Cargando…
Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable?
Sugar consumption, especially added sugars, is under attack. Various government and health authorities have suggested new sugar recommendations and guidelines as low as 5% of total calories from free sugars. Definitions for total sugars, free sugars, and added sugars are not standardized, nor are th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7042866 |
_version_ | 1782370458246578176 |
---|---|
author | Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne |
author_facet | Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne |
author_sort | Erickson, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sugar consumption, especially added sugars, is under attack. Various government and health authorities have suggested new sugar recommendations and guidelines as low as 5% of total calories from free sugars. Definitions for total sugars, free sugars, and added sugars are not standardized, nor are there accepted nutrient databases for this information. Our objective was to measure total sugars and added sugars in sample meal plans created by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND). Utilizing the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) nutritional database, results found that plans created by the USDA and AND averaged 5.1% and 3.1% calories from added sugar, 8.7% and 3.1% from free sugar, and 23.3% and 21.1% as total sugars respectively. Compliance with proposed added sugar recommendations would require strict dietary compliance and may not be sustainable for many Americans. Without an accepted definition and equation for calculating added sugar, added sugar recommendations are arbitrary and may reduce intakes of nutrient-rich, recommended foods, such as yogurt, whole grains, and tart fruits including cranberries, cherries, and grapefruit. Added sugars are one part of excess calorie intake; however, compliance with low added sugar recommendations may not be achievable for the general public. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4425178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44251782015-05-11 Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne Nutrients Article Sugar consumption, especially added sugars, is under attack. Various government and health authorities have suggested new sugar recommendations and guidelines as low as 5% of total calories from free sugars. Definitions for total sugars, free sugars, and added sugars are not standardized, nor are there accepted nutrient databases for this information. Our objective was to measure total sugars and added sugars in sample meal plans created by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND). Utilizing the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) nutritional database, results found that plans created by the USDA and AND averaged 5.1% and 3.1% calories from added sugar, 8.7% and 3.1% from free sugar, and 23.3% and 21.1% as total sugars respectively. Compliance with proposed added sugar recommendations would require strict dietary compliance and may not be sustainable for many Americans. Without an accepted definition and equation for calculating added sugar, added sugar recommendations are arbitrary and may reduce intakes of nutrient-rich, recommended foods, such as yogurt, whole grains, and tart fruits including cranberries, cherries, and grapefruit. Added sugars are one part of excess calorie intake; however, compliance with low added sugar recommendations may not be achievable for the general public. MDPI 2015-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4425178/ /pubmed/25884659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7042866 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? |
title | Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? |
title_full | Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? |
title_fullStr | Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? |
title_full_unstemmed | Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? |
title_short | Total, Added, and Free Sugars: Are Restrictive Guidelines Science-Based or Achievable? |
title_sort | total, added, and free sugars: are restrictive guidelines science-based or achievable? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7042866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ericksonjennifer totaladdedandfreesugarsarerestrictiveguidelinessciencebasedorachievable AT slavinjoanne totaladdedandfreesugarsarerestrictiveguidelinessciencebasedorachievable |