Cargando…

Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy

INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yehia, Lamis, Boulos, Fouad, Jabbour, Mark, Mahfoud, Ziyad, Fakhruddin, Najla, El-Sabban, Marwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26046764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356
_version_ 1782375003205926912
author Yehia, Lamis
Boulos, Fouad
Jabbour, Mark
Mahfoud, Ziyad
Fakhruddin, Najla
El-Sabban, Marwan
author_facet Yehia, Lamis
Boulos, Fouad
Jabbour, Mark
Mahfoud, Ziyad
Fakhruddin, Najla
El-Sabban, Marwan
author_sort Yehia, Lamis
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated under hypoxia and its expression is associated with induction of angiogenesis resulting in proliferation, aggressive tumor phenotype and metastasis. In this study we evaluate the potential use of HIF-1α as aTNBC-specific marker. METHODS: 62 TNBC, 64 HER2(+), and 64 hormone-receptors positive breast cancer cases were evaluated for central fibrosis and necrosis, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, VEGFR3, CD31 expression and microvessel density. RNA extraction from paraffin-embedded samples, followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) evaluation of HIF-1α and VEGF transcripts was performed on 54 cases (18 from each subtype). RESULTS: HIF-1α protein was expressed in 35.5% TNBC, 45.3% HER2(+)and 25.0% ER(+)/PR(+) (p = 0.055; χ(2) test). PCRanalysis of subgroup of breast cancers, 84.2% expressed HIF-1α protein and its transcripts, while only 66.7% expressed VEGF transcripts simultaneously with the HIF-1α protein and its transcripts. Central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in TNBC (p = 0.015; χ(2) test), while MVD was comparable among all groups (p = 0.928; χ(2) test). VEGFR3 was highest in TNBC expressing HIF-1α. HIF-1β protein was expressed in 32.0% of HIF-1α(+), and in (44.3%) of HIF-1α(-) breast cancer cases (p = 0.033; χ(2) test). Moreover, HIF-1α expression in cases with central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in the HER2(+) followed by the TNBC (p = 0.156; χ(2 )test). CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of TNBC express HIF-1α but not in a significantly different manner from other breast cancer subtypes. The potential of anti-HIF-1α targeted therapy is therefore not a candidate for exclusive use in TNBC, but should be considered in all breast cancers, especially in the setting of clinically aggressive or refractory disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4457831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44578312015-06-09 Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy Yehia, Lamis Boulos, Fouad Jabbour, Mark Mahfoud, Ziyad Fakhruddin, Najla El-Sabban, Marwan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated under hypoxia and its expression is associated with induction of angiogenesis resulting in proliferation, aggressive tumor phenotype and metastasis. In this study we evaluate the potential use of HIF-1α as aTNBC-specific marker. METHODS: 62 TNBC, 64 HER2(+), and 64 hormone-receptors positive breast cancer cases were evaluated for central fibrosis and necrosis, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, VEGFR3, CD31 expression and microvessel density. RNA extraction from paraffin-embedded samples, followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) evaluation of HIF-1α and VEGF transcripts was performed on 54 cases (18 from each subtype). RESULTS: HIF-1α protein was expressed in 35.5% TNBC, 45.3% HER2(+)and 25.0% ER(+)/PR(+) (p = 0.055; χ(2) test). PCRanalysis of subgroup of breast cancers, 84.2% expressed HIF-1α protein and its transcripts, while only 66.7% expressed VEGF transcripts simultaneously with the HIF-1α protein and its transcripts. Central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in TNBC (p = 0.015; χ(2) test), while MVD was comparable among all groups (p = 0.928; χ(2) test). VEGFR3 was highest in TNBC expressing HIF-1α. HIF-1β protein was expressed in 32.0% of HIF-1α(+), and in (44.3%) of HIF-1α(-) breast cancer cases (p = 0.033; χ(2) test). Moreover, HIF-1α expression in cases with central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in the HER2(+) followed by the TNBC (p = 0.156; χ(2 )test). CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of TNBC express HIF-1α but not in a significantly different manner from other breast cancer subtypes. The potential of anti-HIF-1α targeted therapy is therefore not a candidate for exclusive use in TNBC, but should be considered in all breast cancers, especially in the setting of clinically aggressive or refractory disease. Public Library of Science 2015-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4457831/ /pubmed/26046764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356 Text en © 2015 Yehia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yehia, Lamis
Boulos, Fouad
Jabbour, Mark
Mahfoud, Ziyad
Fakhruddin, Najla
El-Sabban, Marwan
Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
title Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
title_full Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
title_fullStr Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
title_short Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
title_sort expression of hif-1α and markers of angiogenesis are not significantly different in triple negative breast cancer compared to other breast cancer molecular subtypes: implications for future therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26046764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356
work_keys_str_mv AT yehialamis expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy
AT boulosfouad expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy
AT jabbourmark expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy
AT mahfoudziyad expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy
AT fakhruddinnajla expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy
AT elsabbanmarwan expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy