Cargando…

RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis

The presence or absence of Mad1 at kinetochores is a major determinant of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity, the surveillance mechanism that delays anaphase onset if one or more kinetochores remain unattached to spindle fibers. Among the factors regulating the levels of Mad1 at kinetochores...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Défachelles, Lénaïg, Raich, Natacha, Terracol, Régine, Baudin, Xavier, Williams, Byron, Goldberg, Michael, Karess, Roger E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25772408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9472-x
_version_ 1782376586502209536
author Défachelles, Lénaïg
Raich, Natacha
Terracol, Régine
Baudin, Xavier
Williams, Byron
Goldberg, Michael
Karess, Roger E.
author_facet Défachelles, Lénaïg
Raich, Natacha
Terracol, Régine
Baudin, Xavier
Williams, Byron
Goldberg, Michael
Karess, Roger E.
author_sort Défachelles, Lénaïg
collection PubMed
description The presence or absence of Mad1 at kinetochores is a major determinant of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity, the surveillance mechanism that delays anaphase onset if one or more kinetochores remain unattached to spindle fibers. Among the factors regulating the levels of Mad1 at kinetochores is the Rod, Zw10, and Zwilch (RZZ) complex, which is required for Mad1 recruitment through a mechanism that remains unknown. The relative dynamics and interactions of Mad1 and RZZ at kinetochores have not been extensively investigated, although Mad1 has been reported to be stably recruited to unattached kinetochores. In this study, we directly compare Mad1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) turnover dynamics on unattached Drosophila kinetochores with that of RZZ, tagged either with GFP-Rod or GFP-Zw10. We find that nearly 40 % of kinetochore-bound Mad1 has a significant dynamic component, turning over with a half-life of 12 s. RZZ in contrast is essentially stable on unattached kinetochores. In addition, we report that a fraction of RZZ and Mad1 can co-immunoprecipitate, indicating that the genetically determined recruitment hierarchy (in which Mad1 depends on RZZ) may reflect a physical association of the two complexes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10577-015-9472-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4469085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44690852015-06-17 RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis Défachelles, Lénaïg Raich, Natacha Terracol, Régine Baudin, Xavier Williams, Byron Goldberg, Michael Karess, Roger E. Chromosome Res Article The presence or absence of Mad1 at kinetochores is a major determinant of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity, the surveillance mechanism that delays anaphase onset if one or more kinetochores remain unattached to spindle fibers. Among the factors regulating the levels of Mad1 at kinetochores is the Rod, Zw10, and Zwilch (RZZ) complex, which is required for Mad1 recruitment through a mechanism that remains unknown. The relative dynamics and interactions of Mad1 and RZZ at kinetochores have not been extensively investigated, although Mad1 has been reported to be stably recruited to unattached kinetochores. In this study, we directly compare Mad1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) turnover dynamics on unattached Drosophila kinetochores with that of RZZ, tagged either with GFP-Rod or GFP-Zw10. We find that nearly 40 % of kinetochore-bound Mad1 has a significant dynamic component, turning over with a half-life of 12 s. RZZ in contrast is essentially stable on unattached kinetochores. In addition, we report that a fraction of RZZ and Mad1 can co-immunoprecipitate, indicating that the genetically determined recruitment hierarchy (in which Mad1 depends on RZZ) may reflect a physical association of the two complexes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10577-015-9472-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2015-03-14 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4469085/ /pubmed/25772408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9472-x Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015
spellingShingle Article
Défachelles, Lénaïg
Raich, Natacha
Terracol, Régine
Baudin, Xavier
Williams, Byron
Goldberg, Michael
Karess, Roger E.
RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
title RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
title_full RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
title_fullStr RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
title_full_unstemmed RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
title_short RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
title_sort rzz and mad1 dynamics in drosophila mitosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25772408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-015-9472-x
work_keys_str_mv AT defachelleslenaig rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis
AT raichnatacha rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis
AT terracolregine rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis
AT baudinxavier rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis
AT williamsbyron rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis
AT goldbergmichael rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis
AT karessrogere rzzandmad1dynamicsindrosophilamitosis