Cargando…
Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off
BACKGROUND: Comparative analysis of homologous sequences enables the understanding of evolutionary patterns at the molecular level, unraveling the functional constraints that shaped the underlying genes. Bioinformatic pipelines for comparative sequence analysis typically include procedures for (i) a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8 |
_version_ | 1782375254565322752 |
---|---|
author | Dutheil, Julien Y Figuet, Emeric |
author_facet | Dutheil, Julien Y Figuet, Emeric |
author_sort | Dutheil, Julien Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparative analysis of homologous sequences enables the understanding of evolutionary patterns at the molecular level, unraveling the functional constraints that shaped the underlying genes. Bioinformatic pipelines for comparative sequence analysis typically include procedures for (i) alignment quality assessment and (ii) control of sequence redundancy. An additional, underassessed step is the control of the amount and distribution of missing data in sequence alignments. While the number of sequences available for a given gene typically increases with time, the site-specific coverage of each alignment position remains highly variable because of differences in sequencing and annotation quality, or simply because of biological variation. For any given alignment-based analysis, the selection of sequences thus defines a trade-off between the species representation and the quantity of sites with sufficient coverage to be included in the subsequent analyses. RESULTS: We introduce an algorithm for the optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off. The algorithm uses a guide tree to compute scores for each bipartition of the alignment, allowing the recursive selection of sequence subsets with optimal combinations of sequence and site numbers. By applying our methods to two large data sets of several thousands of gene families, we show that significant site-specific coverage increases can be achieved while controlling for the species representation. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm introduced in this work allows the control of the distribution of missing data in any sequence alignment by removing sequences to increase the number of sites with a defined minimum coverage. We advocate that our missing data optimization procedure in an important step which should be considered in comparative analysis pipelines, together with alignment quality assessment and control of sampled diversity. An open source C++ implementation is available at http://bioweb.me/physamp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4459672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44596722015-06-09 Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off Dutheil, Julien Y Figuet, Emeric BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Comparative analysis of homologous sequences enables the understanding of evolutionary patterns at the molecular level, unraveling the functional constraints that shaped the underlying genes. Bioinformatic pipelines for comparative sequence analysis typically include procedures for (i) alignment quality assessment and (ii) control of sequence redundancy. An additional, underassessed step is the control of the amount and distribution of missing data in sequence alignments. While the number of sequences available for a given gene typically increases with time, the site-specific coverage of each alignment position remains highly variable because of differences in sequencing and annotation quality, or simply because of biological variation. For any given alignment-based analysis, the selection of sequences thus defines a trade-off between the species representation and the quantity of sites with sufficient coverage to be included in the subsequent analyses. RESULTS: We introduce an algorithm for the optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off. The algorithm uses a guide tree to compute scores for each bipartition of the alignment, allowing the recursive selection of sequence subsets with optimal combinations of sequence and site numbers. By applying our methods to two large data sets of several thousands of gene families, we show that significant site-specific coverage increases can be achieved while controlling for the species representation. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm introduced in this work allows the control of the distribution of missing data in any sequence alignment by removing sequences to increase the number of sites with a defined minimum coverage. We advocate that our missing data optimization procedure in an important step which should be considered in comparative analysis pipelines, together with alignment quality assessment and control of sampled diversity. An open source C++ implementation is available at http://bioweb.me/physamp. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4459672/ /pubmed/26055961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8 Text en © Dutheil and Figuet; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Dutheil, Julien Y Figuet, Emeric Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
title | Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
title_full | Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
title_fullStr | Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
title_short | Optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
title_sort | optimization of sequence alignments according to the number of sequences vs. number of sites trade-off |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0619-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dutheiljulieny optimizationofsequencealignmentsaccordingtothenumberofsequencesvsnumberofsitestradeoff AT figuetemeric optimizationofsequencealignmentsaccordingtothenumberofsequencesvsnumberofsitestradeoff |