Preliminary documentation of the comparable efficacy of vitoss versus NanOss bioactive as bone graft expanders for posterior cervical fusion

BACKGROUND: Laminectomies with posterior cervical instrumented fusions often utilize bone graft expanders to supplement cervical lamina/iliac crest autograft/bone marrow aspirate (BMA). Here we compared posterior fusion rates utilizing two graft expanders; Vitoss (Orthovita, Malvern, PA, USA) vs. Na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Epstein, Nancy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Surgical Neurology International: Spine
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26005578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.156559

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26005578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.156559

Ejemplares similares