Cargando…

Parameters Influencing Baseline HIV-1 Genotypic Tropism Testing Related to Clinical Outcome in Patients on Maraviroc

OBJECTIVES: We analysed the impact of different parameters on genotypic tropism testing related to clinical outcome prediction in 108 patients on maraviroc (MVC) treatment. METHODS: 87 RNA and 60 DNA samples were used. The viral tropism was predicted using the geno2pheno([coreceptor]) and T-CUP tool...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sierra, Saleta, Dybowski, J. Nikolai, Pironti, Alejandro, Heider, Dominik, Güney, Lisa, Thielen, Alex, Reuter, Stefan, Esser, Stefan, Fätkenheuer, Gerd, Lengauer, Thomas, Hoffmann, Daniel, Pfister, Herbert, Jensen, Björn, Kaiser, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4430318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25970632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125502
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: We analysed the impact of different parameters on genotypic tropism testing related to clinical outcome prediction in 108 patients on maraviroc (MVC) treatment. METHODS: 87 RNA and 60 DNA samples were used. The viral tropism was predicted using the geno2pheno([coreceptor]) and T-CUP tools with FPR cut-offs ranging from 1%-20%. Additionally, 27 RNA and 28 DNA samples were analysed in triplicate, 43 samples with the ESTA assay and 45 with next-generation sequencing. The influence of the genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) and 16 MVC-resistance mutations on clinical outcome was also studied. RESULTS: Concordance between single-amplification testing compared to ESTA and to NGS was in the order of 80%. Concordance with NGS was higher at lower FPR cut-offs. Detection of baseline R5 viruses in RNA and DNA samples by all methods significantly correlated with treatment success, even with FPR cut-offs of 3.75%-7.5%. Triple amplification did not improve the prediction value but reduced the number of patients eligible for MVC. No influence of the GSS or MVC-resistance mutations but adherence to treatment, on the clinical outcome was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Proviral DNA is valid to select candidates for MVC treatment. FPR cut-offs of 5%-7.5% and single amplification from RNA or DNA would assure a safe administration of MVC without excluding many patients who could benefit from this drug. In addition, the new prediction system T-CUP produced reliable results.