Cargando…

Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off

BACKGROUND: Comparative analysis of homologous sequences enables the understanding of evolutionary patterns at the molecular level, unraveling the functional constraints that shaped the underlying genes. Bioinformatic pipelines for comparative sequence analysis typically include procedures for (i) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutheil, Julien Y, Figuet, Emeric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8
_version_ 1782375254565322752
author Dutheil, Julien Y
Figuet, Emeric
author_facet Dutheil, Julien Y
Figuet, Emeric
author_sort Dutheil, Julien Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparative analysis of homologous sequences enables the understanding of evolutionary patterns at the molecular level, unraveling the functional constraints that shaped the underlying genes. Bioinformatic pipelines for comparative sequence analysis typically include procedures for (i) alignment quality assessment and (ii) control of sequence redundancy. An additional, underassessed step is the control of the amount and distribution of missing data in sequence alignments. While the number of sequences available for a given gene typically increases with time, the site-specific coverage of each alignment position remains highly variable because of differences in sequencing and annotation quality, or simply because of biological variation. For any given alignment-based analysis, the selection of sequences thus defines a trade-off between the species representation and the quantity of sites with sufficient coverage to be included in the subsequent analyses. RESULTS: We introduce an algorithm for the optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off. The algorithm uses a guide tree to compute scores for each bipartition of the alignment, allowing the recursive selection of sequence subsets with optimal combinations of sequence and site numbers. By applying our methods to two large data sets of several thousands of gene families, we show that significant site-specific coverage increases can be achieved while controlling for the species representation. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm introduced in this work allows the control of the distribution of missing data in any sequence alignment by removing sequences to increase the number of sites with a defined minimum coverage. We advocate that our missing data optimization procedure in an important step which should be considered in comparative analysis pipelines, together with alignment quality assessment and control of sampled diversity. An open source C++ implementation is available at http://bioweb.me/physamp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4459672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44596722015-06-09 Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off Dutheil, Julien Y Figuet, Emeric BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Comparative analysis of homologous sequences enables the understanding of evolutionary patterns at the molecular level, unraveling the functional constraints that shaped the underlying genes. Bioinformatic pipelines for comparative sequence analysis typically include procedures for (i) alignment quality assessment and (ii) control of sequence redundancy. An additional, underassessed step is the control of the amount and distribution of missing data in sequence alignments. While the number of sequences available for a given gene typically increases with time, the site-specific coverage of each alignment position remains highly variable because of differences in sequencing and annotation quality, or simply because of biological variation. For any given alignment-based analysis, the selection of sequences thus defines a trade-off between the species representation and the quantity of sites with sufficient coverage to be included in the subsequent analyses. RESULTS: We introduce an algorithm for the optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off. The algorithm uses a guide tree to compute scores for each bipartition of the alignment, allowing the recursive selection of sequence subsets with optimal combinations of sequence and site numbers. By applying our methods to two large data sets of several thousands of gene families, we show that significant site-specific coverage increases can be achieved while controlling for the species representation. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm introduced in this work allows the control of the distribution of missing data in any sequence alignment by removing sequences to increase the number of sites with a defined minimum coverage. We advocate that our missing data optimization procedure in an important step which should be considered in comparative analysis pipelines, together with alignment quality assessment and control of sampled diversity. An open source C++ implementation is available at http://bioweb.me/physamp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4459672/ /pubmed/26055961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8 Text en © Dutheil and Figuet; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Dutheil, Julien Y
Figuet, Emeric
Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
title Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
title_full Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
title_fullStr Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
title_short Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
title_sort optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dutheiljulieny optimizationofsequencealignmentsaccordingtothenumberofsequencesvsnumberofsitestradeoff
AT figuetemeric optimizationofsequencealignmentsaccordingtothenumberofsequencesvsnumberofsitestradeoff