Cargando…
The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25973207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-7-3 |
_version_ | 1782371039418777600 |
---|---|
author | Cheema, Birinder S Davies, Timothy B Stewart, Matthew Papalia, Shona Atlantis, Evan |
author_facet | Cheema, Birinder S Davies, Timothy B Stewart, Matthew Papalia, Shona Atlantis, Evan |
author_sort | Cheema, Birinder S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week boxing training (HIIT) intervention compared with an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT) in obese adults. METHODS: Men and women with abdominal obesity and body mass index >25 kg/m(2) were randomized to either a boxing group or a brisk walking (control) group for 12 weeks. Each group engaged in 4 training sessions per week, equated for total physical activity. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, assessment of training intensities, adherence and adverse events. Effectiveness was assessed pre and post intervention via pertinent obesity-, cardiovascular-, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. RESULTS: Nineteen individuals expressed an interest and 63% (n = 12) consented. Recruitment was slower than anticipated (1.3 participants/week). The boxing group trained at a significantly higher intensity each week versus the brisk walking group (p < 0.05). Two participants in the boxing group experienced an adverse event; both continued to exercise with modifications to the exercise program. No other adverse events were noted. The boxing group attended more sessions (79% vs. 55%) and had a lower attrition rate (n = 0 vs. n = 2) than the walking group. Analysis of covariance revealed that the boxing group significantly improved body fat percentage (p = 0.047), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.026), augmentation index (AIx; p < 0.001), absolute VO(2max) (p = 0.015), and Physical Functioning (p = 0.042) and Vitality (p = 0.024) domains of HRQoL over time. The walking group did not improve any clinical outcomes, and experienced a worsening of Vitality (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Boxing training (HIIT) in adults with abdominal obesity is feasible and may elicit a better therapeutic effect on obesity, cardiovascular, and HRQoL outcomes than an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT). Robustly designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and inform clinical guidelines and practice for obesity treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ACTRN12615000007538 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4429464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44294642015-05-14 The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study Cheema, Birinder S Davies, Timothy B Stewart, Matthew Papalia, Shona Atlantis, Evan BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed on exercise cycle or treadmill is considered safe and often more beneficial for fat loss and cardiometabolic health than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-week boxing training (HIIT) intervention compared with an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT) in obese adults. METHODS: Men and women with abdominal obesity and body mass index >25 kg/m(2) were randomized to either a boxing group or a brisk walking (control) group for 12 weeks. Each group engaged in 4 training sessions per week, equated for total physical activity. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rates, assessment of training intensities, adherence and adverse events. Effectiveness was assessed pre and post intervention via pertinent obesity-, cardiovascular-, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. RESULTS: Nineteen individuals expressed an interest and 63% (n = 12) consented. Recruitment was slower than anticipated (1.3 participants/week). The boxing group trained at a significantly higher intensity each week versus the brisk walking group (p < 0.05). Two participants in the boxing group experienced an adverse event; both continued to exercise with modifications to the exercise program. No other adverse events were noted. The boxing group attended more sessions (79% vs. 55%) and had a lower attrition rate (n = 0 vs. n = 2) than the walking group. Analysis of covariance revealed that the boxing group significantly improved body fat percentage (p = 0.047), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.026), augmentation index (AIx; p < 0.001), absolute VO(2max) (p = 0.015), and Physical Functioning (p = 0.042) and Vitality (p = 0.024) domains of HRQoL over time. The walking group did not improve any clinical outcomes, and experienced a worsening of Vitality (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Boxing training (HIIT) in adults with abdominal obesity is feasible and may elicit a better therapeutic effect on obesity, cardiovascular, and HRQoL outcomes than an equivalent dose of brisk walking (MICT). Robustly designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and inform clinical guidelines and practice for obesity treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ACTRN12615000007538 BioMed Central 2015-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4429464/ /pubmed/25973207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-7-3 Text en © Cheema et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cheema, Birinder S Davies, Timothy B Stewart, Matthew Papalia, Shona Atlantis, Evan The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
title | The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
title_full | The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
title_short | The feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
title_sort | feasibility and effectiveness of high-intensity boxing training versus moderate-intensity brisk walking in adults with abdominal obesity: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25973207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-7-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheemabirinders thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT daviestimothyb thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT stewartmatthew thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT papaliashona thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT atlantisevan thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT cheemabirinders feasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT daviestimothyb feasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT stewartmatthew feasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT papaliashona feasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy AT atlantisevan feasibilityandeffectivenessofhighintensityboxingtrainingversusmoderateintensitybriskwalkinginadultswithabdominalobesityapilotstudy |