Cargando…
A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes ischaemic brain injury. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) is a major determinant of cerebral blood flow. Thus, mild hypercapnia in the 24 h following cardiac arrest may increase cerebral blood flow and attenuate such injury. We describe the Carbon Control an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0676-3 |
_version_ | 1782366220810452992 |
---|---|
author | Eastwood, Glenn M Schneider, Antoine G Suzuki, Satoshi Bailey, Michael Bellomo, Rinaldo |
author_facet | Eastwood, Glenn M Schneider, Antoine G Suzuki, Satoshi Bailey, Michael Bellomo, Rinaldo |
author_sort | Eastwood, Glenn M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes ischaemic brain injury. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) is a major determinant of cerebral blood flow. Thus, mild hypercapnia in the 24 h following cardiac arrest may increase cerebral blood flow and attenuate such injury. We describe the Carbon Control and Cardiac Arrest (CCC) trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The CCC trial is a pilot multicentre feasibility, safety and biological efficacy randomized controlled trial recruiting adult cardiac arrest patients admitted to the intensive care unit after return of spontaneous circulation. At admission, using concealed allocation, participants are randomized to 24 h of either normocapnia (PaCO(2) 35 to 45 mmHg) or mild hypercapnia (PaCO(2) 50 to 55 mmHg). Key feasibility outcomes are recruitment rate and protocol compliance rate. The primary biological efficacy and biological safety measures are the between-groups difference in serum neuron-specific enolase and S100b protein levels at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Secondary outcome measure include adverse events, in-hospital mortality, and neurological assessment at 6 months. DISCUSSION: The trial commenced in December 2012 and, when completed, will provide clinical evidence as to whether targeting mild hypercapnia for 24 h following intensive care unit admission for cardiac arrest patients is feasible and safe and whether it results in decreased concentrations of neurological injury biomarkers compared with normocapnia. Trial results will also be used to determine whether a phase IIb study powered for survival at 90 days is feasible and justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000690853. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4393877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43938772015-04-13 A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Eastwood, Glenn M Schneider, Antoine G Suzuki, Satoshi Bailey, Michael Bellomo, Rinaldo Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes ischaemic brain injury. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) is a major determinant of cerebral blood flow. Thus, mild hypercapnia in the 24 h following cardiac arrest may increase cerebral blood flow and attenuate such injury. We describe the Carbon Control and Cardiac Arrest (CCC) trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The CCC trial is a pilot multicentre feasibility, safety and biological efficacy randomized controlled trial recruiting adult cardiac arrest patients admitted to the intensive care unit after return of spontaneous circulation. At admission, using concealed allocation, participants are randomized to 24 h of either normocapnia (PaCO(2) 35 to 45 mmHg) or mild hypercapnia (PaCO(2) 50 to 55 mmHg). Key feasibility outcomes are recruitment rate and protocol compliance rate. The primary biological efficacy and biological safety measures are the between-groups difference in serum neuron-specific enolase and S100b protein levels at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Secondary outcome measure include adverse events, in-hospital mortality, and neurological assessment at 6 months. DISCUSSION: The trial commenced in December 2012 and, when completed, will provide clinical evidence as to whether targeting mild hypercapnia for 24 h following intensive care unit admission for cardiac arrest patients is feasible and safe and whether it results in decreased concentrations of neurological injury biomarkers compared with normocapnia. Trial results will also be used to determine whether a phase IIb study powered for survival at 90 days is feasible and justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000690853. BioMed Central 2015-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4393877/ /pubmed/25872502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0676-3 Text en © Eastwood et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Eastwood, Glenn M Schneider, Antoine G Suzuki, Satoshi Bailey, Michael Bellomo, Rinaldo A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0676-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eastwoodglennm apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schneiderantoineg apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suzukisatoshi apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baileymichael apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bellomorinaldo apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT eastwoodglennm pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schneiderantoineg pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suzukisatoshi pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baileymichael pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bellomorinaldo pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |