Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why

Bayesian reasoning, defined here as the updating of a posterior probability following new information, has historically been problematic for humans. Classic psychology experiments have tested human Bayesian reasoning through the use of word problems and have evaluated each participant’s performance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brase, Gary L., Hill, W. Trey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Psychology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00340

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4379735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00340

Ejemplares similares