Cargando…

Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature

Renewable in vitro cell cultures, such as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), have facilitated studies that contributed to our understanding of genetic influence on human traits. However, the degree to which cell lines faithfully maintain differences in donor-specific phenotypes is still debated. We h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Samantha M., Kagan, Courtney, Pavlovic, Bryan J., Burnett, Jonathan, Patterson, Kristen, Pritchard, Jonathan K., Gilad, Yoav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25950834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005216
_version_ 1782370263162159104
author Thomas, Samantha M.
Kagan, Courtney
Pavlovic, Bryan J.
Burnett, Jonathan
Patterson, Kristen
Pritchard, Jonathan K.
Gilad, Yoav
author_facet Thomas, Samantha M.
Kagan, Courtney
Pavlovic, Bryan J.
Burnett, Jonathan
Patterson, Kristen
Pritchard, Jonathan K.
Gilad, Yoav
author_sort Thomas, Samantha M.
collection PubMed
description Renewable in vitro cell cultures, such as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), have facilitated studies that contributed to our understanding of genetic influence on human traits. However, the degree to which cell lines faithfully maintain differences in donor-specific phenotypes is still debated. We have previously reported that standard cell line maintenance practice results in a loss of donor-specific gene expression signatures in LCLs. An alternative to the LCL model is the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) system, which carries the potential to model tissue-specific physiology through the use of differentiation protocols. Still, existing LCL banks represent an important source of starting material for iPSC generation, and it is possible that the disruptions in gene regulation associated with long-term LCL maintenance could persist through the reprogramming process. To address this concern, we studied the effect of reprogramming mature LCL cultures from six unrelated donors to iPSCs on the ensuing gene expression patterns within and between individuals. We show that the reprogramming process results in a recovery of donor-specific gene regulatory signatures, increasing the number of genes with a detectable donor effect by an order of magnitude. The proportion of variation in gene expression statistically attributed to donor increases from 6.9% in LCLs to 24.5% in iPSCs (P < 10(-15)). Since environmental contributions are unlikely to be a source of individual variation in our system of highly passaged cultured cell lines, our observations suggest that the effect of genotype on gene regulation is more pronounced in iPSCs than in LCLs. Our findings indicate that iPSCs can be a powerful model system for studies of phenotypic variation across individuals in general, and the genetic association with variation in gene regulation in particular. We further conclude that LCLs are an appropriate starting material for iPSC generation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4423863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44238632015-05-13 Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature Thomas, Samantha M. Kagan, Courtney Pavlovic, Bryan J. Burnett, Jonathan Patterson, Kristen Pritchard, Jonathan K. Gilad, Yoav PLoS Genet Research Article Renewable in vitro cell cultures, such as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), have facilitated studies that contributed to our understanding of genetic influence on human traits. However, the degree to which cell lines faithfully maintain differences in donor-specific phenotypes is still debated. We have previously reported that standard cell line maintenance practice results in a loss of donor-specific gene expression signatures in LCLs. An alternative to the LCL model is the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) system, which carries the potential to model tissue-specific physiology through the use of differentiation protocols. Still, existing LCL banks represent an important source of starting material for iPSC generation, and it is possible that the disruptions in gene regulation associated with long-term LCL maintenance could persist through the reprogramming process. To address this concern, we studied the effect of reprogramming mature LCL cultures from six unrelated donors to iPSCs on the ensuing gene expression patterns within and between individuals. We show that the reprogramming process results in a recovery of donor-specific gene regulatory signatures, increasing the number of genes with a detectable donor effect by an order of magnitude. The proportion of variation in gene expression statistically attributed to donor increases from 6.9% in LCLs to 24.5% in iPSCs (P < 10(-15)). Since environmental contributions are unlikely to be a source of individual variation in our system of highly passaged cultured cell lines, our observations suggest that the effect of genotype on gene regulation is more pronounced in iPSCs than in LCLs. Our findings indicate that iPSCs can be a powerful model system for studies of phenotypic variation across individuals in general, and the genetic association with variation in gene regulation in particular. We further conclude that LCLs are an appropriate starting material for iPSC generation. Public Library of Science 2015-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4423863/ /pubmed/25950834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005216 Text en © 2015 Thomas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, Samantha M.
Kagan, Courtney
Pavlovic, Bryan J.
Burnett, Jonathan
Patterson, Kristen
Pritchard, Jonathan K.
Gilad, Yoav
Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
title Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
title_full Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
title_fullStr Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
title_full_unstemmed Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
title_short Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
title_sort reprogramming lcls to ipscs results in recovery of donor-specific gene expression signature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25950834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005216
work_keys_str_mv AT thomassamantham reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature
AT kagancourtney reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature
AT pavlovicbryanj reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature
AT burnettjonathan reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature
AT pattersonkristen reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature
AT pritchardjonathank reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature
AT giladyoav reprogramminglclstoipscsresultsinrecoveryofdonorspecificgeneexpressionsignature