Cargando…
The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education
An assessment framework provides a structured conceptual map of the learning outcomes of a programme of study along with details of how achievement of the outcomes can be measured. The rationale for using frameworks to underpin the targeting of essential content components is especially relevant for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0182-z |
_version_ | 1782374845987684352 |
---|---|
author | Pearce, Jacob Edwards, Daniel Fraillon, Julian Coates, Hamish Canny, Benedict J. Wilkinson, David |
author_facet | Pearce, Jacob Edwards, Daniel Fraillon, Julian Coates, Hamish Canny, Benedict J. Wilkinson, David |
author_sort | Pearce, Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | An assessment framework provides a structured conceptual map of the learning outcomes of a programme of study along with details of how achievement of the outcomes can be measured. The rationale for using frameworks to underpin the targeting of essential content components is especially relevant for the medical education community. Frameworks have the capacity to improve validity and reliability in assessment, allowing test developers to more easily create robust assessment instruments. The framework used by the Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration (AMAC) is an interesting and relevant case study for the international community as it draws and builds on established processes in higher education assessment. The AMAC experience offers an insight into important considerations for designing assessment frameworks and implementing frameworks in differing contexts. There are lessons which have the potential to improve assessment and reporting practice and quality in not only medical education, but in other domains of assessment. Prior to implementing any programme of assessment, the framework considerations outlined here will hopefully improve the quality of assessment and reporting practice by making implicit assumptions explicit, and allowing more critical reflection and evaluation throughout assessment processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4456467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44564672015-06-05 The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education Pearce, Jacob Edwards, Daniel Fraillon, Julian Coates, Hamish Canny, Benedict J. Wilkinson, David Perspect Med Educ Review Article An assessment framework provides a structured conceptual map of the learning outcomes of a programme of study along with details of how achievement of the outcomes can be measured. The rationale for using frameworks to underpin the targeting of essential content components is especially relevant for the medical education community. Frameworks have the capacity to improve validity and reliability in assessment, allowing test developers to more easily create robust assessment instruments. The framework used by the Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration (AMAC) is an interesting and relevant case study for the international community as it draws and builds on established processes in higher education assessment. The AMAC experience offers an insight into important considerations for designing assessment frameworks and implementing frameworks in differing contexts. There are lessons which have the potential to improve assessment and reporting practice and quality in not only medical education, but in other domains of assessment. Prior to implementing any programme of assessment, the framework considerations outlined here will hopefully improve the quality of assessment and reporting practice by making implicit assumptions explicit, and allowing more critical reflection and evaluation throughout assessment processes. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-05-12 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4456467/ /pubmed/25962966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0182-z Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pearce, Jacob Edwards, Daniel Fraillon, Julian Coates, Hamish Canny, Benedict J. Wilkinson, David The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
title | The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
title_full | The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
title_fullStr | The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
title_full_unstemmed | The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
title_short | The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
title_sort | rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0182-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearcejacob therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT edwardsdaniel therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT fraillonjulian therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT coateshamish therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT cannybenedictj therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT wilkinsondavid therationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT pearcejacob rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT edwardsdaniel rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT fraillonjulian rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT coateshamish rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT cannybenedictj rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation AT wilkinsondavid rationaleforanduseofassessmentframeworksimprovingassessmentandreportingqualityinmedicaleducation |