Cargando…
Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy
INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26046764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356 |
_version_ | 1782375003205926912 |
---|---|
author | Yehia, Lamis Boulos, Fouad Jabbour, Mark Mahfoud, Ziyad Fakhruddin, Najla El-Sabban, Marwan |
author_facet | Yehia, Lamis Boulos, Fouad Jabbour, Mark Mahfoud, Ziyad Fakhruddin, Najla El-Sabban, Marwan |
author_sort | Yehia, Lamis |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated under hypoxia and its expression is associated with induction of angiogenesis resulting in proliferation, aggressive tumor phenotype and metastasis. In this study we evaluate the potential use of HIF-1α as aTNBC-specific marker. METHODS: 62 TNBC, 64 HER2(+), and 64 hormone-receptors positive breast cancer cases were evaluated for central fibrosis and necrosis, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, VEGFR3, CD31 expression and microvessel density. RNA extraction from paraffin-embedded samples, followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) evaluation of HIF-1α and VEGF transcripts was performed on 54 cases (18 from each subtype). RESULTS: HIF-1α protein was expressed in 35.5% TNBC, 45.3% HER2(+)and 25.0% ER(+)/PR(+) (p = 0.055; χ(2) test). PCRanalysis of subgroup of breast cancers, 84.2% expressed HIF-1α protein and its transcripts, while only 66.7% expressed VEGF transcripts simultaneously with the HIF-1α protein and its transcripts. Central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in TNBC (p = 0.015; χ(2) test), while MVD was comparable among all groups (p = 0.928; χ(2) test). VEGFR3 was highest in TNBC expressing HIF-1α. HIF-1β protein was expressed in 32.0% of HIF-1α(+), and in (44.3%) of HIF-1α(-) breast cancer cases (p = 0.033; χ(2) test). Moreover, HIF-1α expression in cases with central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in the HER2(+) followed by the TNBC (p = 0.156; χ(2 )test). CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of TNBC express HIF-1α but not in a significantly different manner from other breast cancer subtypes. The potential of anti-HIF-1α targeted therapy is therefore not a candidate for exclusive use in TNBC, but should be considered in all breast cancers, especially in the setting of clinically aggressive or refractory disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4457831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44578312015-06-09 Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy Yehia, Lamis Boulos, Fouad Jabbour, Mark Mahfoud, Ziyad Fakhruddin, Najla El-Sabban, Marwan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated under hypoxia and its expression is associated with induction of angiogenesis resulting in proliferation, aggressive tumor phenotype and metastasis. In this study we evaluate the potential use of HIF-1α as aTNBC-specific marker. METHODS: 62 TNBC, 64 HER2(+), and 64 hormone-receptors positive breast cancer cases were evaluated for central fibrosis and necrosis, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, VEGFR3, CD31 expression and microvessel density. RNA extraction from paraffin-embedded samples, followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) evaluation of HIF-1α and VEGF transcripts was performed on 54 cases (18 from each subtype). RESULTS: HIF-1α protein was expressed in 35.5% TNBC, 45.3% HER2(+)and 25.0% ER(+)/PR(+) (p = 0.055; χ(2) test). PCRanalysis of subgroup of breast cancers, 84.2% expressed HIF-1α protein and its transcripts, while only 66.7% expressed VEGF transcripts simultaneously with the HIF-1α protein and its transcripts. Central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in TNBC (p = 0.015; χ(2) test), while MVD was comparable among all groups (p = 0.928; χ(2) test). VEGFR3 was highest in TNBC expressing HIF-1α. HIF-1β protein was expressed in 32.0% of HIF-1α(+), and in (44.3%) of HIF-1α(-) breast cancer cases (p = 0.033; χ(2) test). Moreover, HIF-1α expression in cases with central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in the HER2(+) followed by the TNBC (p = 0.156; χ(2 )test). CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of TNBC express HIF-1α but not in a significantly different manner from other breast cancer subtypes. The potential of anti-HIF-1α targeted therapy is therefore not a candidate for exclusive use in TNBC, but should be considered in all breast cancers, especially in the setting of clinically aggressive or refractory disease. Public Library of Science 2015-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4457831/ /pubmed/26046764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356 Text en © 2015 Yehia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yehia, Lamis Boulos, Fouad Jabbour, Mark Mahfoud, Ziyad Fakhruddin, Najla El-Sabban, Marwan Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy |
title | Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy |
title_full | Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy |
title_fullStr | Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy |
title_short | Expression of HIF-1α and Markers of Angiogenesis Are Not Significantly Different in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Compared to Other Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Future Therapy |
title_sort | expression of hif-1α and markers of angiogenesis are not significantly different in triple negative breast cancer compared to other breast cancer molecular subtypes: implications for future therapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26046764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yehialamis expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy AT boulosfouad expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy AT jabbourmark expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy AT mahfoudziyad expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy AT fakhruddinnajla expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy AT elsabbanmarwan expressionofhif1aandmarkersofangiogenesisarenotsignificantlydifferentintriplenegativebreastcancercomparedtootherbreastcancermolecularsubtypesimplicationsforfuturetherapy |