Cargando…

Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) are frequently included in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both drugs are detoxified by glutathione transferases (GST), and GST gene variants may explain some of the interindividual variability in pharma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bremer, Sara, Fløisand, Yngvar, Brinch, Lorentz, Gedde-Dahl, Tobias, Bergan, Stein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4505914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000180
_version_ 1782381608931688448
author Bremer, Sara
Fløisand, Yngvar
Brinch, Lorentz
Gedde-Dahl, Tobias
Bergan, Stein
author_facet Bremer, Sara
Fløisand, Yngvar
Brinch, Lorentz
Gedde-Dahl, Tobias
Bergan, Stein
author_sort Bremer, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) are frequently included in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both drugs are detoxified by glutathione transferases (GST), and GST gene variants may explain some of the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity. METHODS: The study investigated adult patients (n = 114) receiving oral Bu pre-HSCT. Bu doses were adjusted to obtain an average steady-state concentration (C(ss)) of 900 mcg/L. RESULTS: Median first dose Bu C(ss) was 1000 mcg/L (600–1780 mcg/L). Patients carrying 1 and 2 GSTA1*B (rs3957357) alleles demonstrated median 12% and 16% higher Bu C(ss) (P ≤ 0.05). Bu exposure (average C(ss); odds ratio = 1.009, 95% confidence interval = 1.002–1.017, P = 0.013) and GSTM1 gene copy number (odds ratio = 17.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.46–201, P = 0.024) were significant predictors of mortality ≤30 days. The mortality was 25% versus 2% among carriers of 2 versus no GSTM1 copies (P = 0.021). Mortality ≤3 months was associated with higher first dose Bu exposure (1090 versus 980 mcg/L, P = 0.021). GSTM1 expression and high Bu exposure may increase Cy toxicity by reducing intracellular glutathione. CONCLUSIONS: GST genotyping before HSCT may allow better prediction of Bu pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity, and thereby improve outcome after BuCy conditioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4505914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45059142015-08-05 Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning Bremer, Sara Fløisand, Yngvar Brinch, Lorentz Gedde-Dahl, Tobias Bergan, Stein Ther Drug Monit Original Article BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) are frequently included in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both drugs are detoxified by glutathione transferases (GST), and GST gene variants may explain some of the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity. METHODS: The study investigated adult patients (n = 114) receiving oral Bu pre-HSCT. Bu doses were adjusted to obtain an average steady-state concentration (C(ss)) of 900 mcg/L. RESULTS: Median first dose Bu C(ss) was 1000 mcg/L (600–1780 mcg/L). Patients carrying 1 and 2 GSTA1*B (rs3957357) alleles demonstrated median 12% and 16% higher Bu C(ss) (P ≤ 0.05). Bu exposure (average C(ss); odds ratio = 1.009, 95% confidence interval = 1.002–1.017, P = 0.013) and GSTM1 gene copy number (odds ratio = 17.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.46–201, P = 0.024) were significant predictors of mortality ≤30 days. The mortality was 25% versus 2% among carriers of 2 versus no GSTM1 copies (P = 0.021). Mortality ≤3 months was associated with higher first dose Bu exposure (1090 versus 980 mcg/L, P = 0.021). GSTM1 expression and high Bu exposure may increase Cy toxicity by reducing intracellular glutathione. CONCLUSIONS: GST genotyping before HSCT may allow better prediction of Bu pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity, and thereby improve outcome after BuCy conditioning. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2015-08 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4505914/ /pubmed/25565670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000180 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bremer, Sara
Fløisand, Yngvar
Brinch, Lorentz
Gedde-Dahl, Tobias
Bergan, Stein
Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning
title Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning
title_full Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning
title_fullStr Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning
title_full_unstemmed Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning
title_short Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning
title_sort glutathione transferase gene variants influence busulfan pharmacokinetics and outcome after myeloablative conditioning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4505914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000180
work_keys_str_mv AT bremersara glutathionetransferasegenevariantsinfluencebusulfanpharmacokineticsandoutcomeaftermyeloablativeconditioning
AT fløisandyngvar glutathionetransferasegenevariantsinfluencebusulfanpharmacokineticsandoutcomeaftermyeloablativeconditioning
AT brinchlorentz glutathionetransferasegenevariantsinfluencebusulfanpharmacokineticsandoutcomeaftermyeloablativeconditioning
AT geddedahltobias glutathionetransferasegenevariantsinfluencebusulfanpharmacokineticsandoutcomeaftermyeloablativeconditioning
AT berganstein glutathionetransferasegenevariantsinfluencebusulfanpharmacokineticsandoutcomeaftermyeloablativeconditioning