Cargando…

The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education

An assessment framework provides a structured conceptual map of the learning outcomes of a programme of study along with details of how achievement of the outcomes can be measured. The rationale for using frameworks to underpin the targeting of essential content components is especially relevant for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearce, Jacob, Edwards, Daniel, Fraillon, Julian, Coates, Hamish, Canny, Benedict J., Wilkinson, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0182-z
_version_ 1782374845987684352
author Pearce, Jacob
Edwards, Daniel
Fraillon, Julian
Coates, Hamish
Canny, Benedict J.
Wilkinson, David
author_facet Pearce, Jacob
Edwards, Daniel
Fraillon, Julian
Coates, Hamish
Canny, Benedict J.
Wilkinson, David
author_sort Pearce, Jacob
collection PubMed
description An assessment framework provides a structured conceptual map of the learning outcomes of a programme of study along with details of how achievement of the outcomes can be measured. The rationale for using frameworks to underpin the targeting of essential content components is especially relevant for the medical education community. Frameworks have the capacity to improve validity and reliability in assessment, allowing test developers to more easily create robust assessment instruments. The framework used by the Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration (AMAC) is an interesting and relevant case study for the international community as it draws and builds on established processes in higher education assessment. The AMAC experience offers an insight into important considerations for designing assessment frameworks and implementing frameworks in differing contexts. There are lessons which have the potential to improve assessment and reporting practice and quality in not only medical education, but in other domains of assessment. Prior to implementing any programme of assessment, the framework considerations outlined here will hopefully improve the quality of assessment and reporting practice by making implicit assumptions explicit, and allowing more critical reflection and evaluation throughout assessment processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4456467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44564672015-06-05 The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education Pearce, Jacob Edwards, Daniel Fraillon, Julian Coates, Hamish Canny, Benedict J. Wilkinson, David Perspect Med Educ Review Article An assessment framework provides a structured conceptual map of the learning outcomes of a programme of study along with details of how achievement of the outcomes can be measured. The rationale for using frameworks to underpin the targeting of essential content components is especially relevant for the medical education community. Frameworks have the capacity to improve validity and reliability in assessment, allowing test developers to more easily create robust assessment instruments. The framework used by the Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration (AMAC) is an interesting and relevant case study for the international community as it draws and builds on established processes in higher education assessment. The AMAC experience offers an insight into important considerations for designing assessment frameworks and implementing frameworks in differing contexts. There are lessons which have the potential to improve assessment and reporting practice and quality in not only medical education, but in other domains of assessment. Prior to implementing any programme of assessment, the framework considerations outlined here will hopefully improve the quality of assessment and reporting practice by making implicit assumptions explicit, and allowing more critical reflection and evaluation throughout assessment processes. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-05-12 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4456467/ /pubmed/25962966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0182-z Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Pearce, Jacob
Edwards, Daniel
Fraillon, Julian
Coates, Hamish
Canny, Benedict J.
Wilkinson, David
The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
title The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
title_full The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
title_fullStr The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
title_full_unstemmed The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
title_short The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
title_sort rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0182-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pearcejacob therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT edwardsdaniel therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT fraillonjulian therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT coateshamish therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT cannybenedictj therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT wilkinsondavid therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT pearcejacob rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT edwardsdaniel rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT fraillonjulian rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT coateshamish rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT cannybenedictj rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation
AT wilkinsondavid rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation