Cargando…

The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males

Background/Aim. Exercise designed to condition the lumbar extensor musculature is often included in resistance training (RT) programs. It is suggested that deconditioning of this musculature may be linked to low back pain. Thus effective means of conditioning these muscles are of interest to pursue....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steele, James, Fitzpatrick, Adam, Bruce-Low, Stewart, Fisher, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861560
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.878
_version_ 1782365525144240128
author Steele, James
Fitzpatrick, Adam
Bruce-Low, Stewart
Fisher, James
author_facet Steele, James
Fitzpatrick, Adam
Bruce-Low, Stewart
Fisher, James
author_sort Steele, James
collection PubMed
description Background/Aim. Exercise designed to condition the lumbar extensor musculature is often included in resistance training (RT) programs. It is suggested that deconditioning of this musculature may be linked to low back pain. Thus effective means of conditioning these muscles are of interest to pursue. Evidence suggests that isolated lumbar extension (ILEX) RT might be most efficacious, however, the best means of manipulating resistance training variables in this regard is unknown. Set volume is an easily manipulated RT variable and one thought to also interact with training status. As such this study sought to examine the effect of set volume during ILEX RT in trained males. Methods. Trained males previously engaged in exercises designed to condition the lumbar extensors underwent a 6 week intervention and were randomised to either a single set (1ST, n = 9), multiple set (3ST, n = 8) or control group (CON, n = 9). Pre- and post-testing of ILEX strength was conducted. Results. Both 1ST and 3ST significantly increased ILEX strength (p < 0.05) with large effect sizes (d = 0.89 and 0.95 respectively) whereas the CON group produced significant losses (−8.9%) with a moderate effect size (d = − 0.53). There was no statistically significant difference in ILEX strength gains when 1ST and 3ST were directly compared (p = 0.336). Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that significant ILEX strength changes occur in trained males as a result of 6 weeks of ILEX RT and that these changes are unaffected by set volume.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4389271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43892712015-04-08 The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males Steele, James Fitzpatrick, Adam Bruce-Low, Stewart Fisher, James PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology Background/Aim. Exercise designed to condition the lumbar extensor musculature is often included in resistance training (RT) programs. It is suggested that deconditioning of this musculature may be linked to low back pain. Thus effective means of conditioning these muscles are of interest to pursue. Evidence suggests that isolated lumbar extension (ILEX) RT might be most efficacious, however, the best means of manipulating resistance training variables in this regard is unknown. Set volume is an easily manipulated RT variable and one thought to also interact with training status. As such this study sought to examine the effect of set volume during ILEX RT in trained males. Methods. Trained males previously engaged in exercises designed to condition the lumbar extensors underwent a 6 week intervention and were randomised to either a single set (1ST, n = 9), multiple set (3ST, n = 8) or control group (CON, n = 9). Pre- and post-testing of ILEX strength was conducted. Results. Both 1ST and 3ST significantly increased ILEX strength (p < 0.05) with large effect sizes (d = 0.89 and 0.95 respectively) whereas the CON group produced significant losses (−8.9%) with a moderate effect size (d = − 0.53). There was no statistically significant difference in ILEX strength gains when 1ST and 3ST were directly compared (p = 0.336). Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that significant ILEX strength changes occur in trained males as a result of 6 weeks of ILEX RT and that these changes are unaffected by set volume. PeerJ Inc. 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4389271/ /pubmed/25861560 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.878 Text en © 2015 Steele et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Steele, James
Fitzpatrick, Adam
Bruce-Low, Stewart
Fisher, James
The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
title The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
title_full The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
title_fullStr The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
title_full_unstemmed The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
title_short The effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
title_sort effects of set volume during isolated lumbar extension resistance training in recreationally trained males
topic Anatomy and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25861560
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.878
work_keys_str_mv AT steelejames theeffectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT fitzpatrickadam theeffectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT brucelowstewart theeffectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT fisherjames theeffectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT steelejames effectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT fitzpatrickadam effectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT brucelowstewart effectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales
AT fisherjames effectsofsetvolumeduringisolatedlumbarextensionresistancetraininginrecreationallytrainedmales