Cargando…
Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program
BACKGROUND: Clinical education is an important component of many health professional training programs. There is a range of questionnaires to assess the quality of the clinical educator however none are in student-led clinic environments. The present study developed a questionnaire to assess the qua...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0358-6 |
_version_ | 1782367450112720896 |
---|---|
author | Vaughan, Brett |
author_facet | Vaughan, Brett |
author_sort | Vaughan, Brett |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical education is an important component of many health professional training programs. There is a range of questionnaires to assess the quality of the clinical educator however none are in student-led clinic environments. The present study developed a questionnaire to assess the quality of the clinical educators in the osteopathy program at Victoria University. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was used to identify questionnaires that evaluated the quality of clinical teaching. Eighty-three items were extracted and reviewed for their appropriateness to include in a questionnaire by students, clinical educators and academics. A fifty-six item questionnaire was then trialled with osteopathy students. A variety of statistics were used to determine the number of factors to extract. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to investigate the factor structure. RESULTS: The number of factors to extract was calculated to be between 3 and 6. Review of the factor structures suggested the most appropriate fit was four and five factors. The EFA of the four-factor solution collapsed into three factors. The five-factor solution demonstrated the most stable structure. Internal consistency of the five-factor solution was greater than 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The five factors were labelled Learning Environment (Factor 1), Reflective Practice (Factor 2), Feedback (Factor 3) and Patient Management (Factor 4) and Modelling (Factor 5). Further research is now required to continue investigating the construct validity and reliability of the questionnaire. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0358-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4404120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44041202015-04-21 Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program Vaughan, Brett BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical education is an important component of many health professional training programs. There is a range of questionnaires to assess the quality of the clinical educator however none are in student-led clinic environments. The present study developed a questionnaire to assess the quality of the clinical educators in the osteopathy program at Victoria University. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was used to identify questionnaires that evaluated the quality of clinical teaching. Eighty-three items were extracted and reviewed for their appropriateness to include in a questionnaire by students, clinical educators and academics. A fifty-six item questionnaire was then trialled with osteopathy students. A variety of statistics were used to determine the number of factors to extract. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to investigate the factor structure. RESULTS: The number of factors to extract was calculated to be between 3 and 6. Review of the factor structures suggested the most appropriate fit was four and five factors. The EFA of the four-factor solution collapsed into three factors. The five-factor solution demonstrated the most stable structure. Internal consistency of the five-factor solution was greater than 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The five factors were labelled Learning Environment (Factor 1), Reflective Practice (Factor 2), Feedback (Factor 3) and Patient Management (Factor 4) and Modelling (Factor 5). Further research is now required to continue investigating the construct validity and reliability of the questionnaire. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0358-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4404120/ /pubmed/25885108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0358-6 Text en © Vaughan; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vaughan, Brett Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
title | Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
title_full | Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
title_fullStr | Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
title_short | Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
title_sort | developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0358-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaughanbrett developingaclinicalteachingqualityquestionnaireforuseinauniversityosteopathicpreregistrationteachingprogram |