Cargando…

Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment

We observed the dynamic recruitment of spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Bub1 to detached kinetochores in budding yeast using real-time live-cell imaging and quantified recruitment in fixed cells. After induced de novo kinetochore assembly at one pair of sister centromeres, Mad1 appeared after th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krefman, Nathaniel I., Drubin, David G., Barnes, Georjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0276
_version_ 1782381058087452672
author Krefman, Nathaniel I.
Drubin, David G.
Barnes, Georjana
author_facet Krefman, Nathaniel I.
Drubin, David G.
Barnes, Georjana
author_sort Krefman, Nathaniel I.
collection PubMed
description We observed the dynamic recruitment of spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Bub1 to detached kinetochores in budding yeast using real-time live-cell imaging and quantified recruitment in fixed cells. After induced de novo kinetochore assembly at one pair of sister centromeres, Mad1 appeared after the kinetochore protein Mtw1. Detached kinetochores were not associated with the nuclear envelope, so Mad1 does not anchor them to nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Disrupting Mad1's NPC localization increased Mad1 recruitment to detached sister kinetochores. Conversely, increasing the number of detached kinetochores reduced the amount of Mad1 per detached kinetochore. Bub1 also relocalized completely from the spindle to detached sister centromeres after kinetochore assembly. After their capture by microtubules, Mad1 and Bub1 progressively disappeared from kinetochores. Sister chromatids that arrested with a lateral attachment to one microtubule exhibited half the Mad1 of fully detached sisters. We propose that detached kinetochores compete with alternate binding sites in the nucleus to recruit Mad1 and Bub1 from available pools that are small enough to be fully depleted by just one pair of detached kinetochores and that lateral attachment licenses Mad1 removal from kinetochores after a kinetic delay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45013602015-09-30 Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment Krefman, Nathaniel I. Drubin, David G. Barnes, Georjana Mol Biol Cell Articles We observed the dynamic recruitment of spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Bub1 to detached kinetochores in budding yeast using real-time live-cell imaging and quantified recruitment in fixed cells. After induced de novo kinetochore assembly at one pair of sister centromeres, Mad1 appeared after the kinetochore protein Mtw1. Detached kinetochores were not associated with the nuclear envelope, so Mad1 does not anchor them to nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Disrupting Mad1's NPC localization increased Mad1 recruitment to detached sister kinetochores. Conversely, increasing the number of detached kinetochores reduced the amount of Mad1 per detached kinetochore. Bub1 also relocalized completely from the spindle to detached sister centromeres after kinetochore assembly. After their capture by microtubules, Mad1 and Bub1 progressively disappeared from kinetochores. Sister chromatids that arrested with a lateral attachment to one microtubule exhibited half the Mad1 of fully detached sisters. We propose that detached kinetochores compete with alternate binding sites in the nucleus to recruit Mad1 and Bub1 from available pools that are small enough to be fully depleted by just one pair of detached kinetochores and that lateral attachment licenses Mad1 removal from kinetochores after a kinetic delay. The American Society for Cell Biology 2015-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4501360/ /pubmed/26023090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0276 Text en © 2015 Krefman et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Articles
Krefman, Nathaniel I.
Drubin, David G.
Barnes, Georjana
Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment
title Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment
title_full Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment
title_fullStr Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment
title_full_unstemmed Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment
title_short Control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited Mad1 recruitment
title_sort control of the spindle checkpoint by lateral kinetochore attachment and limited mad1 recruitment
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0276
work_keys_str_mv AT krefmannathanieli controlofthespindlecheckpointbylateralkinetochoreattachmentandlimitedmad1recruitment
AT drubindavidg controlofthespindlecheckpointbylateralkinetochoreattachmentandlimitedmad1recruitment
AT barnesgeorjana controlofthespindlecheckpointbylateralkinetochoreattachmentandlimitedmad1recruitment