Cargando…

Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution

In protein evolution, due to functional and biophysical constraints, the rates of amino acid substitution differ from site to site. Among the best predictors of site-specific rates are solvent accessibility and packing density. The packing density measure that best correlates with rates is the weigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcos, María Laura, Echave, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25922797
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.911
_version_ 1782368491902337024
author Marcos, María Laura
Echave, Julian
author_facet Marcos, María Laura
Echave, Julian
author_sort Marcos, María Laura
collection PubMed
description In protein evolution, due to functional and biophysical constraints, the rates of amino acid substitution differ from site to site. Among the best predictors of site-specific rates are solvent accessibility and packing density. The packing density measure that best correlates with rates is the weighted contact number (WCN), the sum of inverse square distances between a site’s C(α) and the C(α) of the other sites. According to a mechanistic stress model proposed recently, rates are determined by packing because mutating packed sites stresses and destabilizes the protein’s active conformation. While WCN is a measure of C(α) packing, mutations replace side chains. Here, we consider whether a site’s evolutionary divergence is constrained by main-chain packing or side-chain packing. To address this issue, we extended the stress theory to model side chains explicitly. The theory predicts that rates should depend solely on side-chain contact density. We tested this prediction on a data set of structurally and functionally diverse monomeric enzymes. We compared side-chain contact density with main-chain contact density measures and with relative solvent accessibility (RSA). We found that side-chain contact density is the best predictor of rate variation among sites (it explains 39.2% of the variation). Moreover, the independent contribution of main-chain contact density measures and RSA are negligible. Thus, as predicted by the stress theory, site-specific evolutionary rates are determined by side-chain packing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4411540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44115402015-04-28 Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution Marcos, María Laura Echave, Julian PeerJ Biophysics In protein evolution, due to functional and biophysical constraints, the rates of amino acid substitution differ from site to site. Among the best predictors of site-specific rates are solvent accessibility and packing density. The packing density measure that best correlates with rates is the weighted contact number (WCN), the sum of inverse square distances between a site’s C(α) and the C(α) of the other sites. According to a mechanistic stress model proposed recently, rates are determined by packing because mutating packed sites stresses and destabilizes the protein’s active conformation. While WCN is a measure of C(α) packing, mutations replace side chains. Here, we consider whether a site’s evolutionary divergence is constrained by main-chain packing or side-chain packing. To address this issue, we extended the stress theory to model side chains explicitly. The theory predicts that rates should depend solely on side-chain contact density. We tested this prediction on a data set of structurally and functionally diverse monomeric enzymes. We compared side-chain contact density with main-chain contact density measures and with relative solvent accessibility (RSA). We found that side-chain contact density is the best predictor of rate variation among sites (it explains 39.2% of the variation). Moreover, the independent contribution of main-chain contact density measures and RSA are negligible. Thus, as predicted by the stress theory, site-specific evolutionary rates are determined by side-chain packing. PeerJ Inc. 2015-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4411540/ /pubmed/25922797 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.911 Text en © 2015 Marcos and Echave http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biophysics
Marcos, María Laura
Echave, Julian
Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
title Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
title_full Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
title_fullStr Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
title_full_unstemmed Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
title_short Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
title_sort too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution
topic Biophysics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4411540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25922797
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.911
work_keys_str_mv AT marcosmarialaura toopackedtochangesidechainpackingandsitespecificsubstitutionratesinproteinevolution
AT echavejulian toopackedtochangesidechainpackingandsitespecificsubstitutionratesinproteinevolution