Cargando…

A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes ischaemic brain injury. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) is a major determinant of cerebral blood flow. Thus, mild hypercapnia in the 24 h following cardiac arrest may increase cerebral blood flow and attenuate such injury. We describe the Carbon Control an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eastwood, Glenn M, Schneider, Antoine G, Suzuki, Satoshi, Bailey, Michael, Bellomo, Rinaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0676-3
_version_ 1782366220810452992
author Eastwood, Glenn M
Schneider, Antoine G
Suzuki, Satoshi
Bailey, Michael
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_facet Eastwood, Glenn M
Schneider, Antoine G
Suzuki, Satoshi
Bailey, Michael
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_sort Eastwood, Glenn M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes ischaemic brain injury. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) is a major determinant of cerebral blood flow. Thus, mild hypercapnia in the 24 h following cardiac arrest may increase cerebral blood flow and attenuate such injury. We describe the Carbon Control and Cardiac Arrest (CCC) trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The CCC trial is a pilot multicentre feasibility, safety and biological efficacy randomized controlled trial recruiting adult cardiac arrest patients admitted to the intensive care unit after return of spontaneous circulation. At admission, using concealed allocation, participants are randomized to 24 h of either normocapnia (PaCO(2) 35 to 45 mmHg) or mild hypercapnia (PaCO(2) 50 to 55 mmHg). Key feasibility outcomes are recruitment rate and protocol compliance rate. The primary biological efficacy and biological safety measures are the between-groups difference in serum neuron-specific enolase and S100b protein levels at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Secondary outcome measure include adverse events, in-hospital mortality, and neurological assessment at 6 months. DISCUSSION: The trial commenced in December 2012 and, when completed, will provide clinical evidence as to whether targeting mild hypercapnia for 24 h following intensive care unit admission for cardiac arrest patients is feasible and safe and whether it results in decreased concentrations of neurological injury biomarkers compared with normocapnia. Trial results will also be used to determine whether a phase IIb study powered for survival at 90 days is feasible and justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000690853.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4393877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43938772015-04-13 A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Eastwood, Glenn M Schneider, Antoine G Suzuki, Satoshi Bailey, Michael Bellomo, Rinaldo Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes ischaemic brain injury. Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)) is a major determinant of cerebral blood flow. Thus, mild hypercapnia in the 24 h following cardiac arrest may increase cerebral blood flow and attenuate such injury. We describe the Carbon Control and Cardiac Arrest (CCC) trial. METHODS/DESIGN: The CCC trial is a pilot multicentre feasibility, safety and biological efficacy randomized controlled trial recruiting adult cardiac arrest patients admitted to the intensive care unit after return of spontaneous circulation. At admission, using concealed allocation, participants are randomized to 24 h of either normocapnia (PaCO(2) 35 to 45 mmHg) or mild hypercapnia (PaCO(2) 50 to 55 mmHg). Key feasibility outcomes are recruitment rate and protocol compliance rate. The primary biological efficacy and biological safety measures are the between-groups difference in serum neuron-specific enolase and S100b protein levels at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Secondary outcome measure include adverse events, in-hospital mortality, and neurological assessment at 6 months. DISCUSSION: The trial commenced in December 2012 and, when completed, will provide clinical evidence as to whether targeting mild hypercapnia for 24 h following intensive care unit admission for cardiac arrest patients is feasible and safe and whether it results in decreased concentrations of neurological injury biomarkers compared with normocapnia. Trial results will also be used to determine whether a phase IIb study powered for survival at 90 days is feasible and justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000690853. BioMed Central 2015-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4393877/ /pubmed/25872502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0676-3 Text en © Eastwood et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Eastwood, Glenn M
Schneider, Antoine G
Suzuki, Satoshi
Bailey, Michael
Bellomo, Rinaldo
A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short A pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort pilot feasibility, safety and biological efficacy multicentre trial of therapeutic hypercapnia after cardiac arrest: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0676-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eastwoodglennm apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schneiderantoineg apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suzukisatoshi apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baileymichael apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bellomorinaldo apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT apilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eastwoodglennm pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schneiderantoineg pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suzukisatoshi pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baileymichael pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bellomorinaldo pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pilotfeasibilitysafetyandbiologicalefficacymulticentretrialoftherapeutichypercapniaaftercardiacarreststudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial