Cargando…

Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies

Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spencer, Amy V., Cox, Angela, Lin, Wei‐Yu, Easton, Douglas F., Michailidou, Kyriaki, Walters, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25727067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21891
_version_ 1782367829899608064
author Spencer, Amy V.
Cox, Angela
Lin, Wei‐Yu
Easton, Douglas F.
Michailidou, Kyriaki
Walters, Kevin
author_facet Spencer, Amy V.
Cox, Angela
Lin, Wei‐Yu
Easton, Douglas F.
Michailidou, Kyriaki
Walters, Kevin
author_sort Spencer, Amy V.
collection PubMed
description Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mean of zero. However, the prior variance (W) must be specified. Because of the potentially high sensitivity of the WBF to the choice of W, we propose several new BF approximations with [Formula: see text] , but allow W to take a probability distribution rather than a fixed value. We provide several prior distributions for W which lead to BFs that can be calculated easily in freely available software packages. These priors allow a wide range of densities for W and provide considerable flexibility. We examine some properties of the priors and BFs and show how to determine the most appropriate prior based on elicited quantiles of the prior odds ratio (OR). We show by simulation that our novel BFs have superior true‐positive rates at low false‐positive rates compared to those from both P‐value and WBF analyses across a range of sample sizes and ORs. We give an example of utilizing our BFs to fine‐map the CASP8 region using genotype data on approximately 46,000 breast cancer case and 43,000 healthy control samples from the Collaborative Oncological Gene‐environment Study (COGS) Consortium, and compare the single‐nucleotide polymorphism ranks to those obtained using WBFs and P‐values from univariate logistic regression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4406822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44068222016-05-01 Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies Spencer, Amy V. Cox, Angela Lin, Wei‐Yu Easton, Douglas F. Michailidou, Kyriaki Walters, Kevin Genet Epidemiol Research Articles Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mean of zero. However, the prior variance (W) must be specified. Because of the potentially high sensitivity of the WBF to the choice of W, we propose several new BF approximations with [Formula: see text] , but allow W to take a probability distribution rather than a fixed value. We provide several prior distributions for W which lead to BFs that can be calculated easily in freely available software packages. These priors allow a wide range of densities for W and provide considerable flexibility. We examine some properties of the priors and BFs and show how to determine the most appropriate prior based on elicited quantiles of the prior odds ratio (OR). We show by simulation that our novel BFs have superior true‐positive rates at low false‐positive rates compared to those from both P‐value and WBF analyses across a range of sample sizes and ORs. We give an example of utilizing our BFs to fine‐map the CASP8 region using genotype data on approximately 46,000 breast cancer case and 43,000 healthy control samples from the Collaborative Oncological Gene‐environment Study (COGS) Consortium, and compare the single‐nucleotide polymorphism ranks to those obtained using WBFs and P‐values from univariate logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-02-27 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4406822/ /pubmed/25727067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21891 Text en © 2015 The Authors. *Genetic Epidemiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Spencer, Amy V.
Cox, Angela
Lin, Wei‐Yu
Easton, Douglas F.
Michailidou, Kyriaki
Walters, Kevin
Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
title Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
title_full Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
title_fullStr Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
title_full_unstemmed Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
title_short Novel Bayes Factors That Capture Expert Uncertainty in Prior Density Specification in Genetic Association Studies
title_sort novel bayes factors that capture expert uncertainty in prior density specification in genetic association studies
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25727067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21891
work_keys_str_mv AT spenceramyv novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies
AT coxangela novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies
AT linweiyu novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies
AT eastondouglasf novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies
AT michailidoukyriaki novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies
AT walterskevin novelbayesfactorsthatcaptureexpertuncertaintyinpriordensityspecificationingeneticassociationstudies