Cargando…

Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P(1) receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juif, Pierre-Eric, Hoch, Matthias, D’Ambrosio, Daniele, Dingemanse, Jasper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0095-7
_version_ 1782379112205123584
author Juif, Pierre-Eric
Hoch, Matthias
D’Ambrosio, Daniele
Dingemanse, Jasper
author_facet Juif, Pierre-Eric
Hoch, Matthias
D’Ambrosio, Daniele
Dingemanse, Jasper
author_sort Juif, Pierre-Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P(1) receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatment of autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of two polymorphic forms of ponesimod in capsules (Form A versus Form C; Study 1) and the relative bioavailability of a capsule formulation and a tablet formulation (both polymorphic Form C; Study 2). METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects were performed. In Study 1, 12 male subjects received a single dose of 20 mg of polymorphic Form A or Form C of ponesimod in a capsule. In Study 2, 14 male and female subjects (ratio 1:1) received a single dose of 40 mg of polymorphic Form C of ponesimod in either a capsule or a tablet formulation. Pharmacokinetic and safety variables (clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, and an electrocardiogram) were assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the exposure to ponesimod following administration of the formulations in Study 1 showed that the 90 % confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0–inf)), the area under the curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC(0–t)), the terminal half-life (t(½)), and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were all within the 0.80–1.25 bioequivalence interval. In Study 2, more rapid absorption of ponesimod was observed from the tablet formulation than from the capsule formulation. There were no relevant differences in the safety and tolerability profiles between the different formulations. CONCLUSION: The two polymorphic forms of ponesimod and tablet versus capsule formulations were similar in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4488184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44881842015-07-02 Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects Juif, Pierre-Eric Hoch, Matthias D’Ambrosio, Daniele Dingemanse, Jasper Drugs R D Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P(1) receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatment of autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of two polymorphic forms of ponesimod in capsules (Form A versus Form C; Study 1) and the relative bioavailability of a capsule formulation and a tablet formulation (both polymorphic Form C; Study 2). METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects were performed. In Study 1, 12 male subjects received a single dose of 20 mg of polymorphic Form A or Form C of ponesimod in a capsule. In Study 2, 14 male and female subjects (ratio 1:1) received a single dose of 40 mg of polymorphic Form C of ponesimod in either a capsule or a tablet formulation. Pharmacokinetic and safety variables (clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, and an electrocardiogram) were assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the exposure to ponesimod following administration of the formulations in Study 1 showed that the 90 % confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0–inf)), the area under the curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC(0–t)), the terminal half-life (t(½)), and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were all within the 0.80–1.25 bioequivalence interval. In Study 2, more rapid absorption of ponesimod was observed from the tablet formulation than from the capsule formulation. There were no relevant differences in the safety and tolerability profiles between the different formulations. CONCLUSION: The two polymorphic forms of ponesimod and tablet versus capsule formulations were similar in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. Springer International Publishing 2015-05-05 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4488184/ /pubmed/25939333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0095-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Juif, Pierre-Eric
Hoch, Matthias
D’Ambrosio, Daniele
Dingemanse, Jasper
Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
title Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
title_full Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
title_fullStr Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
title_short Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects
title_sort biocomparison of three formulations of the s1p(1) receptor modulator ponesimod in healthy subjects
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4488184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0095-7
work_keys_str_mv AT juifpierreeric biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects
AT hochmatthias biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects
AT dambrosiodaniele biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects
AT dingemansejasper biocomparisonofthreeformulationsofthes1p1receptormodulatorponesimodinhealthysubjects