Cargando…

The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students

BACKGROUND: Learning styles and approaches of individual undergraduate medical students vary considerably and as a consequence, their learning needs also differ from one student to another. This study was conducted to identify different learning styles and approaches of pre-clinical, undergraduate m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liew, Siaw-Cheok, Sidhu, Jagmohni, Barua, Ankur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0
_version_ 1782368918701080576
author Liew, Siaw-Cheok
Sidhu, Jagmohni
Barua, Ankur
author_facet Liew, Siaw-Cheok
Sidhu, Jagmohni
Barua, Ankur
author_sort Liew, Siaw-Cheok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning styles and approaches of individual undergraduate medical students vary considerably and as a consequence, their learning needs also differ from one student to another. This study was conducted to identify different learning styles and approaches of pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students and also to determine the relationships of learning preferences with performances in the summative examinations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 419 pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students of the International Medical University (IMU) in Kuala Lumpur. The number of students from Year 2 was 217 while that from Year 3 was 202. The Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaires were used for data collection. RESULTS: This study revealed that 343 students (81.9%) had unimodal learning style, while the remaining 76 (18.1%) used a multimodal learning style. Among the unimodal learners, a majority (30.1%) were of Kinesthetic (K) type. Among the middle and high achievers in summative examinations, a majority had unimodal (Kinaesthetic) learning style (30.5%) and were also strategic/deep learners (79.4%). However, the learning styles and approaches did not contribute significantly towards the learning outcomes in summative examinations. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of the students in this study had Unimodal (Kinesthetic) learning style. The learning preferences (styles and approaches) did not contribute significantly to the learning outcomes. Future work to re-assess the viability of these learning preferences (styles and approaches) after the incorporation of teaching-learning instructions tailored specifically to the students will be beneficial to help medical teachers in facilitating students to become more capable learners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4414371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44143712015-04-30 The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students Liew, Siaw-Cheok Sidhu, Jagmohni Barua, Ankur BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Learning styles and approaches of individual undergraduate medical students vary considerably and as a consequence, their learning needs also differ from one student to another. This study was conducted to identify different learning styles and approaches of pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students and also to determine the relationships of learning preferences with performances in the summative examinations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 419 pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students of the International Medical University (IMU) in Kuala Lumpur. The number of students from Year 2 was 217 while that from Year 3 was 202. The Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaires were used for data collection. RESULTS: This study revealed that 343 students (81.9%) had unimodal learning style, while the remaining 76 (18.1%) used a multimodal learning style. Among the unimodal learners, a majority (30.1%) were of Kinesthetic (K) type. Among the middle and high achievers in summative examinations, a majority had unimodal (Kinaesthetic) learning style (30.5%) and were also strategic/deep learners (79.4%). However, the learning styles and approaches did not contribute significantly towards the learning outcomes in summative examinations. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of the students in this study had Unimodal (Kinesthetic) learning style. The learning preferences (styles and approaches) did not contribute significantly to the learning outcomes. Future work to re-assess the viability of these learning preferences (styles and approaches) after the incorporation of teaching-learning instructions tailored specifically to the students will be beneficial to help medical teachers in facilitating students to become more capable learners. BioMed Central 2015-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4414371/ /pubmed/25889887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0 Text en © Liew et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liew, Siaw-Cheok
Sidhu, Jagmohni
Barua, Ankur
The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
title The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
title_full The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
title_fullStr The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
title_short The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
title_sort relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4414371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0
work_keys_str_mv AT liewsiawcheok therelationshipbetweenlearningpreferencesstylesandapproachesandlearningoutcomesamongpreclinicalundergraduatemedicalstudents
AT sidhujagmohni therelationshipbetweenlearningpreferencesstylesandapproachesandlearningoutcomesamongpreclinicalundergraduatemedicalstudents
AT baruaankur therelationshipbetweenlearningpreferencesstylesandapproachesandlearningoutcomesamongpreclinicalundergraduatemedicalstudents
AT liewsiawcheok relationshipbetweenlearningpreferencesstylesandapproachesandlearningoutcomesamongpreclinicalundergraduatemedicalstudents
AT sidhujagmohni relationshipbetweenlearningpreferencesstylesandapproachesandlearningoutcomesamongpreclinicalundergraduatemedicalstudents
AT baruaankur relationshipbetweenlearningpreferencesstylesandapproachesandlearningoutcomesamongpreclinicalundergraduatemedicalstudents