Cargando…
Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics
BACKGROUND: Professional nursing practice is informed by biological, social and behavioural sciences. In undergraduate pre-registration nursing programs, biological sciences typically include anatomy, physiology, microbiology, chemistry, physics and pharmacology. The current gap in the literature re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0074-x |
_version_ | 1782372359229931520 |
---|---|
author | Birks, Melanie Ralph, Nicholas Cant, Robyn Hillman, Elspeth Chun Tie, Ylona |
author_facet | Birks, Melanie Ralph, Nicholas Cant, Robyn Hillman, Elspeth Chun Tie, Ylona |
author_sort | Birks, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Professional nursing practice is informed by biological, social and behavioural sciences. In undergraduate pre-registration nursing programs, biological sciences typically include anatomy, physiology, microbiology, chemistry, physics and pharmacology. The current gap in the literature results in a lack of information about the content and depth of biological sciences being taught in nursing curricula. The aim of this study was to establish what priority is given to the teaching of science topics in these programs in order to inform an understanding of the relative importance placed on this subject area in contemporary nursing education. METHOD: This study employed a cross-sectional survey method. This paper reports on the first phase of a larger project examining science content in nursing programs. An existing questionnaire was modified and delivered online for completion by academics who teach science to nurses in these programs. This paper reports on the relative priority given by respondents to the teaching of 177 topics contained in the questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the relatively small population of academics who teach science to nursing students, thirty (n = 30) completed the survey. Findings indicate strong support for the teaching of science in these programs, with particular priority given to the basic concepts of bioscience and gross system anatomy. Of concern, most science subject areas outside of these domains were ranked as being of moderate or low priority. CONCLUSION: While the small sample size limited the conclusions able to be drawn from this study, the findings supported previous studies that indicated inadequacies in the teaching of science content in nursing curricula. Nevertheless, these findings have raised questions about the current philosophy that underpins nursing education in Australia and whether existing practices are clearly focused on preparing students for the demands of contemporary nursing practice. Academics responsible for the design and implementation of nursing curricula are encouraged to review the content of current programs in light of the findings of this research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4438582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44385822015-05-21 Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics Birks, Melanie Ralph, Nicholas Cant, Robyn Hillman, Elspeth Chun Tie, Ylona BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Professional nursing practice is informed by biological, social and behavioural sciences. In undergraduate pre-registration nursing programs, biological sciences typically include anatomy, physiology, microbiology, chemistry, physics and pharmacology. The current gap in the literature results in a lack of information about the content and depth of biological sciences being taught in nursing curricula. The aim of this study was to establish what priority is given to the teaching of science topics in these programs in order to inform an understanding of the relative importance placed on this subject area in contemporary nursing education. METHOD: This study employed a cross-sectional survey method. This paper reports on the first phase of a larger project examining science content in nursing programs. An existing questionnaire was modified and delivered online for completion by academics who teach science to nurses in these programs. This paper reports on the relative priority given by respondents to the teaching of 177 topics contained in the questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the relatively small population of academics who teach science to nursing students, thirty (n = 30) completed the survey. Findings indicate strong support for the teaching of science in these programs, with particular priority given to the basic concepts of bioscience and gross system anatomy. Of concern, most science subject areas outside of these domains were ranked as being of moderate or low priority. CONCLUSION: While the small sample size limited the conclusions able to be drawn from this study, the findings supported previous studies that indicated inadequacies in the teaching of science content in nursing curricula. Nevertheless, these findings have raised questions about the current philosophy that underpins nursing education in Australia and whether existing practices are clearly focused on preparing students for the demands of contemporary nursing practice. Academics responsible for the design and implementation of nursing curricula are encouraged to review the content of current programs in light of the findings of this research. BioMed Central 2015-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4438582/ /pubmed/25995710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0074-x Text en © Birks et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Birks, Melanie Ralph, Nicholas Cant, Robyn Hillman, Elspeth Chun Tie, Ylona Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
title | Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
title_full | Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
title_fullStr | Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
title_full_unstemmed | Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
title_short | Teaching science content in nursing programs in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
title_sort | teaching science content in nursing programs in australia: a cross-sectional survey of academics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0074-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birksmelanie teachingsciencecontentinnursingprogramsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurveyofacademics AT ralphnicholas teachingsciencecontentinnursingprogramsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurveyofacademics AT cantrobyn teachingsciencecontentinnursingprogramsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurveyofacademics AT hillmanelspeth teachingsciencecontentinnursingprogramsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurveyofacademics AT chuntieylona teachingsciencecontentinnursingprogramsinaustraliaacrosssectionalsurveyofacademics |