Cargando…

Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms

Investigating genomic structural variants at basepair resolution is crucial for understanding their formation mechanisms. We identify and analyze 8,943 deletion breakpoints in 1,092 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project. We find breakpoints have more nearby SNPs and indels than the genomic average,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abyzov, Alexej, Li, Shantao, Kim, Daniel Rhee, Mohiyuddin, Marghoob, Stütz, Adrian M., Parrish, Nicholas F., Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine, Clark, Wyatt, Chen, Ken, Hurles, Matthew, Korbel, Jan O., Lam, Hugo Y. K., Lee, Charles, Gerstein, Mark B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8256
_version_ 1782374161399676928
author Abyzov, Alexej
Li, Shantao
Kim, Daniel Rhee
Mohiyuddin, Marghoob
Stütz, Adrian M.
Parrish, Nicholas F.
Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine
Clark, Wyatt
Chen, Ken
Hurles, Matthew
Korbel, Jan O.
Lam, Hugo Y. K.
Lee, Charles
Gerstein, Mark B.
author_facet Abyzov, Alexej
Li, Shantao
Kim, Daniel Rhee
Mohiyuddin, Marghoob
Stütz, Adrian M.
Parrish, Nicholas F.
Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine
Clark, Wyatt
Chen, Ken
Hurles, Matthew
Korbel, Jan O.
Lam, Hugo Y. K.
Lee, Charles
Gerstein, Mark B.
author_sort Abyzov, Alexej
collection PubMed
description Investigating genomic structural variants at basepair resolution is crucial for understanding their formation mechanisms. We identify and analyze 8,943 deletion breakpoints in 1,092 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project. We find breakpoints have more nearby SNPs and indels than the genomic average, likely a consequence of relaxed selection. By investigating the correlation of breakpoints with DNA methylation, Hi-C interactions, and histone marks and the substitution patterns of nucleotides near them, we find that breakpoints with the signature of non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) are associated with open chromatin. We hypothesize that some NAHR deletions occur without DNA replication and cell division, in embryonic and germline cells. In contrast, breakpoints associated with non-homologous (NH) mechanisms often have sequence micro-insertions, templated from later replicating genomic sites, spaced at two characteristic distances from the breakpoint. These micro-insertions are consistent with template-switching events and suggest a particular spatiotemporal configuration for DNA during the events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4451611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44516112015-12-01 Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms Abyzov, Alexej Li, Shantao Kim, Daniel Rhee Mohiyuddin, Marghoob Stütz, Adrian M. Parrish, Nicholas F. Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine Clark, Wyatt Chen, Ken Hurles, Matthew Korbel, Jan O. Lam, Hugo Y. K. Lee, Charles Gerstein, Mark B. Nat Commun Article Investigating genomic structural variants at basepair resolution is crucial for understanding their formation mechanisms. We identify and analyze 8,943 deletion breakpoints in 1,092 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project. We find breakpoints have more nearby SNPs and indels than the genomic average, likely a consequence of relaxed selection. By investigating the correlation of breakpoints with DNA methylation, Hi-C interactions, and histone marks and the substitution patterns of nucleotides near them, we find that breakpoints with the signature of non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) are associated with open chromatin. We hypothesize that some NAHR deletions occur without DNA replication and cell division, in embryonic and germline cells. In contrast, breakpoints associated with non-homologous (NH) mechanisms often have sequence micro-insertions, templated from later replicating genomic sites, spaced at two characteristic distances from the breakpoint. These micro-insertions are consistent with template-switching events and suggest a particular spatiotemporal configuration for DNA during the events. 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4451611/ /pubmed/26028266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8256 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Abyzov, Alexej
Li, Shantao
Kim, Daniel Rhee
Mohiyuddin, Marghoob
Stütz, Adrian M.
Parrish, Nicholas F.
Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine
Clark, Wyatt
Chen, Ken
Hurles, Matthew
Korbel, Jan O.
Lam, Hugo Y. K.
Lee, Charles
Gerstein, Mark B.
Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
title Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
title_full Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
title_fullStr Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
title_short Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
title_sort analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanisms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8256
work_keys_str_mv AT abyzovalexej analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT lishantao analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT kimdanielrhee analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT mohiyuddinmarghoob analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT stutzadrianm analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT parrishnicholasf analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT muxinmengjasmine analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT clarkwyatt analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT chenken analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT hurlesmatthew analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT korbeljano analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT lamhugoyk analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT leecharles analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms
AT gersteinmarkb analysisofdeletionbreakpointsfrom1092humansrevealsdetailsofmutationmechanisms