Cargando…

Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results

BACKGROUND: Until recently, students at UMC Utrecht Faculty of Medicine prepared for practical skills training sessions by studying recommended literature and making written assignments, which was considered unsatisfactory. Therefore, mandatory e-modules were gradually introduced as substitute for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwant, Kelly J., Custers, Eugene J. F. M., Jongen-Hermus, Femke J., Kluijtmans, Manon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0376-4
_version_ 1782376548793319424
author Kwant, Kelly J.
Custers, Eugene J. F. M.
Jongen-Hermus, Femke J.
Kluijtmans, Manon
author_facet Kwant, Kelly J.
Custers, Eugene J. F. M.
Jongen-Hermus, Femke J.
Kluijtmans, Manon
author_sort Kwant, Kelly J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Until recently, students at UMC Utrecht Faculty of Medicine prepared for practical skills training sessions by studying recommended literature and making written assignments, which was considered unsatisfactory. Therefore, mandatory e-modules were gradually introduced as substitute for the text based preparation. This study aimed to investigate whether this innovation improved students’ performance on the practical skills (OSCE) examination. METHOD: In both the 2012 and 2013 OSCEs, e-modules were available for some skill stations whereas others still had text based preparation. We compared students’ performance, both within and between cohorts, for skill stations which had e-module preparation versus skill stations with text based preparation. RESULTS: We found that performance on skill stations for which students had prepared by e-modules was significantly higher than on stations with text based preparation, both within and between cohorts. This improvement cannot be explained by overall differences between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our results show that results of skills training can be improved, by the introduction of e-modules without increasing teacher time. Further research is needed to answer the question whether the improved performance is due to the content of the e-modules of to their obligatory character.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44688092015-06-17 Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results Kwant, Kelly J. Custers, Eugene J. F. M. Jongen-Hermus, Femke J. Kluijtmans, Manon BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Until recently, students at UMC Utrecht Faculty of Medicine prepared for practical skills training sessions by studying recommended literature and making written assignments, which was considered unsatisfactory. Therefore, mandatory e-modules were gradually introduced as substitute for the text based preparation. This study aimed to investigate whether this innovation improved students’ performance on the practical skills (OSCE) examination. METHOD: In both the 2012 and 2013 OSCEs, e-modules were available for some skill stations whereas others still had text based preparation. We compared students’ performance, both within and between cohorts, for skill stations which had e-module preparation versus skill stations with text based preparation. RESULTS: We found that performance on skill stations for which students had prepared by e-modules was significantly higher than on stations with text based preparation, both within and between cohorts. This improvement cannot be explained by overall differences between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our results show that results of skills training can be improved, by the introduction of e-modules without increasing teacher time. Further research is needed to answer the question whether the improved performance is due to the content of the e-modules of to their obligatory character. BioMed Central 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4468809/ /pubmed/26058347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0376-4 Text en © Kwant et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kwant, Kelly J.
Custers, Eugene J. F. M.
Jongen-Hermus, Femke J.
Kluijtmans, Manon
Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
title Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
title_full Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
title_fullStr Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
title_full_unstemmed Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
title_short Preparation by mandatory E-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
title_sort preparation by mandatory e-modules improves learning of practical skills: a quasi-experimental comparison of skill examination results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0376-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kwantkellyj preparationbymandatoryemodulesimproveslearningofpracticalskillsaquasiexperimentalcomparisonofskillexaminationresults
AT custerseugenejfm preparationbymandatoryemodulesimproveslearningofpracticalskillsaquasiexperimentalcomparisonofskillexaminationresults
AT jongenhermusfemkej preparationbymandatoryemodulesimproveslearningofpracticalskillsaquasiexperimentalcomparisonofskillexaminationresults
AT kluijtmansmanon preparationbymandatoryemodulesimproveslearningofpracticalskillsaquasiexperimentalcomparisonofskillexaminationresults