Cargando…
Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P(1) receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0095-7 |
_version_ | 1782379112205123584 |
---|---|
author | Juif, Pierre-Eric Hoch, Matthias D’Ambrosio, Daniele Dingemanse, Jasper |
author_facet | Juif, Pierre-Eric Hoch, Matthias D’Ambrosio, Daniele Dingemanse, Jasper |
author_sort | Juif, Pierre-Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P(1) receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatment of autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of two polymorphic forms of ponesimod in capsules (Form A versus Form C; Study 1) and the relative bioavailability of a capsule formulation and a tablet formulation (both polymorphic Form C; Study 2). METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects were performed. In Study 1, 12 male subjects received a single dose of 20 mg of polymorphic Form A or Form C of ponesimod in a capsule. In Study 2, 14 male and female subjects (ratio 1:1) received a single dose of 40 mg of polymorphic Form C of ponesimod in either a capsule or a tablet formulation. Pharmacokinetic and safety variables (clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, and an electrocardiogram) were assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the exposure to ponesimod following administration of the formulations in Study 1 showed that the 90 % confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0–inf)), the area under the curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC(0–t)), the terminal half-life (t(½)), and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were all within the 0.80–1.25 bioequivalence interval. In Study 2, more rapid absorption of ponesimod was observed from the tablet formulation than from the capsule formulation. There were no relevant differences in the safety and tolerability profiles between the different formulations. CONCLUSION: The two polymorphic forms of ponesimod and tablet versus capsule formulations were similar in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4488184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44881842015-07-02 Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects Juif, Pierre-Eric Hoch, Matthias D’Ambrosio, Daniele Dingemanse, Jasper Drugs R D Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P(1) receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatment of autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of two polymorphic forms of ponesimod in capsules (Form A versus Form C; Study 1) and the relative bioavailability of a capsule formulation and a tablet formulation (both polymorphic Form C; Study 2). METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects were performed. In Study 1, 12 male subjects received a single dose of 20 mg of polymorphic Form A or Form C of ponesimod in a capsule. In Study 2, 14 male and female subjects (ratio 1:1) received a single dose of 40 mg of polymorphic Form C of ponesimod in either a capsule or a tablet formulation. Pharmacokinetic and safety variables (clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, and an electrocardiogram) were assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the exposure to ponesimod following administration of the formulations in Study 1 showed that the 90 % confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0–inf)), the area under the curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC(0–t)), the terminal half-life (t(½)), and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were all within the 0.80–1.25 bioequivalence interval. In Study 2, more rapid absorption of ponesimod was observed from the tablet formulation than from the capsule formulation. There were no relevant differences in the safety and tolerability profiles between the different formulations. CONCLUSION: The two polymorphic forms of ponesimod and tablet versus capsule formulations were similar in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. Springer International Publishing 2015-05-05 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4488184/ /pubmed/25939333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0095-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Juif, Pierre-Eric Hoch, Matthias D’Ambrosio, Daniele Dingemanse, Jasper Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects |
title | Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects |
title_full | Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects |
title_fullStr | Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects |
title_short | Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects |
title_sort | biocomparison of three formulations of the s1p(1) receptor modulator ponesimod in healthy subjects |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0095-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juifpierreeric biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects AT hochmatthias biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects AT dambrosiodaniele biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects AT dingemansejasper biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects |