Cargando…
Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology
Allergic reactions to peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Ara h) are caused by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated sensitizations to various proteins. The stability and relative proportion of these proteins in peanut determine the risk of hazardous reactions. Hazardous sensitization to seed storage proteins [S2 a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Urban & Vogel
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-014-0019-z |
_version_ | 1782378007043768320 |
---|---|
author | Lange, Lars Beyer, Kirsten Kleine-Tebbe, Jörg |
author_facet | Lange, Lars Beyer, Kirsten Kleine-Tebbe, Jörg |
author_sort | Lange, Lars |
collection | PubMed |
description | Allergic reactions to peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Ara h) are caused by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated sensitizations to various proteins. The stability and relative proportion of these proteins in peanut determine the risk of hazardous reactions. Hazardous sensitization to seed storage proteins [S2 albumins (Ara h 2, 6 and 7) > other seed storage proteins (Ara 1 and 3) > oleosins (Ara h 10 and 11)] are distinct from sensitizations to lipid transfer protein (Ara h 9) with moderate risk or cross-sensitizations to Bet v 1-homologous PR-10 protein (Ara h 8) and to profilin (Ara h 5) with low risk. A specific IgE test, e.g. to Ara h 2 in the case of suspected systemic reaction, or where this should be ruled out, can facilitate easier risk assessment. Results, however, are only relevant in the presence of corresponding clinical symptoms. IgE sensitization to peanut extract without hazardous reactions is often caused in this part of the world by Bet v 1-related cross reactions (in birch pollen allergy sufferers), cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) or profilin sensitizations. In the case of doubt, clinical relevance can only be established by means of oral challenge, particularly since not all peanut allergens (e. g., oleosins) are available as yet for diagnostic purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4479434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Urban & Vogel |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44794342015-06-26 Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology Lange, Lars Beyer, Kirsten Kleine-Tebbe, Jörg Allergo J Int Review Article Allergic reactions to peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Ara h) are caused by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated sensitizations to various proteins. The stability and relative proportion of these proteins in peanut determine the risk of hazardous reactions. Hazardous sensitization to seed storage proteins [S2 albumins (Ara h 2, 6 and 7) > other seed storage proteins (Ara 1 and 3) > oleosins (Ara h 10 and 11)] are distinct from sensitizations to lipid transfer protein (Ara h 9) with moderate risk or cross-sensitizations to Bet v 1-homologous PR-10 protein (Ara h 8) and to profilin (Ara h 5) with low risk. A specific IgE test, e.g. to Ara h 2 in the case of suspected systemic reaction, or where this should be ruled out, can facilitate easier risk assessment. Results, however, are only relevant in the presence of corresponding clinical symptoms. IgE sensitization to peanut extract without hazardous reactions is often caused in this part of the world by Bet v 1-related cross reactions (in birch pollen allergy sufferers), cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) or profilin sensitizations. In the case of doubt, clinical relevance can only be established by means of oral challenge, particularly since not all peanut allergens (e. g., oleosins) are available as yet for diagnostic purposes. Urban & Vogel 2014-08-07 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4479434/ /pubmed/26120527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-014-0019-z Text en © Urban & Vogel 2014 |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lange, Lars Beyer, Kirsten Kleine-Tebbe, Jörg Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology |
title | Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology |
title_full | Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology |
title_fullStr | Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology |
title_short | Benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: Part 14 of the series Molecular Allergology |
title_sort | benefits and limitations of molecular diagnostics in peanut allergy: part 14 of the series molecular allergology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-014-0019-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langelars benefitsandlimitationsofmoleculardiagnosticsinpeanutallergypart14oftheseriesmolecularallergology AT beyerkirsten benefitsandlimitationsofmoleculardiagnosticsinpeanutallergypart14oftheseriesmolecularallergology AT kleinetebbejorg benefitsandlimitationsofmoleculardiagnosticsinpeanutallergypart14oftheseriesmolecularallergology |