Cargando…
Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25727067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21891 |
_version_ | 1782367829899608064 |
---|---|
author | Spencer, Amy V. Cox, Angela Lin, Wei‐Yu Easton, Douglas F. Michailidou, Kyriaki Walters, Kevin |
author_facet | Spencer, Amy V. Cox, Angela Lin, Wei‐Yu Easton, Douglas F. Michailidou, Kyriaki Walters, Kevin |
author_sort | Spencer, Amy V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mean of zero. However, the prior variance (W) must be specified. Because of the potentially high sensitivity of the WBF to the choice of W, we propose several new BF approximations with [Formula: see text] , but allow W to take a probability distribution rather than a fixed value. We provide several prior distributions for W which lead to BFs that can be calculated easily in freely available software packages. These priors allow a wide range of densities for W and provide considerable flexibility. We examine some properties of the priors and BFs and show how to determine the most appropriate prior based on elicited quantiles of the prior odds ratio (OR). We show by simulation that our novel BFs have superior true‐positive rates at low false‐positive rates compared to those from both P‐value and WBF analyses across a range of sample sizes and ORs. We give an example of utilizing our BFs to fine‐map the CASP8 region using genotype data on approximately 46,000 breast cancer case and 43,000 healthy control samples from the Collaborative Oncological Gene‐environment Study (COGS) Consortium, and compare the single‐nucleotide polymorphism ranks to those obtained using WBFs and P‐values from univariate logistic regression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4406822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44068222016-05-01 Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies Spencer, Amy V. Cox, Angela Lin, Wei‐Yu Easton, Douglas F. Michailidou, Kyriaki Walters, Kevin Genet Epidemiol Research Articles Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mean of zero. However, the prior variance (W) must be specified. Because of the potentially high sensitivity of the WBF to the choice of W, we propose several new BF approximations with [Formula: see text] , but allow W to take a probability distribution rather than a fixed value. We provide several prior distributions for W which lead to BFs that can be calculated easily in freely available software packages. These priors allow a wide range of densities for W and provide considerable flexibility. We examine some properties of the priors and BFs and show how to determine the most appropriate prior based on elicited quantiles of the prior odds ratio (OR). We show by simulation that our novel BFs have superior true‐positive rates at low false‐positive rates compared to those from both P‐value and WBF analyses across a range of sample sizes and ORs. We give an example of utilizing our BFs to fine‐map the CASP8 region using genotype data on approximately 46,000 breast cancer case and 43,000 healthy control samples from the Collaborative Oncological Gene‐environment Study (COGS) Consortium, and compare the single‐nucleotide polymorphism ranks to those obtained using WBFs and P‐values from univariate logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-27 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4406822/ /pubmed/25727067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21891 Text en © 2015 The Authors. *Genetic Epidemiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Spencer, Amy V. Cox, Angela Lin, Wei‐Yu Easton, Douglas F. Michailidou, Kyriaki Walters, Kevin Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies |
title | Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies |
title_full | Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies |
title_fullStr | Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies |
title_short | Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies |
title_sort | novel bayes factors that capture expert uncertainty in prior density specification in genetic association studies |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25727067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21891 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spenceramyv novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies AT coxangela novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies AT linweiyu novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies AT eastondouglasf novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies AT michailidoukyriaki novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies AT walterskevin novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies |