Cargando…

Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus

Two coding variants in the APOL1 gene (G1 and G2) explain most of the high rate of kidney disease in African Americans. APOL1-associated kidney disease risk inheritance follows an autosomal recessive pattern: The relative risk of kidney disease associated with inheritance of two high-risk variants i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruchi, Rupam, Genovese, Giulio, Lee, Jessica, Charoonratana, Victoria T., Bernhardy, Andrea J., Alper, Seth L., Kopp, Jeffrey B., Thadhani, Ravi, Friedman, David J., Pollak, Martin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125410
_version_ 1782369278624792576
author Ruchi, Rupam
Genovese, Giulio
Lee, Jessica
Charoonratana, Victoria T.
Bernhardy, Andrea J.
Alper, Seth L.
Kopp, Jeffrey B.
Thadhani, Ravi
Friedman, David J.
Pollak, Martin R.
author_facet Ruchi, Rupam
Genovese, Giulio
Lee, Jessica
Charoonratana, Victoria T.
Bernhardy, Andrea J.
Alper, Seth L.
Kopp, Jeffrey B.
Thadhani, Ravi
Friedman, David J.
Pollak, Martin R.
author_sort Ruchi, Rupam
collection PubMed
description Two coding variants in the APOL1 gene (G1 and G2) explain most of the high rate of kidney disease in African Americans. APOL1-associated kidney disease risk inheritance follows an autosomal recessive pattern: The relative risk of kidney disease associated with inheritance of two high-risk variants is 7–30 fold, depending on the specific kidney phenotype. We wished to determine if the variability in phenotype might in part reflect structural differences in APOL1 gene. We analyzed sequence coverage from 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 samples as well as exome sequencing data from African American kidney disease cases for copy number variation. 8 samples sequenced in the 1000 Genomes Project showed increased coverage over a ~100kb region that includes APOL2, APOL1 and part of MYH9, suggesting the presence of APOL1 copy number greater than 2. We reasoned that such duplications should be enriched in apparent G1 heterozygotes with kidney disease. Using a PCR-based assay, we observed the presence of this duplication in additional samples from apparent G0G1 or G0G2 individuals. The frequency of this APOL1 duplication was compared among cases (n = 123) and controls (n = 255) with apparent G0G1 heterozygosity. The presence of APOL1 duplication was observed in 4.06% of cases and 0.78% controls, preliminary evidence that this APOL1 duplication may alter susceptibility to kidney disease (p = 0.03). Taqman-based copy number assays confirmed the presence of 3 APOL1 copies in individuals positive for this specific duplication by PCR assay, but also identified a small number of individuals with additional APOL1 copies of presumably different structure. These observations motivate further studies to better assess the contribution of APOL1 copy number on kidney disease risk and on APOL1 function. Investigators and clinicians genotyping APOL1 should also consider whether the particular genotyping platform used is subject to technical errors when more than two copies of APOL1 are present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4416782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44167822015-05-07 Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus Ruchi, Rupam Genovese, Giulio Lee, Jessica Charoonratana, Victoria T. Bernhardy, Andrea J. Alper, Seth L. Kopp, Jeffrey B. Thadhani, Ravi Friedman, David J. Pollak, Martin R. PLoS One Research Article Two coding variants in the APOL1 gene (G1 and G2) explain most of the high rate of kidney disease in African Americans. APOL1-associated kidney disease risk inheritance follows an autosomal recessive pattern: The relative risk of kidney disease associated with inheritance of two high-risk variants is 7–30 fold, depending on the specific kidney phenotype. We wished to determine if the variability in phenotype might in part reflect structural differences in APOL1 gene. We analyzed sequence coverage from 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 samples as well as exome sequencing data from African American kidney disease cases for copy number variation. 8 samples sequenced in the 1000 Genomes Project showed increased coverage over a ~100kb region that includes APOL2, APOL1 and part of MYH9, suggesting the presence of APOL1 copy number greater than 2. We reasoned that such duplications should be enriched in apparent G1 heterozygotes with kidney disease. Using a PCR-based assay, we observed the presence of this duplication in additional samples from apparent G0G1 or G0G2 individuals. The frequency of this APOL1 duplication was compared among cases (n = 123) and controls (n = 255) with apparent G0G1 heterozygosity. The presence of APOL1 duplication was observed in 4.06% of cases and 0.78% controls, preliminary evidence that this APOL1 duplication may alter susceptibility to kidney disease (p = 0.03). Taqman-based copy number assays confirmed the presence of 3 APOL1 copies in individuals positive for this specific duplication by PCR assay, but also identified a small number of individuals with additional APOL1 copies of presumably different structure. These observations motivate further studies to better assess the contribution of APOL1 copy number on kidney disease risk and on APOL1 function. Investigators and clinicians genotyping APOL1 should also consider whether the particular genotyping platform used is subject to technical errors when more than two copies of APOL1 are present. Public Library of Science 2015-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4416782/ /pubmed/25933006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125410 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruchi, Rupam
Genovese, Giulio
Lee, Jessica
Charoonratana, Victoria T.
Bernhardy, Andrea J.
Alper, Seth L.
Kopp, Jeffrey B.
Thadhani, Ravi
Friedman, David J.
Pollak, Martin R.
Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus
title Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus
title_full Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus
title_fullStr Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus
title_full_unstemmed Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus
title_short Copy Number Variation at the APOL1 Locus
title_sort copy number variation at the apol1 locus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4416782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125410
work_keys_str_mv AT ruchirupam copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT genovesegiulio copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT leejessica copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT charoonratanavictoriat copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT bernhardyandreaj copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT alpersethl copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT koppjeffreyb copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT thadhaniravi copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT friedmandavidj copynumbervariationattheapol1locus
AT pollakmartinr copynumbervariationattheapol1locus