13). Repetitions x distance for the sprint-training sessions were 15x20 m for 100UNSUP and 30x20 m for 90SUP and 90UNSUP. Single-sprint performance (best time from 15x20 m sprints), repeated-sprint performance (mean time over 15x20 m sprints), countermovement jump and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) were assessed during pre-training and post-training tests. No significant differences in performance outcomes were observed across groups. 90SUP improved Yo-Yo IR1 by a moderate margin compared to controls, while all other effect magnitudes were trivial or small. In conclusion, neither weekly sprint training at 90 or 100% velocity, nor supervised sprint training enhanced soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4370475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43704752015-04-04 Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision Haugen, Thomas Tønnessen, Espen Øksenholt, Øyvind Haugen, Fredrik Lie Paulsen, Gøran Enoksen, Eystein Seiler, Stephen PLoS One Research Article The aims of the present study were to compare the effects of 1) training at 90 and 100% sprint velocity and 2) supervised versus unsupervised sprint training on soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players. Young, male soccer players (17 ±1 yr, 71 ±10 kg, 180 ±6 cm) were randomly assigned to four different treatment conditions over a 7-week intervention period. A control group (CON, n=9) completed regular soccer training according to their teams’ original training plans. Three training groups performed a weekly repeated-sprint training session in addition to their regular soccer training sessions performed at A) 100% intensity without supervision (100UNSUP, n=13), B) 90% of maximal sprint velocity with supervision (90SUP, n=10) or C) 90% of maximal sprint velocity without supervision (90UNSUP, n=13). Repetitions x distance for the sprint-training sessions were 15x20 m for 100UNSUP and 30x20 m for 90SUP and 90UNSUP. Single-sprint performance (best time from 15x20 m sprints), repeated-sprint performance (mean time over 15x20 m sprints), countermovement jump and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) were assessed during pre-training and post-training tests. No significant differences in performance outcomes were observed across groups. 90SUP improved Yo-Yo IR1 by a moderate margin compared to controls, while all other effect magnitudes were trivial or small. In conclusion, neither weekly sprint training at 90 or 100% velocity, nor supervised sprint training enhanced soccer-specific physical performance in junior soccer players. Public Library of Science 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4370475/ /pubmed/25798601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121827 Text en © 2015 Haugen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haugen, Thomas
Tønnessen, Espen
Øksenholt, Øyvind
Haugen, Fredrik Lie
Paulsen, Gøran
Enoksen, Eystein
Seiler, Stephen
Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision
title Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision
title_full Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision
title_fullStr Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision
title_full_unstemmed Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision
title_short Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision
title_sort sprint conditioning of junior soccer players: effects of training intensity and technique supervision
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121827
work_keys_str_mv AT haugenthomas sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision
AT tønnessenespen sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision
AT øksenholtøyvind sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision
AT haugenfredriklie sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision
AT paulsengøran sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision
AT enokseneystein sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision
AT seilerstephen sprintconditioningofjuniorsoccerplayerseffectsoftrainingintensityandtechniquesupervision